HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/03/2016
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
Town of Los Altos Hills
PLANNING COMMISSION
Thursday, November 03, 2016, 7:00 PM
Council Chambers, 26379 Fremont Road
______________________________________________________________________________
1. ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Present: Commissioner Couperus, Commissioner Mandle, Commissioner Partridge,
Commissioner Basiji, Chair Tankha
Absent: None
Staff: Planning Director Suzanne Avila, Senior Planner Marni Moseley, Assistant
Planner Genevieve Fernandez, Consultant Planner Steve Padovan,
Administrative Technician Frances Reed
2. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR
There were no presentations from the floor.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Ex parte disclosures: Commissioner Couperus stated that he spoke with Jan Fenwick,
Duffy Price, and met with the Applicant Jed York.
Commissioner Partridge said he met with the Applicant Jed York, his
contractor/representative Dan Corey, the Clearys, and Applicant Sundeep Goyal.
Commissioner Basiji said he spoke with Gary Clear, Applicant Jed York, and had a
site visit with Dan Corey.
Commissioner Mandle said she spoke to Applicant Gautam Agrawal, Nobuko and
Gary Cleary, Dan Corey, Laura Mae, and Danielle York.
Chair Tankha stated that she met with the Applicant Gautam Agrawal, Nobuko and
Gary Cleary, Applicant Jed York, Dan Corey, and spoke with Sundeep Goyal.
3.1 LANDS OF KOPP AND NICHOLSON; 27223 Sherlock Road: File 375-16-
MISC; A request to revise the LUF, MDA and MFA for the property based on a
revised topographic survey and to remove a deed restriction from the property
1
Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
November 3, 2016
title. CEQA review: Categorical Exemption per Section 15304(b) (Staff: S. Avila)
Planning Director Suzanne Avila presented the staff report.
Applicants Kay Nicholson and Kerry Kopp stated they were available for
questions.
The Commission asked questions of the applicants and received responses.
Chair Tankha closed the PUBLIC HEARING.
Commission discussion ensued.
Commissioner Mandle said that she had no objection to changing
the project's calculations.
Commissioner Basiji stated that due to the erroneous LUF and in light of the new
survey, corrections should be made accordingly.
Commissioner Couperus said Sherlock Road is fraught from the point of view of
the Fire Department and there are a number of actions being taken to try and
improve that. He stated that this was a subsequent effect from a previous problem
and it needs to be fixed.
Commissioner Partridge stated his support for the request.
Chair Tankha concurred with Commissioner Partridge.
MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Commissioner Mandle moved to approve
a request to revise the LUF, MDA and MFA for the property based on a revised
topographic survey and to remove a deed restriction from the property title. The
motion was seconded by Commissioner Couperus.
Motion Carried 5-0:
AYES: Commissioner Couperus, Commissioner Mandle, Commissioner
Partridge, Commissioner Basiji, Chair Tankha
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
2
Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
November 3, 2016
3.2 LANDS OF AGRAWAL; 24863 Olive Tree Lane; File 169-16-ZP-SD-CDP-
VAR; A request for a Conditional Development Permit and Site Development
Permit for an Addition to an Existing Garage with a Reduction of Floor Area for
the Main Residence, a Variance to Allow Required Parking to Encroach into the
Side Yard Setback, and Removal of one Heritage Oak Tree. (Staff: G. Fernandez)
Assistant Planner Genevieve Fernandez presented the staff report.
Commissioner Partridge inquired about the shading on the north elevation
drawing. Ms. Fernandez explained that it was a feature the architect used to show
shadowing.
The Commission asked questions of staff and received responses.
Applicant Gautum Agrawal spoke to the Commission on behalf of his project.
Commissioner Partridge asked for clarification on the reason for removing the
heritage oak tree that does not appear to affect the requested development area. Mr.
Agrawal explained the deteriorating condition of the tree and his safety concerns
on proximity to the main residence.
Steven Stept, Feldman Architecture, spoke about the reasoning behind the
request to remove the heritage oak tree. Mr. Stept stated his excitement of being a
part of this project. He elaborated on the functionality of the garage and
the proposal for guest parking.
Commissioner Mandle asked Mr. Stept if there was intent to restore the natural
grade around the large oak trees created by removing fill as per the arborist's
recommendations. Mr. Stept said the area that he was specifically referring to in
regards to restoring grading were the large wood walls in the back of the house that
had been retrofitted and that they are creating smaller scaled walls that are in
respect to the current nature of the design; he referred the tree grading to Erica
Deitchman, the landscape architect.
Erica Deitchman, Variegated Green, spoke regarding to the landscape and
grading plans.
Commissioner Partridge asked whether the driveway, being within the 10 foot
grading setback, was allowed because the previous driveway was in the same
location. Ms. Fernandez confirmed it was allowed.
Chair Tankha opened the PUBLIC HEARING.
Seeing no one wishing to speak, Chair Tankha closed the PUBLIC HEARING.
Commission discussion ensued.
3
Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
November 3, 2016
Commission Couperus noted that it is time for the property to be upgraded and
expressed his support.
Commissioner Partridge concurred with Commissioner Couperus.
Commissioner Mandle agreed with both previous Commissioners. She stated her
appreciation for the proposed remodel versus tearing down the house. She
expressed her support for the variance.
Commissioner Basiji agreed with the three previous Commissioners. He
highlighted his support for minimizing the MDA.
Chair Tankha said she concurred with everything that was previously stated.
MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Commissioner Couperus moved to
approve a request for a Conditional Development Permit and Site Development
Permit for an addition to an existing garage with a reduction of floor area for the
main residence, a variance to allow required parking to encroach into the side yard
setback, and removal of one heritage oak tree subject to the findings in Attachments
1 and 2 and the conditions of approval in Attachment 3 to the staff report. The
motion was seconded by Commissioner Partridge.
Motion Carried 5-0:
AYES: Commissioner Couperus, Commissioner Mandle, Commissioner
Partridge, Commissioner Basiji, Chair Tankha
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
3.3 LANDS OF DJNH, LLC; 26400 Eshner Court; File #226-16-ZP-SD; A request for
a Site Development Permit to construct a 756-square foot pool cabana adjacent to
an existing pool and barbeque area with related hardscape improvements. CEQA
review: Categorical Exemption per Section 15303(e) – construction of a new
accessory structure to a single-family residence in a residential zone district (Staff:
S. Padovan)
Consultant Planner Steve Padovan presented the staff report.
The Commission asked questions of staff and received responses.
4
Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
November 3, 2016
Applicant Jed York spoke on behalf of the project and said he was available for
questions.
Chair Tankha asked Mr. York if he had a chance to speak with the Clearys to
find a solution that worked for both parties involved. Mr. York stated that he is
open to possible solutions, such as screening and other options.
Commissioner Mandle asked if the Yorks were open to lowering the height of
their cabana. Mr. York stated that it would not be a major impact to do so if that is
what they need to move forward.
LauraMae Sarusi, Pacific Peninsula Architecture, spoke on behalf of the views
remaining relatively unobstructed.
Commissioner Partridge asked the meaning of a parapet. Ms. Sarusi stated that
the parapet allows the top of the roof to contain gravel in order to create a slight
slope for drainage. It functions as a containing wall. Ms. Sarusi stated that it can
potentially be lowered as needed.
Commissioner Partridge asked about the impact of reducing the parapet. Ms.
Sarusi stated that it allows for some curved ceiling on the inside but there is room
to reduce the height if necessary.
Chair Tankha opened the PUBLIC HEARING.
Gary Cleary, Los Altos Hills, spoke against the project, expressing concern about
the views from their cottage.
Nobuko Cleary, Los Altos Hills, spoke against the project.
Vicky Oldberg, Los Altos Hills, spoke against the project.
Jan Fenwick, Los Altos Hills, spoke against the project.
Tom Bruner, Los Altos Hills, spoke against the project.
Sophia and Jack, grandchildren of the Clearys, spoke against the project.
Applicant Jed York was invited to respond to the concerns that were voiced.
Mr. York stated that the Clearys had full disclosure of the project and did not
protest until the project went to the Planning Commission.
Chair Tankha asked Mr. York if there was room for compromise in regards
to height limit of the cabana, landscape screening, relocation of the air conditioning
unit, removal of the walnut tree, and the color of the cabana. Mr. York stated he
5
Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
November 3, 2016
was open to compromise with the Clearys in order to move forward with the
project.
Chair Tankha closed the PUBLIC HEARING.
Commission discussion ensued.
Commissioner Basiji stated that he was not able to easily see the cabana from
various positions near the Cleary’s property fence line. He suggested compromise
be made to satisfy both parties involved.
Commissioner Mandle stated that although she understood the concerns with
protecting the views, the Cleary’s bay views remain completely unobstructed by
the construction on the York's property. She believed adequate screening and
lowering the height of the cabana would suffice. Commissioner Mandle suggested
the landscape screening come back to the Commission.
Commissioner Couperus suggested that the objections have been overstated and
misinformed. He carefully analyzed the aerial views and concluded that the cabana
does not obliterate the Clearys’ view. He recommended that the color of the back
wall of the cabana be toned down. Commissioner Couperus acknowledged the
effort of the objectors but states that he has not been swayed in their favor.
Commissioner Partridge agreed the Yorks are in their right to have an accessory
structure of this nature. He stated his sensitivity to views and his belief that there is
room for compromise in regards to the structures height and landscape screening to
mitigate the Clearys’ modest view obstruction.
Chair Tankha agreed with previous statements from Commissioners in regards to
compromise and the need for the landscape screening plans to come back to the
Planning Commission. She expressed concern with the permit approval process in
regards to the concrete slab and her desire for this situation not to occur in the
future.
MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Commissioner Partridge moved to
approve the Site Development Permit to construct a 756-square foot pool cabana
adjacent to an existing pool and barbeque area with related hardscape improvements
with the added conditions that roof height in the region of the cabana be lowered
by 1.5 feet, the open outdoor roof may remain the same height, that the landscape
screening plan be reviewed by the Planning Commission and that the reflectivity of
the cabana conform to code. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Mandle.
6
Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
November 3, 2016
Motion Carried 5-0:
AYES: Commissioner Couperus, Commissioner Mandle, Commissioner
Partridge, Commissioner Basiji, Chair Tankha
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
3.4 LANDS OF GOYAL; 12386 Priscilla Lane; File #27-16-ZP-SD-GD; Requesting
an amendment to a condition of approval regarding Light Reflectivity Value
(LRV) limitations for a previously approved Site Development Permit for a new
6,242 square foot two story residence with a 3,733-square foot basement and
attached secondary dwelling unit. CEQA review: Categorical Exemption per
Section 15303 (a) and (e) (Staff: M. Moseley)
Chair Tankha recused herself from item 3.4 and stepped down from the dais.
Senior Planner Marni Moseley presented the staff report.
Commissioners asked questions of staff and received responses.
Commissioner Partridge opened the PUBLIC HEARING.
Applicant Sonny Goyal spoke on behalf of his project.
Commission asked question of the applicant and received his responses.
Scott Stotler, Stotler Design Group, spoke on behalf of the project design.
Commissioner Partridge asked about the process used to approve a stucco color.
Director Avila explained that stucco color is usually approved based on the
manufacturer's paint number or matched to paint samples with the Light
Reflectivity Value (LRV) identified.
Manjal Shah, Los Altos Hills, spoke in favor of the project.
Commission discussion ensued.
Commissioner Partridge closed the PUBLIC HEARING.
Commissioner Mandle stated her opposition on granting an exception to the Light
Reflectivity Value (LRV) condition.
7
Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
November 3, 2016
Commissioner Couperus stated that color is relative to context and for this reason
he is not in favor of relaxing LRV rules.
Commissioner Basiji expressed concern for the precedent it sets for other
residences. He stated his opposition for granting an exception.
Commissioner Partridge agreed with fellow Commissioners. He spoke in regards
to changing policy on City Council level. He said that making exceptions would be
a mistake for the Town.
MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Commissioner Basiji moved to deny the
request to an amendment to a condition of approval regarding Light Reflectivity
Value (LRV) limitations for a previously approved Site Development Permit for a
new 6,242 square foot two story residence with a 3,733-square foot basement and
attached secondary dwelling unit (Maximum height 27’). The motion was seconded
by Commissioner Mandle.
Motion Carried 4-0-1:
AYES: Commissioner Couperus, Commissioner Mandle, Commissioner
Partridge, Commissioner Basiji
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Chair Tankha
4. OLD BUSINESS
4.1 FAR/Substandard Lots Update (Staff: S. Avila)
The Commission discussed the Council action on substandard lot regulations. No
action was taken.
5. NEW BUSINESS - None
Commissioner Mandle, Commissioner Partridge, and possibly Chair
Tankha have conflicts with the scheduled January 5, 2017 Planning Commission
Meeting. The meeting will be rescheduled if necessary.
6. REPORTS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
6.1 Planning Commission Representative for November 17 – Commissioner Basiji
8
Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
November 3, 2016
6.2 Planning Commission Representative for December 15 – Commissioner Partridge
6.3 Planning Commission Representative for January 19 – Commissioner Tankha
6.4 Planning Commission Representative for February 16 – Commissioner Mandle
7. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - None
8.
REPORTS FROM FAST TRACK MEETINGS - None
9. REPORTS FROM SITE DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS – OCTOBER.
9.1
LANDS OF WANG & LI, 26096 Todd Lane; File #251-16-ZP-SD; A request for
a Site Development Permit for a landscape screening, lighting and fencing plan for
a previously approved new residence, pool and cabana. CEQA review:
Categorical Exemption per Section 15304(b) (Staff: S. Avila)
Planning Director Suzanne Avila reviewed the Site Development Hearing for
26096 Todd Lane.
10. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 10:15 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Veronica Flores
Veronica Flores
Administrative Technician
The minutes of the November 3, 2016 regular Planning Commission meeting were approved as
corrected at the March 2, 2017 regular Planning Commission meeting.
9
Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
November 3, 2016