Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/15/2001 i iMinutes of a Regular Meeting November 15, 2001 Town of Los Altos Hills City Council Regular Meeting Thursday,November 15, 2001, 6:00 P.M. Council Chambers, 26379 Fremont Road 1. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Casey called the Regular Meeting of the City Council to order at 6:05 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Town Hall. Present: Mayor Casey and Councilmembers Cheng, Fenwick and O'Malley Absent: Councilmember Finn Staff: City Manager Maureen Cassingham, City Attorney Sandy Sloan, Public Works Director/City Engineer Mintze Cheng, • Planning Director Carl Cahill, Planning Consultant Drummond Buckley and City Clerk Pat Dowd Press: Liz Cloutman,Los Altos Town Crier MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Fenwick, seconded by O'Malley and passed unanimously by all members present to add the following items to the agenda as urgency items: Adoption of a resolution awarding a contract for the replacement/repair of a retaining wall on Elena Road and Approval of a conceptual design for the new Town Hall. Casey also noted that item 6.1 and 11.5 would be discussed together as the issues were related. Casey referred to the recent Town-wide mailing requesting residents' email addresses and/or fax numbers so they could be contacted in emergency situations. Casey noted that recently there had been a burglary on Normandy Lane and she cautioned residents to be careful. She also stated that this was the type of information that would be sent to alert residents. 2. APPOINTMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS November 15, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 1 3. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT The Planning Director reported that the following application was discussed at the 11/8/01 Planning Commission Meeting: Request for a site development permit and conditional use permit for the placement of three antennas on an existing pole and equipment within an existing telecommunication facility, Lands of California Department of Transportation — Metro PCS, 2350 Old Page Mill Road — continued. The Planning Commission also saw a "Meeting Management" video during their meeting. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Cheng, seconded by Fenwick and passed by the following roll call vote to approve the Consent Calendar, specifically: 4.1 Approved Minutes: November 1, 2001 (Regular Meeting) AYES: Councilmembers Cheng,Fenwick and O'Malley NOES: None ABSTAIN: Mayor Casey(not present at November 1, 2001 City Council Meeting) • ABSENT: Councilmember Finn 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 5.0 Approval of conceptual design for the new Town Hall Casey reported that she and Fenwick had worked with the architects on design modifications for the new Town Hall. The plan before Council was the result of these discussions. The focus was on community areas with a pleasant but efficient space for offices. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by O'Malley, seconded by Cheng and passed unanimously by all members present to approve the conceptual plan diagram for the new Town Hall as prepared by Goldman Architects dated 11/14/01. PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To appoint Jan Fenwick and Ruth Rogers Co-Chairmen of the fundraising efforts for the new Town Hall. Mayor Pro Tem Fenwick and Councilmember Cheng were appointed Council liaisons and Finance Committee Members Lall Jain and Wilfred Corrigan were also appointed to the committee. 5.1 Update on Mayor's Goals and Objectives for FY 2001-02 • November 15 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 2 Sa) Break ground for a new Town Hall funded by resident donations. The conceptual design for the new Town Hall has been approved and the fundraising committee has been appointed. The architect will be preparing plans based on the conceptual design approved by Council. b) Complete the building and planning fee study and revise fees in accordance with State law. Maximus,the consultant conducting the fee study, will complete their work in January/February 2002 for consideration by Council with the mid-year budget. c) Implement a Resident Customer Satisfaction Survey Program. This survey was implemented by the Planning Department on September 1, 2001. Surveys are being received and staff will periodically report the results to Council. d) Complete an analysis of all Town codes, policies`"and ordinances for consistency, relevance and conformance with the General Plan. The Municipal Code and Policy Review Committee would be presenting their report on conservation easements later in this Council Meeting and they planned to review fences • and driveways next. e) Have broadband internet access available to all residents PacBell is scheduled to complete Project Pronto, their Town-wide DSL project, by the end of the first quarter 2002. f) Adopt and implement a town pathway policy which includes a specific five- year program for the new construction of along side the road paths and a plan which improves the maintenance and materials of current town pathways. On 11/1/O1 staff completed a draft existing pathway map in autocad format. We are receiving input/comments from citizens to complete this initial phase of our existing pathways mapping. Our next step is to collect off-road pathway easement information and reflect them in autocad overlay. This information will be brought back to Council when completed. g) Complete the review of setbacks and height limits and revise town ordinances accordingly. The Planning Commission is continuing their review of these ordinances. November 15,2001 Regular City Council Meeting 3 h) Continue to explore alternatives to underground all utilities in Los Altos • Hills. The City Attorney noted that the meeting scheduled for 11/13/01 with bond counsel had been cancelled due to a conflict. It would be rescheduled after Thanksgiving. i) Adopt a plan for the highest and best use of town property for all town residents. (Los Altos Hills owns 27 parcels totaling 168.04 acres of unused and/or underutilized property.) Fifteen parcels had been determined to have no restrictions on them. Title reports on these parcels will be available early in 2002 for Council's review. The deeds for these parcels have been received and it appears that twelve parcels have potential. j) Approve a five-year capital spending budget to assure the infrastructure of the Town is sound. Completed An additional goal was added: k) Joint Meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission • A Joint Meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission has been scheduled for Thursday, December 6h at 6:00 p.m. This meeting will be a Study Session to review planning issues. 5.2 Approval of Town-wide public hearing notice for proposed ordinance changes regarding covered parking requirements and new carport construction PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To approve the Town-wide public hearing notice for proposed ordinance changes regarding covered parking requirements and new carport construction as drafted by staff. 5.3 Report on Refuse Rates The City Manager had provided Council for their reference results from the Armanino McKenna LLP Bay Area Refuse Disposal Rate Survey of Summer 2001. According to this survey Los Altos Hills rates are slightly lower than the `like cities' average for residential and commercial pick up. The City Manager also noted that the franchise agreement with the Los Altos Garbage Company would terminate in September, 2003 and she asked direction from the Council as to whether they wanted to go out to bid or renegotiate with LAGCO. November 15, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 4 Bill Jones, Los Altos Garbage Company, commented on the electronic billing which • was now available and which was very successful. He also noted that an automatic clearing house was now in place. Mr. Jones commented on the different services provided for different communities and thus the resulting cost differences. PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To direct staff to begin negotiations with the Los Altos Garbage Company for contract renewal. Council liaison for these negotiations will be Councilmember O'Malley. 5.4 Approval of Resolution designating the City Manager to act as agent on behalf of the Town of Los Altos Hills for obtaining Federal and State disaster assistance—Reso# PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To adopt Resolution #80-01 designating the City Manager to act as agent on behalf of the Town of Los Altos Hills for obtaining Federal and State Disaster Assistance. 6. NEW BUSINESS 6.1 Santa Clara Valley Water District request for an agreement for assignment and assumption of storm drain easement on the Lands of Rogez, 15617 Fremont Road—Reso # • This item was moved on the agenda to discuss with Item 11.5. 6.2 Request for approval of a Park Bond Act Application for playground equipment at the Little League Fields Lisa Dorrian, member of the Parks and Recreation Committee, addressed Council with the committee's recommendation for playground equipment at the Little League Fields. She noted that they were working on the development of a plan that would provide a safe playground for the kids while the parents were watching the older children in the little league games. Toward this end this project would include fencing and netting. In addition drainage issues in that area needed to be addressed. The estimated total costs for this project are $41,220 which includes $7,500 for site preparation, $32,020 for acquisition and installation of the equipment and $1,500 for netting over and fencing the area. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Cheng, seconded by O'Malley and passed unanimously to approve the Park and Recreation Committee's recommendation to fund the Purissima Road Playing Fields Playground Equipment Project using Roberti-Z'Berg-Harris Block Grant Funds and Local Matching Funds. 6.3 Discussion of Sanitary Sewer Capacity November 15, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 5 The City Engineer/Director of Public Works referred to her report on the current • sewer status in the Town and her recommendation that a sewer master plan for the Town be completed as soon as possible. Currently there are about 800 lots in the Town using the sewer system in the Los Altos Basin and about 660 lots in the Palo Alto Basin. Last March staff became aware that Los Altos had accepted excess capacity sewer fees beyond the 1,100 connections agreed to between the Town and the City of Los Altos per their 1985 sewer agreement. Los Altos agreed to undertake a Sewer Master Plan for the Los Altos Basin with the Town participating. Due to delays it is now estimated that this project will take 30 months to complete. In the meantime annexation requests are being received and it appears they are being made for the purpose of obtaining sewers. The City of Los Altos is reluctant to grant additional connection rights to residences outside of Los Altos given their own demands on their system. Currently the Los Altos Sewer Basin conveys about 3.2 million gallons per day to the Water Quality Control Plant and this 3.2 mpd is about 89% of the sewer capacity that Los Altos retains with the Water Quality Control Plant. Regarding the Palo Alto Basin there is sufficient capacity remaining to serve the Town's current and future residents. Casey suggested trading sewer capacity between Palo Alto and Los Altos as a means of assisting those currently coming to the Town with annexation requests. She believed if one area had more than enough and another not enough to trade made sense. The City Engineer/Director of Public Works urged Council not to consider the trading option until the Master Sewer Plan had been completed. Allan Epstein, 23828 Ravensbury, stated that it did not make sense to penalize the southern part of the Town for the benefit of the northern part. The problem could be fixed now and put aside for 5 — 10 years. He asked that the reallocation be done now to address the current needs. PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To direct the City Manager to meet with the City Manager of Los Altos to discuss sewer capacity and the possible option of trading Palo Alto for Los Altos sewer rights. 6.4 Report on State Budget The City Manager stated that early indications were that the State of California was looking to take revenues away from local governments to fill the deficit in the FY 2002-03 State budget. One option was the $3.7 billion in the Vehicle License Fees backfill to solve the budget deficit. Loss of the VLF backfill would result in an estimated $305,589 reduction in VLF revenue to the Town. PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To direct the City Manager to prepare a letter to the Governor for Council's signature stating the Town's strong opposition to any consideration of reducing the statutory backfill of vehicle license fee (VLF) revenues to cities and counties. November 15, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 6 • 6.5 Adoption of a resolution awarding a contract for the replacement/repair of a retaining wall on Elena Road MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Fenwick, seconded by Cheng and passed unanimously by all members present to adopt Resolution#81-01 awarding a contract to GradeTech, Inc. for the replacement/repair of a retaining wall on Elena Road. 7. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES, SUB-COMMITTEES, AND COUNCII,MEMBERS ON OUTSIDE AGENCIES 7.1 Municipal Code and Policy Review Committee 7.1.1 Discussion of Conservation Easement Policy Evan Wythe, Chairman of the Municipal Code and Policy Review Committee, presented the report from the committee on the issue of a conservation easement policy. He noted that the committee had reviewed the Design Guidelines and the Town's Municipal Code concerning the goals and restrictions of conservation easements. According to the Design Guidelines, the following applied to conservation easements: 30% slope; may be placed over mature groves of oak trees; plantings and development to be approved by the Planning Commission and City • Council; natural hillsides maintained; and a portion of land on which no structure may be built. The committee determined that the grading policy already limited grading on a 30% slope without a permit and conservation easements may-not be needed as a means to restrict grading. They also determined that it was probably unnecessary to preserve oak trees by creating conservation easements given that mature trees and oak trees are already protected by sections in the Town's Code. Concerning the statement that plantings and development be approved by the Planning Commission and City Council, the committee asked if this was to ensure hill stability or was it an aesthetic issue. If aesthetic they felt that there should be public input and perameters should be set. Regarding the maintenance of natural hillsides,the committee thought this too was an aesthetic issue and needed public input. Also hillsides with plantings, vineyards and other landscaping should be considered. The basic question the committee felt needed to be answered was whether or not the Town wanted to have conservation easements. Sandra Humphries, member of the Environmental Design and Protection Committee, said the reason for conservation easements on 30%+ slopes was to keep the land relatively undisturbed. She further commented that native habitats and leaf fallings created a sponge which held the rain water and in dry weather let the water out. Cheng, Fenwick and O'Malley stated that they did not have strong feelings one way or another regarding conservation easements. Casey stated that she had some concerns about conservations easements. She believed that in some cases they did not protect the environment and caused the owners a lot of problems. November 15, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 7 • Casey stated that concerning the location of conservation easements over creeks, she wanted the Planning Director to provide the Planning Commission with exactly what the Town is mandated to do by other agencies in this regard prior to the Commission's public hearing on this issue. PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To send the committee's recommendations to the Planning Commission for review and recommendations and to schedule a Town-wide mailing when the conservation easement policy was scheduled for a public hearing by the City Council. - 7.2 Santa Clara County Cities Association PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To appoint Mayor Pro Tem Fenwick the alternate representative to the Santa Clara County Cities Association. 7.3 Santa Clara Valley Water District PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To appoint Councilmember O'Malley the Town's representative to the Santa Clara Valley Water Commission and the Santa Clara Valley Water District's Northwest Flood Control Advisory Committee 7.4 Santa Clara County Cities Association • O'Malley reported that he had attended a recent meeting on behalf of the Mayor and one of the topics of discussion had been County emergency planning measures. Favorable comments were received on the Town's recent postcard mailing requesting fax and/or email numbers for emergency mailings. O'Malley also suggested putting the disaster plan on the Town's website. 7.5 Northwest Flood Control Advisory Committee Fenwick reported that at a recent meeting they had discussed the vulnerability of local water sources to terrorist activities and the positive steps in place to prevent such disasters. 7.6 Volunteer Dinner Council suggested the following dates for the Volunteer Dinner: February 8th, February 22nd or March 8th. The City Clerk would check with the Fremont Hills Country Club and caterer regarding these options. 7.7 Site Development Ordinance Committee Casey asked that this committee present their report to the Council at their 1/3/01 Meeting. • November 15, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 8 8. STAFF REPORTS • 8.1 City Manager 8.2 City Attorney 8.3 City Clerk 8.3.1 Report on Council Correspondence 8.3.1.a Letter from Mr. and Mrs. Philip Wilson Council agreed that the letter from the Wilsons concerning development on their property would be handled by staff. Casey referred to a letter received from the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors concerning the formation of a Policy Advisory Board for the Comprehensive County Expressway Planning Study and asking if Council wished to appoint a representative on this committee. Council decided to take no action on this request. 9. COUNCIL-INITIATED ITEMS 10. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR • Connie LeBeau, resident, commented that she had a passion to form a multi- community task force to share emergency plans, to inspire people to service and connect them with the appropriate agencies, to share needs and resources and basically to establish a USO at home. She saw this task force as having members from schools, churches, businesses, government agencies, youth groups, health agencies, etc. At this time she was asking for Council's support of this idea. PASSED BY CONSENSUS: Council supported Ms. LeBeau's idea for a multi- community task force noting that it was a great idea. Council asked Ms. LeBeau to periodically report back to them with her progress. Council also suggested that Ms. LeBeau contact the Santa Clara County Cities Association as a resource for other endeavors of this kind. Jan Fenwick, 28011 Elena, noted that at the 9/20/01 Council Meeting she had had to leave before an item she wanted to address came up on the agenda. The question was asked " Could one speak to an item that was on the agenda under Presentations From the Floor?" According to the statement on the agenda one could but at the meeting it was stated that it had to be an item not on the agenda. It was agreed the City Attorney and City Manager would review the wording on the agenda to make it more clear. • November 15, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 9 11. PUBLIC HEARINGS • 11.1 Request for a conditional use permit renewal for an existing/previously approved wireless communications facility comprised of panel antennas on the Foothill College Gym, Lands of Foothill College/Sprint PCS, 12345 El Monte Road Mr. Ivan Tjoe, representing Sprint PCS, commented that he was available if Council had any questions. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Cheng, seconded by O'Malley and passed unanimously by all members present to approve the request for a conditional use permit renewal for an existing/previously approved wireless communications facility comprised of panel antennas on the Foothill College Gym, Lands of Foothill College/Sprint PCS, 12345 El Monte Road 11.2 Request for a conditional use permit renewal for an existing/previously approved wireless communications facility Lands of Foothill College/Crown Castle/Verizon, 12345 El Monte Road The City Attorney stated that the Town did have jurisdiction over antennas put on the Foothill College campus. Concerning the antenna site under discussion, the City Attorney noted that the college gave Verizon a permit for this antenna in 1993 without Town approval in error. When they realized they needed a permit from the Town one was obtained in 1996. This permit runs with the land and has not expired. It is a legal non-conforming pole. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Fenwick, seconded by Cheng and passed unanimously by all members present to approve the request for a conditional use permit renewal for an existing/previously approved wireless communications facility Lands of Foothill College/Crown Castle/Verizon, 12345 El Monte Road. 11.3 Request for a site development permit and a conditional use permit renewal for the placement of six panel antennas on an existing pole and ten equipment cabinets within an existing telecommunications facility and negative declaration, Lands of Foothill College/Metro PCS, 12345 El Monte Road Karen McPherson, representing Metro PCS, commented that they were attempting to co-locate this line with Crown Castle so that it would be less obtrusive. Daniel Reidy, representing Crown Castle, noted that they owned the pole under discussion and they were requesting approval of the request from Metro PCS to co- locate. He stated that they were certainly interested in working with both the Town and Metro PCS to make this work. November 15, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 10 Al and Mary Jackson, 26088 Duval Way, stated their objections to this additional • application for an antenna site on the college campus because it negatively impacted their view. If it was adequately landscaped it might be less obtrusive. Fred Mueller, 26075 Duval Way, stated that they had a clear view of this pole from their property. He would prefer removal of the pole but would support mitigation measures if they were adequately done. Bob Stutz, 25310 Elena, suggested moving the pole to the grove of eucalyptus trees where it would be well screened from view. Robert Talley, representing Crown Castle, noted that they would not be able to screen all the way to the top of the pole because they need a line of sight. PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To continue this public hearing and direct the applicant to prepare a mitigation plan for this project. 11.4 Request for a conditional use permit renewal for an existing/previously approved wireless communications facility, Lands of California Department of Transportation/Verizon, 2350 Old Page Mill Road MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by O'Malley, seconded by Fenwick and passed unanimously by all members present to approve the request for a • conditional use permit renewal for an existing/previously approved wireless communications facility, Lands of California Department of Transportation/Verizon, 2350 Old Page Mill Road. 11.5. Request for an easement over Edith Park (Town of Los Altos Hills) for environmental mitigation purposes, Lands of Santa Clara Valley Water District, S.E. corner of Fremont Road and W. Edith Avenue — Reso Santa Clara Valley Water District request for an agreement for assignment and assumption of storm drain easement on the Lands of Rogez, 15617 Fremont Road—Reso# Casey noted that the Council had a responsibility and a vested interest to resolve these issues. She commented that it did not appear that there had been coordination between the Water District, staff and the residents on this project. Casey also thought the Parks and Recreation Committee should be involved. The Planning Director commented that according to the Water District if they don't get the easement over Edith Park then the Town will not get the Adobe Creek Watershed Project. However, the Planning Director questioned whether the Water District really needed this park area. The District appeared to be banking extra mitigation area. They were asking for 3.5 acres but needed only 2.6 acres to get the project done. November 15, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 11 • Jenny Micko, Santa Clara Valley Water District, addressed the Council on the Adobe Creek Watershed Project. She noted the following objectives of this project: reduce risk of flooding to properties and roadways; decrease the loss of property due to erosion; protect water quality by reducing erosion and sedimentation; protect and enhance the creek ecosystem; and restore a self-sustaining, multi-layered, native riparian forest. She noted that this project had been going on for many years and the Water District had already obtained the needed permits from outside agencies. If the Town asked for major changes to this project at this time it could delay this project two years and lower its standing on the priority list. Rudolph Moore, 25661 Fremont, commented that there had been communication between the property owners and the Santa Clara Valley Water District. He believed Mr. Rogez could have raised his issues earlier and Mr. Moore was now concerned about erosion occurring. Nancy Lippe, Los Altos, commented that she had lived on the property directly across from Mr. Rogez for six years. She believed the discussions with the Water District had been very forthcoming and the Water District was working very hard to make this project work. Ms. Lippe believed the important issue was what was the right thing to do to save the creek. She wanted a win/win situation and thought the longer the delay the more trees would be lost. • Wendy Ward, 14116 Seven Acres, stated it had been wonderful working with the Water District and she wanted to see this project move forward. If it did not she.was concerned .that she would lose a lot of property and that her pool would be in jeopardy. Eric Millar, Los Altos, noted that the park land had been given to Los Altos Hills with the stipulation that it be used as a park. He supported this use and did not agree with restricting access to the park. Mr. Millar suggested the Water District use other properties for mitigation purposes. Wesley Schroeder, Los Altos, concurred with Mr. Millar's comments. Jean Struthers, 13690 Robleda Road, briefly commented on the history of the long project. She agreed that there had been communication among all those involved but over time staff and plans had changed. She urged the Council to think carefully about this park and its importance to the Town as well as the path through the park. She questioned why the Town should be responsible for these mitigation measures when the Adobe Creek Project ran through many communities. She also commented that the Water District owned other properties in Town would would also work. Sandra Humphries, member — Environmental Design and Protection Committee, noted that the planned open wood fence would be removed in five years. Ms. Humphries also commented that the Town's correction of its drainage issues has compounded the drainage issue on the other side. November 15, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 12 • Mr. Rogez, Fremont Road, noted that the conditions for this project had changed. In 1997 he and the Town's City Manager Jeff Peterson had agreed to coordinate this project including the installation of the sewer and storm drain lines. Now the Water District wanted a blank check with no final design available for the project. So far trees have been removed but nothing has been done on the project. Mr. Rogez further noted that once the easement was given to the Water District there would be no controls over this project. Mr. Rogez stated that he was asking for a two month continuance and he did not really see that two months more would make any difference in a ten year project. Dave Struthers, 13690 Robleda, stated that the Water District has tried to meet the needs of the residents but the mitigation issue bothered him. He did not think that taking parkland and restricting access was right. The project needed to be done but the mitigation program was another factor. Peter Astiz, 13901 West Edith Avenue, concurred with Mr. Rogez. The easement under discussion was broadly drafted and there was no commitment from the Water District as to the final version of the plans. The scope of the project needed to be done. Richard Moze, Los Altos, supported the Water District and noted that this was a substantial channel because it was designed for prevention of the 100 year flood. Jenny Micko, Santa Clara Valley Water District, stated that they had a letter of support from the Town for this project dated 1996 and the environmental impact report had been completed in 1999. Concerning the mitigation issue she noted that they were responsible for the maintenance of mitigation measures and the proposed fence in the park area would be removed. She also stated that the design plans should be ready in December. Responding to an earlier comment, Ms. Micko stated that the Water District did not own three other properties in the area. Resident, 35435 Fremont Road, urged everyone to get on with this project. He believed the Water District had held its hearings and done due diligence. He did caution the Town however to be careful of the park. Casey stated that the issue was not whether the project should be done but rather what was going to be done. She was concerned about the community and its residents and directed the Santa Clara Valley Water District to work together with Mr. Rogez and Town staff on the unanswered questions surrounding this project. Fenwick commented that he had spoken with former Councilmember Elayne Dauber who had been very involved with this project and she supported the request for continuance. Fenwick also supported rerouting not removing the path. Cheng noted that if Mr. Rogez wanted something totally different it could possibly delay this project two years. O'Malley suggested putting a time limit on Mr. Rogez to submit plans and a time limit on the Water District to review them. He did not support delaying this project two years. November 15, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 13 PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To direct Mr. Rogez to submit his plans to the Santa Clara Valley Water District and Town within a 90 day period from 10/2/01. 12. ADJOURNMENT There being no further new or old business to discuss, the City Council Meeting was adjourned at 9:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Patricia Dowd City Clerk The minutes of the November 15, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting were approved at the January 3, 2002 Regular City Council Meeting. • • November 15, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 14