HomeMy WebLinkAboutMarch 4
Los Altos Hills Open Space Committee
Regular Meeting Minutes
9:00 AM, March 4, 2020
Los Altos Hills Town Hall, Heritage House
Committee Members and Associates Present: Richard Contreras (Chair), Nancy Couperus
(Founder), Jean Struthers, Wendie Ward, Kit Gordon, Karen Lemes (Associate), Sharen
Schoendorf (Associate)
Committee Members Absent: Alice Sakamoto (Associate), George Clifford (Vice Chair), Sue
Welch, Peter Brown, Kjell Karlsson (Associate)
Council Liaison Present: George Tyson
Members of the public: Kristen Williams (Grassroots Ecology) Valerie Lee (Grassroots
Ecology), Birgitta Indaco (Planning Commissioner)
1. Call to Order and Acceptance of Minutes
a. Roll Call. RC called the meeting to order at 9:05 am
b. Acceptance of Meeting Minutes. KG moved to accept the minutes from February 12.
RC seconded and the vote was unanimously in favor of approval (RC, WW, KG,
JS).
c. Announcements.
i. March 12 Complete Streets Green Streets Symposium in Mountain View
ii. Charlie Knowles, local wildlife expert, was featured in local magazine.
2. Planning
a. 13254 East Sunset Drive (KG, RC). The developer applied for a permit for a new
multistory residence with pool. KG moved and RC seconded the acceptance of the
report and these Open Space Committee recommendations. The vote was
unanimously in favor (RC, WW, KG, JS).
i. The OSC request the developer dedicate an open space easement at
approximately the 302-elevation line as per Town policies. See diagram. Trails
are allowed in open space easements.
ii. A riparian setback 25 feet from top of bank is requested as per Town ordinance.
iii. Remove old barbed wire from top of bank and at south border near the creek.
iv. Require a Condition of Approval (COA) to remove stinkwort by September 15
every year during construction.
b. 27575 Black Mountain Road (KG, RC). The developer applied for a permit for a new
multistory residence with pool and a log cabin. RC moved and WW seconded the
acceptance of the report and these Open Space Committee recommendations. The
vote was unanimously in favor (RC, WW, KG, JS).
i. Require a Condition of Approval (COA) to remove stinkwort by September 15
every year during construction.
c. 24180 Dawnridge Drive (KG, WW). The developer has requested abandonment of a
Light and Air Easement deeded at time of subdivision in 1954. KG moved and RC
seconded the acceptance of the report and these Open Space Committee
recommendations. The vote was unanimously in favor (RC, WW, KG, JS).
i. The Open Space Committee does not feel it has the authority to vacate a deeded
easement.
ii. The Open Space Committee does not recommend modifying the existing deeded
easement.
iii. The Open Space Committee recommends that conditions of subdivisions be kept
in perpetuity as they were intended.
iv. The Open Space Committee is concerned about setting a precedent that could
undermine planning instruments such as easements and setbacks that are
established at time of subdivision or development.
d. 12663 Corte Madera Lane (RC, WW). The developer applied for a permit to replace
existing house. KG moved and WW seconded the acceptance of the report and these
Open Space Committee recommendations. The vote was unanimously in favor (RC,
WW, KG, JS).
i. The OSC request the developer dedicate an open space easement 25 feet from top
of bank (as per engineers drawing plans) as required by Town ordinance. The
existing house can remain within the easement but future development within the
easement is not allowed.
ii. A riparian setback 25 feet from top of bank is requested as per Town ordinance.
iii. Show the top of creek bank correctly in all plans. The engineers plan is correct,
the contracting set is incorrect
iv. Remove palm tree from creek bed.
v. Require a Condition of Approval (COA) to remove stinkwort by September 15
every year during construction.
e. Fence Permit Reviews: RC is working with Town staff to allow permit notices for our
committee.
3. New & Continuing Business
a. Grassroots Ecology Update: Valerie Lee and Kristen Williams provided an update of
our Open Space Preserves. They have engaged over 3500 community members, mostly
youth, at more than 250 events since 2014. The preserves now have greater plant species
diversity which allows greater biodiversity for all fauna. The amount of invasive pest
plants has reduced substantially. Grassroots Ecology coordinates closely with Town staff
for strategic mowing of yellow star thistle, Italian thistle and mustard. The horses reduce
thatch, allowing more native plants to emerge. In areas that had yellow star thistle, native
yampah, purple needle grass, poppy, lupines, buttercup and soap plants have emerged.
Oxalis is a growing concern
b. ADU Update: As of January 1, 2020 communities are required to provide a specific
number of affordable housing units. The state law allows for 5-foot setback from side or
rear of property compared to our Town policy of 30-foot setback. Town planning staff is
working to craft an ADU ordinance that will be allowable by the state and defensible
from lawsuits. The Town Council will review the ordinance proposal March 19. (Why
wasn’t the ordinance in place by Jan 1?)
c. Fence Ordinance. No update
d. Tree Ordinance. No Update.
e. Presentation on Native Plants. JS has located two speakers, Paul Heiple and Stephanie
Morris. Date to be determined.
f. Feedback from Planning on OSC Reviews. To be discussed at later date.
g. Native Plants for Landscapes. KG presented a draft proposal to create a native plant
policy.
4. Open Discussion
a. The developer of 24752 Olive Tree Lane requested a modification of the proposed open
space easement. The Committee will review this property at the April meeting.
Meeting adjourned at 11:01 am
Attachment A OSC Review 13254 East Sunset Drive
Attachment B OSC Review 27575 Black Mountain Road
Attachment C OSC Review 24180 Dawnridge Drive
Attachment D OSC Review 12663 Corte Madera Lane
Attachment E Status of Open Space Preserves from Grassroots Ecology
Attachment F Draft Policy to Require Native Plants in Landscapes
Minutes submitted by Kit Gordon
To: Los Altos Hills Planning Department
From: Open Space Committee
Date: March 4, 2020
Property address: 24180 Dawnridge Drive
Date of Site Visit: Feb 27, 2020
Lands of Lowchareonkul APN 336-18-011
Town
Planner
Jeremy Loh Project
Number
MA20-0001
Lot Size Slope LUF DA (sqft) FA (sqft) Earthworks (CY)
1.18
Reason for review: Light and Air Easement Abandonment
PROPERTY SUMMARY
The developer has requested abandonment of a 100-foot front yard Light and Air Easement,
deeded at the time of subdivision. An accessory dwelling unit is possible in the existing Light and
Air Easement. The land in the Light and Air easement is sloped approximately 20%, dotted with
mostly dying pine trees and some small oak trees. It appears several small oaks will be removed
for the ADU. A new garage and secondary dwelling unit is proposed.
In 1954, the developer that subdivided Dawnridge Drive into 9 parcels made and signed the
following statement:
“We also hereby dedicate for public use all easements for Light and Air under and/or over
those certain strips of land lying between the front and/or side lines of lots and the lines
designated as “Building Set Back Line” (B.S.B.L) as shown on said subdivision, such strips of
land to be kept open and free from buildings and structures of any kind excepting irrigation
and sprinkling systems and appurtenances thereto.”
OSC DRAFT RECOMMENDATION
1. The Open Space Committee does not feel it has the authority to vacate a deeded easement.
2. The Open Space Committee does not recommend modifying the existing deeded
easement.
3. The Open Space Committee recommends that conditions of subdivisions be kept in
perpetuity as they were intended.
4. The Open Space Committee is concerned about setting a precedent that could undermine
planning instruments such as easements and setbacks that are established at time of
subdivision or development.
Date of OSC review: March 04, 2020
Voting of review:
Light and Air Easement.
To: Los Altos Hills Planning Department
From: Open Space Committee
Date: March 4, 2020
Property address: 27575 Black Mountain Road
Date of Site Visit: Feb 28, 2020
Lands of Gourji APN 182-11-082
Town
Planner
Jeremy Loh Project
Number
SD20-0009
Lot Size Slope LUF DA (sqft) FA (sqft) Earthworks (CY)
1 acre Slight 15000 5769
Reason for review: New Residents with detached Pool House
PROPERTY SUMMARY
An existing house on this slightly sloped, wedge-shaped lot will be replaced with a new two-story
resident with basement, a log cabin and a pool. There are many mature oaks on the land. The
plans indicate at least three oak trees will be removed including a large multitrunked oak tree
near the front of the property. A majority of the oaks will be saved. Fences are on neighboring
property lines, possibly owned by neighbors. No animal trails were noted.
OSC FINAL RECOMMENDATION
1. Require a Condition of Approval (COA) to remove stinkwort by September 15 every year
during construction.
Date of OSC review: March 04, 2020
Voting of review: unanimously in favor (RC, KG, WW, JS)
Municipal Code 10-2.702 Siting.
(f) Tree Preservation. Every feasible attempt should be made to preserve existing trees
except those trees identified in the Los Altos Hills Landscape Guidelines invasive plant
Conservation Policy 2.2: Minimize disturbance of the natural terrain and vegetation.
Preserve and protect native and naturalized plants, with special attention to preservation
of unique, rare or endangered species and plant communities such as oak woodlands.
Conservation Policy 2.3: Preserve and protect Heritage Trees, including native oaks and
other significant trees, on public and private property.
Conservation Policy 11.5: Ensure that development projects are designed to conserve
the natural slope, preserve existing native vegetation, limit invasive species, and
conserve natural drainage channels and swales.
Land Use Program 2.3 Encourage the preservation of existing trees, rock outcroppings,
ridgelines and other significant natural features
Multi-trunked oak tree planned for removal.
Several small oaks, most planned to be saved.
Old olive tree planned for removal.
To: Los Altos Hills Planning Department
From: Open Space Committee
Date: March 4, 2020
Property address: 13254 East Sunset Drive
Date of Site Visit: Feb 27, 2020
Lands of Suchter APN 175-27-033
Town
Planner
Krista Yost Project
Number
SD20-0008
Lot Size Slope LUF DA (sqft) FA (sqft) Earthworks (CY)
1 acre ~40% <1 8208 3985
Reason for review: New Residents with basement and pool
PROPERTY SUMMARY
An existing house on this steeply sloped lot will be replaced with a new two-story resident with
basement and a pool. The current development is non-conforming but will become conforming
although the LUF is less than 1. Much of the land is sloped equal to or greater than 30% slope. A
tributary of Adobe Creek flows near the lowest elevation border. The property borders Jesuit
Retreat El Retiro to the east and south. Animal trails were abundant at the lower elevations.
OSC FINAL RECOMMENDATION
1. The OSC request the developer dedicate an open space easement at approximately the
302-elevation line as per Town policies. See diagram. Trails are allowed in open space
easements.
2. A riparian setback 25 feet from top of bank is requested as per Town ordinance.
3. Remove old barbed wire from top of bank and at south border near the creek.
4. Require a Condition of Approval to remove stinkwort every year by September 15 during
construction.
Date of OSC review: March 04, 2020
Voting of review: unanimously in favor (RC, KG, WW, JS)
Recommended Open Space Easement shown in green.
Existing house sited near top elevation of property
Terraced retaining walls
Barbed wire near creek
Several animal trails near creek, in area recommended for open space easement.
Municipal Code 10-2.702 Siting.
(e) Creek Protection. Structures shall be set back a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet
from the top of bank of all creeks. Greater setbacks may be required along major creeks in
the Town; however, lesser setbacks may be allowed where approved by the Planning
Commission. Improvements required to all creeks shall be accomplished to appear natural
and to maintain the natural meandering course of the existing creek. Creeks and banks
shall be protected so as to remain in their natural state as much as possible. They should
not be disturbed by the building or grading process. No grading shall be allowed in creeks
or within the required setbacks from top of bank. Siting of structures shall be done with
safety as a primary concern. Safety concerns and preservation of riparian habitat are
required to be simultaneously addressed when designing development and required
improvements to creeks. (§ 15, Ord. 299, eff. December 11, 1985; §§ 6, 7, Ord. 370, eff. May
20, 1994; § 1, Ord. 504, eff. October 28, 2006)
Policies:
Safety Policy 1.1 Open space easements, zoning and other land use regulations shall be
used to limit and, in some cases, prohibit development in areas of unstable terrain, active
fault traces, water channels, flood plains, excessively steep slopes and other areas
determined to be hazardous to public welfare and safety.
Land Use Policy 2.5 Steep slopes, canyons and ravines generally in excess of 30% slope,
as well as natural swales and drainage channels, and geologic hazard areas within areas
designated for residential development shall be left undisturbed and preserved in their
natural condition to the maximum extent feasible.
Conservation Program 1.2: Continue to require Open Space Easements in along creeks
and riparian corridors to ensure that these areas remain in their natural condition.
Conservation Policy 1.3: Preserve the integrity of riparian corridors as unique and
environmentally sensitive resources.
Conservation Policy 3.1: Maintain and protect creeks and riparian corridors for
wildlife that use this resource for food, shelter, migration and breeding.
Conservation Policy 11.5: Ensure that development projects are designed to conserve
the natural slope, preserve existing native vegetation, limit invasive species, and conserve
natural drainage channels and swales.
Conservation Policy 2.2: Minimize disturbance of the natural terrain and vegetation.
Preserve and protect native and naturalized plants, with special attention to preservation
of unique, rare or endangered species and plant communities such as oak woodlands.
Conservation Policy 2.3: Preserve and protect Heritage Trees, including native oaks and
other significant trees, on public and private property.
Conservation Policy 11.5: Ensure that development projects are designed to conserve
the natural slope, preserve existing native vegetation, limit invasive species, and
conserve natural drainage channels and swales.
Land Use Program 2.3 Encourage the preservation of existing trees, rock outcroppings,
ridgelines and other significant natural features
Conservation Policy 2.7: Avoid the development of environmentally sensitive areas that
are rich in wildlife or of a fragile ecological nature, such as areas of rare or endangered
species of plants, or riparian areas.
Conservation Goal 3: Maintain and enhance the integrity of wildlife habitat.
Conservation Program 3.3: Assess the potential for development patterns to fragment
and isolate significant wildlife habitats.
Conservation Section 315: Planning for natural movement of wildlife can help avoid,
minimize and compensate for serious negative impacts on wildlife and humans. Areas
that link wildlife habitat have become vital because native animals such as deer, fox,
bobcat, and coyote are prevented by roads, fences, homes and other development from
moving freely as they once did.
Conservation Section 316: Wildlife move through the planning area along natural
passageways, particularly along creeks and riparian areas that provide sources of food,
water and shelter. Many of these are already Open Space Conservation Areas that protect
wildlife and ecologically significant habitat.
Municipal Code 10-1.507 (d) Prohibited Fences, Walls, Gates, and Column Types. The
following fences are prohibited:
(1) Chain-link or cyclone fences, including any fence with bare lengths of wire stretched
between metal poles, with the exception of dark green, black, or brown vinyl-coated chain-
linked fences with matching vinyl-coated cross bars and caps.
(2) Barbed or razor wire fences, including any fence with attached barbs, sharp points,
or razors. Electric fences, including any fence designed to produce an electric shock,
except where necessary for animal husbandry operations.
(3) Any fence, wall, and/or gate that may cause harm to people, pets, and/or wildlife due
to points, spikes, or sharpened edges on the top or bottom part of the fence, wall structure
and/or gate.
(9) Open Space/Conservation Easement Perimeter Fences.
(i) Maximum height of open space/conservation easement perimeter fences: six (6) ft.
(ii) Minimum distance of lowest fence strand or rail from ground: twelve (12) inches
above grade.
(iii) Open space/conservation easement perimeter fences shall provide openings
sufficient to accommodate the free passage of wildlife through the easement. A split-rail
wood fence (see exhibit) or equivalent design shall be required. Where a pathway is
located within an open space/conservation easement, the perimeter fence shall be
required to have at least two (2) openings at least as wide as the width of the pathway
easement.
(10) Any fence crossing or intersecting an officially designated wildlife corridor shall
conform to the requirements specified above for an open space/conservation easement
perimeter fence.
Open Space Policy 1.1 Provide, during the development process, for the maximum
feasible preservation of open space in and adjoining the Town, with spaces ranging in size
from regional scale to small-scale open space on individual lots.
Open Space Policy 1.4: Preserve the natural beauty and minimize disturbance of the
natural terrain and vegetation.
Open Space Policy 1.7: To the extent possible, link open spaces together visually and
physically to form a system of open spaces.
Open Space Policy 1.8: Ensure that land uses and structures are compatible with the
general open space quality of the planning area.
Open Space Policy 2.6 New residential subdivisions shall provide open space for
recreation in order to meet their appropriate share of local recreation needs.