Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJuly 9OSC Final_Minutes15-0709.docx 1 Los Altos Hills Open Space Committee Los Altos Hills Parks and Recreation Building FINAL Minutes of Regular Meeting July 09, 2015 Members Present: George Clifford, Nancy Couperus, Alice Sakamoto, Sharen Schoendorf, Roger Spreen, Jean Struthers, Sue Welch Members Absent: Karen Lemes, Wendie Ward, Kit Gordon (Associate Member), City Council Liaison Absent: Gary Waldeck Member of Public Present: Kjell Karlsson (10:10 am; Traffic Safety Committee) 1. Call to Order and Approval of Minutes A. Roll Call. RS called meeting to order at 9:08 am. B. Acceptance of Meeting Minutes. Minutes of the June 11, 2014 Regular Meeting were approved with minor amendments. (NC moved; AS seconded; GC, NC, AS, SS, RS, JS voted in favor; SW abstained.) 2. Continuing Business A. Byrne Preserve i) Open Space Stewardship Goals for 2015-16. Several invasive weed removal workdays have been held. As of June 22, 2015, Byrne Brigade workdays have been moved to Mondays (9:30 am to noon). OSC will request Acterra provide their records and photos from last year so they can be consolidated into a form for reporting progress to Council and staff. ii) Conservation Grazing Management. Sheila Barry, UC Cooperative Extension Bay Area Natural Resources/Livestock Manager will visit Byrne grassland on July 14, 2015 (start at 9:00 at WWB) and advise on conservation grazing. Ms. Barry can provide expert advice about the status of the grassland and ideas about how the site can be improved for both horses and natural resources. Invitees include Acterra staff, Torie Dye and Deborah McCarley from WWB, Sarah Gaultieri from Parks and Rec, Public Works staff, and OSC members. Cost will be Ms. Barry’s transportation (driving from San Jose). Public Works Director, Richard Chiu, met with three OSC members on July 1 and requested they continue to pursue identifying a profession firm that will assess the site and prepare a formal report for the Town. iii) Creek Erosion: SCVWD Grant. Acterra is preparing a grant application with the Town to submit to SCVWD for bank stabilization and revegetation of the eroding tributary of Moody Creek that runs through the grassland in Byrne Preserve. Grant applications are due August 10, 2015. OSC has asked to review the grant application and will prepare a letter of support. iv) Off-Leash Dogs in Byrne. No recent observations by OSC members. Sheriff’s Deputy continues patrols and an LATC article reported 3-4 citations/warnings have been issued. v) SOD Prevention and Bay Removal. Nothing to report. vi) Limiting Biking in Byrne Preserve. OSC reviewed the revised (one page) version of the proposal presented at the June meeting about limiting mountain bikes on trails within Byrne Open Space Preserve, except on the fire road connecting Central Drive to Moody Court (Attachment A). The primary rationale is safety for horses and pedestrians. Additional minor edits were made. The final proposal will be sent to Gary Waldeck and Richard Chiu for advice on submitting it to Council. Packet will include supporting materials (i.e., excerpt from the Bicycle Transportation Design section of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual, which advises against allowing bikes and horses to share multi-use trails, and a list of regulations limiting bicycling in local open space areas and state and county parks). vii) Coyote Activity. No recent complaints to the Town. The LATC published an excellent informational article about coyotes on July 1 (Attachment B). D. Creek Signage. Deferred. OSC Final_Minutes15-0709.docx 2 E. Our Town articles. OSC discussed submitting an informational article about local snakes (to be authored by Tay Vanderlip) for next spring’s issue. 4. New Topics A. Trail Camera Project. Nothing to report. B. Creek Setback Staking. A suggestion was made at the May OSC meeting that the Planning Department require developers to mark creek setbacks with story poles or wildlife-permeable fencing at the time story poles are erected for a proposed house and/or during construction (as is done to protect heritage oaks). SS and SW, who last month volunteered to research policies in LAH and other local jurisdictions, requested additional time to find relevant information. OSC discussed specific ordinances, whether fencing should be required, and if so, what type.. C. Wildlife Seminar on Snakes. Deferred until next spring. 3. Planning A. Fence Permits. None reported B. Site Plan Reviews. OSC reviewed the following plans. It has come to the attention of the OSC that Planning Department has not been forwarding for OSC review development plans for parcels that have an existing conservation or open space easement. OSC will request to receive these plans for review. i) 26727 Taaffe Road. Development plans and surveyors’ maps from the Santa Clara County Assessors Office the show a conservation easement over the steep slope over the back of the parcel (Attachment C). Chair RS will convey to the Planning Department the OSC recommendation that this easement be retained. ii) 26991 Taaffe Road. Surveyors’ maps from the Santa Clara County Assessors Office show that this parcel also has a large open space easement along the steep back slope. (Attachment D). 5. Communications from the Floor. None. 6. Open Discussion. A. Conservation Easements and Open Space Easement. OSC discussed a proposal to modify the term used for existing “conservation easements (CEs)” to “open space easements” for consistency and as parcels with existing CEs come up for development. The term the Town uses for these easements that are required during development (but not necessarily the required conditions) changed in 2003. The term “conservation easement” is now applied only to voluntary agreements between a landowner and a qualified organization or jurisdiction that protect land in its natural, scenic, historic, agricultural, forested, or open space condition in perpetuity. Using a single consistent term will help avoid confusion in the future. B. 23400 Ravensbury. OSC discussed the status of the waterway that runs through 23400 Ravensbury, a parcel now undergoing development. Although this waterway is an upper tributary of Loyola Creek, it does not appear to be designated as a creek on USGS or SCVWD maps. OSC may visit the site. 7. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 10:40 am. Next Regular Meeting: Thursday, August 13, 2015 9:00 AM at LAH Parks and Recreation Building Attachment A: OSC letter to Requesting Limited Bike Use in Byrne Preserve Attachment B: LATC article on Coyotes Attachment C: Santa Clara County Assessors’ Map showing CE on 26727 Taaffe Road Attachment D: Santa Clara County Assessors’ Map showing OSE on 26991 Taaffe Road Approved without amendments at the regular meeting of the Open Space Committee on Oct 8, 2015 To:  Richard  Chiu   From:    Los  Altos  Hills  Open  Space  Committee   Date:  July  9,  2015   Subject:  Limiting  bike  usage  in  Byrne  Preserve   RECOMMENDED  ACTION   On  June  11,  2015,  the  Open  Space  Committee  voted  unanimously  to  recommend  that  the  Town   of  Los  Altos  Hills  limit  the  use  of  bicycles  within  Byrne  Open  Space  Preserve,  prohibiting  them   from  all  areas  except  the  fire  road  connecting  Central  Drive  to  Moody  Court.   BACKGROUND   After  receiving  complaints  in  April  2014  about  cyclists  in  Byrne  Preserve  spooking  horses,  the   City  Council  voted  to  install  signage  in  four  different  locations  within  Byrne  Preserve  notifying   cyclists  that  they  need  to  yield  to  pedestrians  and  equestrians.    Unfortunately,  the  signage  has   not  prevented  bikers  from  careening  down  steep  and  windy  slopes  at  breakneck  speed,   imperiling  hikers,  walkers,  and  equestrians.  These  continued  incidents  lead  us  to  conclude  that   bicycle  use  is  incompatible  with  safe  management  of  the  Preserve.   RATIONALE   Safety  is  the  primary  rationale.    The  Caltrans  Highway  Design  Manual  regarding  design  for   mixed-­‐use  trails  (Chapter  1000  -­‐  Bicycle  Transportation  Design)  states  that  trails  not  meeting   Class  1  standards  should  not  be  signed  as  bicycle  trails  and  warns  –  for  safety  reasons  –  against   allowing  bicycles  and  horses  to  share  the  same  pathway.   The  Caltrans  Design  Manual  also  explains  horse  behavior  on  trails  (1003.4  –  Trails,  see   attached),  underscoring  that  horses  have  a  flight  response  that  can  lead  to  serious  injury  to   both  horse  and  rider.    While  you  can  get  a  horse  “trail  ready,”  you  can  never  train  the  flight   response  out  of  a  horse.   Secondly,  bikes  on  narrow,  winding  trails  or  on  any  steep  terrain  cause  significant   environmental  damage.    Unlike  walkers  or  equestrians,  bicycles  accelerate  erosion  by  creating  a   continuous  tire  track,  creating  a  rill  into  which  water  flows.    Bicycle  tires  rip  the  soil  when   cyclists  speed  downhill,  lock  brakes  around  sharp  corners,  or  dig  in  for  uphill  traction.     Disturbances  to  both  the  vegetation  in  these  protected  open  spaces  and  also  the  wildlife   seeking  refuge  in  them  are  significant  concerns.     Thirdly,  preserves  are  intended  for  quiet,  low-­‐impact  recreation  where  people  can  enjoy  peace   and  quiet  in  a  natural  setting  without  worrying  that  a  speeding  bike  may  be  around  the  next   corner.    Limiting  bicycle  use  in  Byrne  will  not  significantly  reduce  recreational  opportunities  for   off-­‐road  biking  in  LAH;  the  Town  has  over  90  miles  of  pathways  outside  of  Byrne  that  are   accessible  for  bicycle  use.  Also,  nearby  MROSD  lands  provide  220  miles  of  trails  open  for  biking.   Finally,  prohibiting  cycling  in  Byrne  Preserve  would  bring  us  in  line  with  the  policies  in  state  and   county  parks  and  MROSD.      Most  state  and  county  parks  in  Santa  Clara  and  San  Mateo  County   restrict  bicycles  to  paved  roads  or  fire  roads.    MROSD  specifically  prohibits  cycling  in  all  areas   immediately  adjacent  to  Los  Altos  Hills,  while  in  their  Rancho  San  Antonio  preserves  (which  run   contiguous  to  LAH),  they  only  permit  cycling  east  of  Deer  Hollow  Farm  (in  Cupertino).   AttachmentB- LATC Article on coyotes15-0709 Recent coyote attacks keep residents on edge Published in Los Altos town Crier on Wednesday, 01 July 2015 01:04 Written by Megan V. Winslow - Staff Writer/meganw@latc.com Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on linkedin Share on google_plusone_share Share on email A recent coyote attack in Mountain View that left a neighborhood cat dead has local residents concerned, but animal services officials said pet owners can take simple precautionary measures to avoid such encounters. A cacophony of commotion awoke residents on the 1600 block of Tulane Drive at approximately 1 a.m. June 14. Some witnessed two coyotes overpowering a smaller ani mal, but it wasn’t until daylight that anyone identified Fred, a 15-year-old neighborhood cat, as the victim. His body had been eviscerated – a telltale sign of coyotes. “I saw the cat,” said Anne Ferris, a Tulane Drive resident. “It was so horrible. I can’t tell you.” Fred wasn’t Ferris’ feline, but he once considered her house on Tulane Drive his home. As Fred’s original owners prepared to move to Arizona four years ago, they worried that he might become prey for coyotes and cougars in their new town. So their neighbor, Cindy Jarvis, adopted him. A hefty cat weighing in at 16 pounds, Fred often opted to explore and sleep outside. Jarvis described her pet as a “neighborhood ambassador” everyone loved and greeted. “We’re pretty heartbroken,” she said. Photo by Kira Gunderson/Special to the Town Crier A coyote prowls Rancho San Antonio Preserve earlier this year Highly adaptable predators The Varsity Park neighborhood – just a short walk from the Blossom Valley shopping center and Springer School – might seem like a surprisingly suburban environment for coyotes. But the animals have been known to use creekbeds as highways into the city, and Permanente Creek runs adjacent to Tulane Drive. The persistent drought and dwindling food sources for coyotes can embolden the canines to venture down from the foothills and into residential areas in search of sustenance, said Cody Macartney, lead animal control officer with the Palo Alto Police Department, which provides animal services to Los Altos and Los Altos Hills. Subscribers to Nextdoor.com, an online social network for neighborhoods, reported recent coyote attacks on pets in Los Altos. One involved a black cat whose remains were found near the entrance to Covington School in recent weeks and another in April in which a cat’s body was left in the front yard of a home on South Clark Avenue. The Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office has noted 10 instances of coyote -human interface within the West Valley area since the beginning of the year – two of which took place in the Los Altos-Los Altos Hills area. Most recently, a woman reported seeing a coyote follow her as she walked her dogs June 11 near the intersection of Magdalena Avenue and Hooper Lane in Los Altos Hills. “From what I recall, the coyote was rather bold about it,” Sgt. Jeffrey McCoy wrote in an email to the Town Crier. Female coyotes generally give birth in April and May and soon after train their pups to hunt. And as these new families venture into suburban areas like Los Altos and Mountain View, it would make sense for mother coyotes to teach their pups to prey on easy targets like domestic cats and small dogs, Macartney said. AttachmentB- LATC Article on coyotes15-0709 Coyotes are extremely opportunistic feeders, agreed Dan Soszynski, executive director of the Silicon Valley Animal Control Authority. “They’ve adapted very well and see, unfortunately, people’s pets as dinner,” he said. Soszynski’s go-to anecdote for putting the urban coyote problem in perspective is an incident that occurred in downtown Chicago in November 2012. A pair of wild coyotes took up residence just outside Wrigley Field. “If coyotes can make it there, we shouldn’t be too shocked to see them straying from our open spaces,” he said. Because coyotes are instinctively fearful of humans, attacks on people – even children – are extremely rare, and local officials do not recall such an incident occurring within recent years. The animals can, however, carry rabies, and any direct encounters with pets or humans should be reported. Precautionary measures and common sense While reports of coyotes preying on pets may have increased in the past few years, there doesn’t seem to be a sudden rash justifying panic, according to animal service officials. They said most coyote encounters can be prevented by humans adopting simple precautionary measures and relying on common sense. Byrne Preserve in Los Altos Hills is a popular recreational destination, but coyotes are known to den there and will assert themselves to protect their pups. Trail walkers allowing dogs to wander off -leash or at the end of long, retractable leashes attract coyote attention. The Sheriff’s Office has established a watch detail at the preserve to educate the public and to enforce leash laws. In the past month and a half, deputies have issued three or four citations. The Los Altos Hills Open Space Committee promotes “coyote hazing,” methods for reinforcing coyotes’ natural instincts to avoid humans, and provides Project Coyote brochures with tips for doing so at Byrne Preserve entrances. “Passive” hazing includes removing coyote attractants by keeping cats and small dogs inside at night, ensuring that trash-can lids fasten securely and removing fallen fruit from under trees. “Active” hazing pertains to reacting to the inappropriate presence of a coyote by generating lo ud noise, standing one’s ground and making eye contact with the animal to scare it away. Running away is not recommended, and those walking small dogs should pick up their pets before engaging in active hazing. Despite the panic a coyote encounter could incite, hazing techniques are more effective than euthanizing or relocating a pack, said Nancy Couperus, member of the Los Altos Hills Open Space Committee. “They’re part of the ecosystem, and they’re very important for rodent control,” she said of coyotes. “We want to encourage people to co-exist with them rather than viewing them as vermin and trying to get rid of them.” For more information, visit projectcoyote.org. RESOLUTION 54-13 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR OPEN SPACE EASEMENT Lands Tiop Inc) WHEREAS, Tiop Inc ("Owner") owns the property commonly known as 26991 Taaffe Road Road, Los Altos Hills, California; and WHEREAS, the Town has adopted a General Plan and, pursuant thereto, may accept grants of open space easements on privately owned lands lying within the Town; WHEREAS,the Owner has offered to enter into an agreement for open space easement attached to this Resolution as Attachment A ("Open Space Easement Agreement") to limit the use of a portion of the property in order to reduce potential adverse impacts on such land including grading, vegetation removal, and erosion; WHEREAS, the Town finds the Open Space Easement Agreement to be consistent with the Town's General Plan and in the best interests of the Town; WHEREAS, the Owner and the Town recognize that the land subject to the Open Space Easement Agreement is essentially unimproved and if retained in its natural state has substantial scenic value to the public and that the preservation of such land as open space constitutes an important physical, social, aestheticand economic asset to the Town and the Owner; WHEREAS, the Open Space Easement Agreement contains the appropriate restrictions and covenants to preserve the natural and scenic character of the land; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills does RESOLVE as follows: The Town hereby accepts on behalf of the public, and for the purposes therein described, approves the Open Space Easement Agreement attached to this Resolution as Attachment A; and the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Open Space Easement Agreement. The above and foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of October, 2013 by the following vote: AYES: Waldeck, Corrigan, Harpootlian, Larsen, Radford NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None Resolution 54-13 Page 1 BY: ..' '‘-'-'-'' Gary Waldeck, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah Padovan, City Clerk Resolution 54-13 Page 2 Attachment A This Document Is Recorded For the Benefit of the Town of Los Altos Hills And is Exempt from Fee Per Government Code Sections 6103 and 27383 When Recorded,Mail to: Town of Los Altos Hills 26379 Fremont Road Los Altos Hills,CA 94022 Attention: City Clerk AGREEMENT FOR OPEN SPACE EASEMENT This Agreement for Open.Space Easement ("Agreement") is made and entered into this 17th day of October 2013, by and between Tiop Inc, Owner") and the Town of Los Altos Hills, a municipal corporation, ("Town"). RECITALS A. Owner owns that certain real property in the Town of Los Altos Hills commonly known as 26991 Taaffe Road,Los Altos Hills California. B. Town has adopted a General Plan and, pursuant thereto, may accept grants of open space easements on privately owned lands lying within the Town. C. Town fmds this open space easement to be consistent with the Town's General Plan and in the best interests of the Town. D. Owner and Town desire to limit the use of a portion of the property more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto, by dedication of an open space easement in order to reduce potential adverse impacts on such land including grading, vegetation removal, and erosion, recognizing that such land is essentially unimproved and if retained in its natural state has substantial scenic value to the public and that the preservation of such land as open space constitutes an important physical, social, aesthetic and economic asset to the Town and to Owner. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein and the substantial public benefits to be derived therefrom, do hereby agree as follows: 1. Grant of Open Space Easement. Owner, as grantor, hereby grants an open space easement to the Town of Los Altos Hills, a municipal corporation in the County of Santa Clara, State of California, over the real property described and shown as Exhibit A, Resolution 54-13 Page 3 the "Property"), to have and to hold said open space easement for the term and for the purposes and subject to the conditions, covenants, and exceptions described herein. 2.Statutory Authorization. This Agreement and grant of open space easement are made and entered into pursuant to Chapter 6.6 commencing with Section 51070 of Part 1, Division 1, Title 5 of the Government Code. This Agreement is subject to all of the provisions of said sections and chapters including any amendments thereto which may hereafter be enacted. 3. Restriction on Use of Property. During the term of this Agreement and the open space easement granted herein, the Property shall not be used for any purpose other than an open space easement and those uses related to or compatible therewith. Owner, for the direct benefit of the Property described herein, hereby declares that the Property shall be subject to restrictive covenants running with the land which shall be binding upon all subsequent grantees. Said restrictive covenants shall be: a.against the right of Owner to construct any improvements on or within the Property except for public and private utilities and paths dedicated to the Town or an approved septic system, provided these reserved exceptions shall be consistent with the purposes of maintaining and preserving the natural or scenic character of the land; and b. against the extraction of natural resources or other activities which may destroy the unique physical and scenic characteristics of the land; and c.against the grading of land for reasons other than attendant to permitted uses including but not limited to drainage improvements and underground utilities; and d. against the cutting of vegetation, except as may be required for fire prevention, thinning, elimination of diseased growth, removal of invasive or non-native species and similar measures; and e.against any plantings other than native vegetation; and f.against the erection of structures other than lawful fences or any improvements authorized by Paragraph 3(a)herein. 4. Exceptions. The City Council of the Town may authorize exceptions to the foregoing restrictive covenants, provided such exceptions are consistent with the purposes of law and not incompatible with maintaining and preserving the natural character of the land. 5. Restrictions on Public Use. The public shall not have a right of entry upon the Property. The right of entry and surface use is limited solely to the Town, but only for the purpose of inspection of condition of the Property. Resolution 54-13 Page 4 6. Term of Agreement. This open space easement and Agreement shall be effective on the date of recordation of this Agreement and shall remain in effect in perpetuity,unless abandoned pursuant to Government Code Sections 51093 and 51094 or any successor legislation. 7.Successors in Interest. This Agreement and the open space easement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto do hereby execute this agreement. OWNER: Date: J w+- 2013 Tiop Inc KEY 7,-/' Y` TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS: Date: October 21 ,2013 Mayor ity Clerk Resolution 54-13 Page 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA x On 4. tv_ , 2013,before me, ..900 ' S le( d Notary Public,personally appeared U who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons)whose namesA is/aye subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/SIte4hey executed the same in his/herltleir authorized capacity(i9s), and that by his/her/their signature(s) n the instrument the person, or the entity fipon behalf of which the personas.) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. uuxuuunniwuumiumnnuwDiOiU iGn SiHOmuuunuo l • COMM.#1893351 r .•- NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA F. Signature: See) MY SANTA COmm.ExCLARAp.Jun: COUN20TY, 2o1a 114111F IIMINI uuxumMnnwimmnmumnxuunuuuun11111 ui Resolution 54-13 Page 6 ki' STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA On October 21,2013, before me, Deborah L. Padovan,Notary Public,personally appeared Gary Waldeck,who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. DEBORAH L.PADOVAN Signature: Seal) Commission x'1929787 . I 9 Notaryr Public-California K-ri/ Sbnoma County. 3 MxComm.Exeina At 19,20151 Resolution 54-13 Page 7 RESOLUTION 54-13 y City Clerk of the Tovrn of Los Altos fulls RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR OPEN SPACE EASEMENT Lands Tiop Inc) WHEREAS,Tiop Inc ("Owner")owns the property commonly known as 26991 Taaffe Road Road, Los Altos Hills, California; and WHEREAS, the Town has adopted a General Planand, pursuant thereto, may accept grants of open space easements on privately owned lands lying within the Town; WHEREAS,the Owner has offered to enter into an agreement for open space easement attached to this Resolution as Attachment A("Open Space Easement Agreement") to limit the use of a portion of the property in order to reduce potential adverse impacts on such land including grading, vegetation removal, and erosion; WHEREAS, the Town finds the Open Space Easement Agreement to be consistent with the Town's General Plan and in the best interests of the Town; WHEREAS,the Owner and the Town recognize that the land subject to the Open Space Easement Agreement is essentially unimproved and if retained in its natural state has substantial scenic value to the public and that the preservation of such land as open space constitutes an important physical, social,aesthetic and economic asset to the Town and the Owner; WHEREAS, the Open Space Easement Agreement contains the appropriate restrictions and covenants to preserve the natural and scenic character of the land; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the Town of Los Altos.Hills does RESOLVE as follows: The Town hereby accepts on behalf of the public, and for the purposes therein described, approves the Open Space Easement Agreement attached to this Resolution as Attachment A; and the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Open Space Easement Agreement. The above and foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of October,2013 by the following vote: AYES: Waldeck, Corrigan, Harpootlian, Larsen,Radford NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None Resolution 54-13 Page 8 Resolution 5413 Page 1 BY: Gary Waldeck,Mayor A[TEST: Deborah Padovan, City Clerk Resolution 54-13 Page 9 Resolution 54-13 Page 2 Exhibit A Legal Description of Open Space Easement Property and Plat Accompanying Description Resolution 54-13 Page 10 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OPEN SPACE EASEMENT 26991 TAAFFE ROAD LOS ALTOS HILLS, CALIFORNIA All that certain real property in the Town of Los Altos Hills, County of Santa Clara, State of California, described as follows: Being a portion of Lot 4, as shown on that certain Tract Map No. 4444, which is filed for record on January 24, 1969,in Book 248 of Maps, at Page 6, in Santa Clara County records, and being more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at the most northwesterly corner of said Lot 4; Thence, along the northerly line of said Lot 4, North 62° 51' 44"East, 276.33 feet; Thence, continuing along the northerly line of said Lot 4, North 58° 07' 11" East, 44.68 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Lot 4; Thence, leaving the northerly line of said Lot 4 and along the easterly line of said Lot 4, South 26° 21' 55"East, 79.63 feet; Thence, leaving the said easterly line of Lot 4, North 80° 41' 00"West, 19.87 feet; Thence, South 79° 57' 00"West, 15.50 feet; Thence, South 71° 10' 00"West, 42.50 feet; Thence, South 59° 19' 30"West,42.00 feet; Thence, South 40° 45' 30"West, 55.50 feet; Thence, South 58° 30' 00"West, 37.80 feet; Thence, North 64° 01' 30"West, 32.70 feet; Thence,North 86° 18' 30"West, 19.70 feet; Thence, South 77° 33' 00"West, 29.80 feet; Page 1 of 3 Resolution 54-13 Page 11 1110 Thence, South 68° 28' 30"West, 50.00 feet, to a point lying on the westerly line of said Lot 4; Thence, along the westerly line of said Lot 4,North 28° 33' 03"West, 31.10 feet,to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing an area of approximately 18,154 square feet,more or less.. END OF DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT"A"is the plat to accompany this legal description, and which is made a part hereto. Prepared by or under the direct supervision of: t 7078 11, Mark A. Helton _ ERR, /i• S41i OF CAO` l Page2of 3 Resolution 54-13 Page 12 0 BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BEARING OF N 6251'44" E BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 4, AS SHOWN OF THE CERTAIN TRACT MAP NO. 4444, WHICH WAS 11"t. FILED FOR 1969 IN BOOKCORD ON 248 OF MAPS,AT RY 24, 30J2 y$ kR 6$ 3 PAGE 6, IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY 0\RECORDS. NO• 51) 1,1 4) L w0 , r/ ii1P\O 28 067 4"S /17777s5. /ie ® 0, 3 05 1 o N8336'SO4W CP P PpE15 I' S63g9 y 5 5 116 91 09: 6‘ ,11F5 $ 0 Pp1ttai PSP P cin"e OPO is05 W A BEG t 5rrS63 3 c, w o_ O O O1 Ik lk co. co ro ti vo^ 61 A I LLND co RPO 20 0OG. o ! 4 / 4i45,. oe OF 1 / k 1 OO o° KT.Niz7 7814 0OS 208 N i. I oOG h Q / OF ALtl° 4 h 14p. p / UNE DATA 1i ek h NO. DIRECTION LENGTHI 60. n,0te 0 S68 28'30"W 50.00' kph i S7733'00"W 29.80' SCALE: 1"=60' 71 0), g 0) N861 8'30"W 19.70' 0 N64'01'30"W 32.70' 4,. O S58'30'00"W 37.80' 0 S40'45'30"W 55.50' LEGEND O 55919'30"W 42.00' DISTINCTIVE PROPERTY LINE 0 S7170'00"W 42.50' PROPERTY LINE 0 S79 57'00"W 15.50' CENTERLINE Q N8041'00"W 19.87' EASEMENT LINE n SCALE: 1"=60' PLAT TO ACCOMPANY 4, Giuliani & Kull,Inc. DATE: 6/4/13 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Engineers • Planners • Surveyors DRAWN: E.T. OPEN SPACE EASEMENT 4880 Stevens Creek Blvd. Suite 205 San Jose, CA. 95129 CHECKED: M.H. 26991 TAAFFE ROAD 408) 615-4000 Fax (408) 615-4004 JOB NO.: 12117 Auburn • San Jose • Oakdalopcni, naET : 3 OF 3 LOS ALTOS HILLS, CALIFORNIA FI\2012\12117\dwg\12117PLAT.dwg 6/4/2013 1'58105 PM PDT