HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/18/2001 Minutes of a Regular Meeting
October 18, 2001
Town of Los Altos Hills
City Council Regular Meeting
Thursday, October 18, 2001, 6:00 P.M.
Council Chambers, 26379 Fremont Road
1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Mayor Casey called the Regular Meeting of the City Council to order at 6:00 p.m.
in the Council Chambers at Town Hall.
Present: Mayor Casey and Councilmembers Cheng, Fenwick, Finn
and O'Malley
Absent: None
Staff: City Manager Maureen Cassingham, City Attorney Sandy
Sloan, Planning Director Carl Cahill, City Engineer/Public
Works Director Mintze Cheng, Assistant Planner Angelica
• Herrera and City Clerk Pat Dowd,
Press: Liz Cloutman, Los Altos Town Crier
Casey announced the City Council's support of President Bush's suggestion that
every child in the United States send a $1.00 donation to the children in
Afghanistan. Casey asked that the children in Los Altos Hills also participate in
this program and send their donation to Town Hall to the attention of the
America's Fund for Afghan Children. The donations would.then-be sent on to the
White House from Town Hall as a show of support for this worthwhile effort.
Casey further announced that she had received a Presidential Appointment and
would be serving in Washington, D. C. as the Director of Intergovernmental
Affairs for the Small Business Administration. She would be also be continuing to
serve on the City Council.
PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To move Item 6.3 on the agenda (award of contract
for consulting services for geotechnical services)to the Consent Calendar.
2. APPOINTMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS
2.1 Interviews and Appointments to North County Library Authority
October 18, 2001
Regular City Council Meeting
1
It was noted that both Elayne Dauber and Dottie Harrison-Brown had completed
their terms on the North County Library Authority. Elayne Dauber did not wish to
be considered for reappointment. Dottie Harrison-Brown did wish to be
considered for reappointment. Councilmember Cheng stated her interest in serving
on this committee.
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Fenwick, seconded by
O'Malley and passed unanimously to appoint Emily Cheng and reappoint Dottie
Harrison-Brown to the North County Library Authority, each for four year terms.
2.2 Interviews and Appointments to Town Committees: Pathways
Committee and Environmental Design and Protection Committee
Council had received eight applications for the one vacancy on the Pathways
Committee.
Jon Craig, 12910 Cortez Lane, stated that he wanted to become more involved in
the community and he had the time to serve on this committee. He noted that he
favored property rights but also felt the path system in Town was very important.
Les Earnest, 12769 Dianne Drive, noted that he continued to work with the
Pathways Committee although he was not a member and he further commented
that several of the projects that he had worked on as a former member of the
County Trails Committee were now completed. Mr. Earnest reiterated his interest
in serving on this committee.
Mahmoud Kamanger, 24300 Summerhill Avenue, commented that he had been a
resident in the Town for about three years. He had attended some of the committee
meetings and noted his interest in serving on the Pathways Committee. He wanted
to help with the path system in Town.
DuBose Montgomery, 27464 Altamont Road, believed that the paths were a unique
and special heritage of Los Altos Hills and he wanted to help on the long-range
capital plan for keeping this path system. Concerning his opinion on.the off road
path system he suggested that residents be given an opportunity to object to an off
road path on their property but exceptions be allowed for emergency access, etc.
John Mordo, 27963 Vogue Court, noted that they had lived in Town for only three
months and he wanted to get involved in the community. He believed this
committee was an interesting one and would be a good way to get to know his
neighbors. Mr. Mordo suggested that off road paths be decided on a case by case
basis.
• October 18, 2001
Regular City Council Meeting
2
Carol Savary, 27297 Byrne Park Lane noted that she was a two year resident in
• Yrn � Y
the Town and wanted to become more involved in the community. She thought it
was particularly important to maintain the current path system.
Linley Lyman, 13770 Wildflower, and Carl Silverman, 13332 Lenox Way, were
note present. Mr. Silverman had indicated his interest in both the Pathways
Committee and the Environmental Design and Protection Committee.
Council thanked all those who had applied for this committee. They noted that
since there was only one opening on this committee, the applicants were
encouraged to apply for other committees.
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Finn, seconded by Fenwick
and passed unanimously to appoint DuBose Montgomery to the Pathways
Committee for a four year term.
Council had received two applications for four vacancies on the Environmental
Design and Protection Committee. In addition Sandra Humphries had indicated
her interest in being considered for reappointment to this committee.
Lysbeth Goodman, 11989 Rhus Ridge Road, commented on her interest in -
gardening and her interest in serving on this committee.
• Sharyn Brown, Chairman of the Environmental Design and Protection Committee,
reminded Council that it was .important that applicants for this committee be
available during the day to go on site visits, etc.
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Fenwick, seconded by
O'Malley and passed unanimously to appoint Lysbeth Goodman and Carl
Silverman to the Environmental Design and Protection Committee each_ for four
year terms.
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by O'Malley, seconded by
Fenwick and passed unanimously to reappoint Sandra Humphries to the
Environmental Design and Protection Committee for a four year term.
3. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
The Planning Director reported on the following applications discussed at the
10/11/01 Planning Commission Meeting: Lands of Hickman, 26500 Purissima:
request for a site development permit for a 1,000 square foot secondary dwelling
unit — approved; Lands of Santa Clara Valley Water District: request for an
easement over Edith Park for environmental mitigation purposes, S.E. corner of
Fremont Road and W. Edith Avenue — recommended approval; and Lands of
Goese, 13640 Burke Road: request for a variance to allow an encroachment of
patios and landings in property setbacks—continued.
• October 18, 2001
Regular City Council Meeting
3
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
Item Removed: 4.8 (Mayor Casey)
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Finn, seconded by Fenwick
and passed unanimously to approve the balance of the Consent Calendar
specifically:
4.1 Approved Minutes: September 6, 2001 (Regular Meeting)
September 20, 2001 (Regular
Meeting)
4.2 Approved Warrants: $718,672.75 (9/l/01 - 10/10/01)
4.3 Concurred with Fast Track Application approved by the Planning
Director: Lands of Loh, 26870 Taaffe Road: site development
permit for a new residence
4.4 Concurred with Fast Track Application approved by the Planning
Director: Lands of McCreary, 23750 Ravensbury Avenue: site
development permit for a new residence
4.5 Approved amendment to contract with Wilsey Ham for
engineering consulting services—Reso #67-01
4.6 Approved contract authorizing Mark Thomas & Company to
provide engineering consulting services for the Tracy Court
Bridge Replacement Project—Reso#68-01
4.7 Authorized City Manager to call for bids for approved CIP
projects—Reso #69-01
4.9 Awarded contract for consulting geotechnical services—
Reso#70-01
Item Removed:
4.8 Dedication of right-of-way and grant of pathway easement, Lands
of Mendez, 27581 Elena Road—Resolutions#
Casey removed this item from the Consent Calendar and asked that it be agendized
for additional review.
s
October 18, 2001
Regular City Council Meeting
4
5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
5.1 Approval of three-way stop signs at Dawson Drive and Rebecca Lane—
Reso #_
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Finn, seconded by Fenwick
and passed unanimously to adopt Resolution #71-01 approving and authorizing
installation of three-way stop signs at the intersection of Dawson Drive and
Rebecca Lane and to direct staff to look into the possibility of an additional stop
sign at this location.
5.2 Report on customer satisfaction surveys regarding fast-track review
process and site development permits
The Planning Director noted that customer satisfaction surveys were being sent to
all recipients of planning permits issued as of 9/1/01. He had provided Council
with copies of the responses and the program appeared to be well received. He .
would continue to update Council on this program. Council thanked the Planning
Director for his implementation of this program.
5.3 Update on Mayor's Goals
• Break ground for a new Town Hall funded by resident donations.
• This item was being discussed at the 10/18/01 Council Meeting.
• Complete the building and planning fee study and revise fees in accordance
with State law.
Maximus,the consultant conducting the fee study,will complete their work in
January/February 2002 for consideration by Council with the mid-year budget.
• Implement a Resident Customer Satisfaction Survey Program.
Report given by the Planning Director at the 10/18/01 Council Meeting. Program
in place.
• Complete an analysis of all Town codes, policies and ordinances for
consistency,relevance and conformance with the General Plan.
The Committee was working on their analysis and a report would be forthcoming to the
Council.
October 18, 2001
Regular City Council Meeting
5
• Have broadband internet access available to all residents
According to an update received from PacBall everyone in Town (except for a
section off Page Mill Road) should have DSL capability by the end of the first
quarter in 2002.
• Adopt and implement a town pathway policy which includes a specific
five-year program for the new construction of along side the road paths and
a plan which improves the maintenance and materials of current town
pathways.
Staff is in the process of preparing an inventory of all paths in Town—on and off-road.
• Complete the review of setbacks and height limits and revise town
ordinances accordingly.
These issues are currently being reviewed by the Planning Commission.
• Continue to explore alternatives to underground all utilities in Los Altos
Hills.
Report will be given at the 10/18/01 Council Meeting.
• Adopt a plan for the highest and best use of town property for all town
residents. (Los Altos Hills owns 27 parcels totaling 168.04 acres of unused
and/or underutilized property.)
According to Charlene Geers, American Title Company has offered to do the title reports
on the Town properties at no charge to the Town.
• Approve a five-year capital spending budget to assure the infrastructure of
the Town is sound.
Completed
An additional goal was added:
• Joint Meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission
A Joint Meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission has been scheduled
for Thursday, December 6`h at 6:00 p.m. This meeting will be a Study Session to
review planning issues.
October 18 2001
Regular City Council Meeting
6
• Dot Schreiner, 14301 Saddle Mountain Drive, suggested adding another goal:
General Plan Update with citizen input.
5.4 Approval of letter to residents concerning emails for emergency
notifications
The City Attorney noted that if the notifications were for emergency situations only
the information could be kept confidential. She further noted that the letter should
be sent from the City Manager and not the City Council.
PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To send a letter to all residents from the City
Manager requesting voluntary submittal of emails and fax numbers for emergency
notifications from the Town.
6. NEW BUSINESS
6.1 Request from Little League to have extra parking for Opening Day
PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To grant the Little League's request for extra parking
at their opening day ceremonies in 2002.
6.2 Discussion and approval of space design concept for the new Town
Hall
Casey noted that she and Mayor Pro Tem Fenwick were continuing their
discussions with John Goldman, Goldman Architects, on the Town Hall Project.
All Councilmembers now had copies of his recent submittal which showed
approximately 7,600 square feet for the new Town Hall.
John Goldman, Goldman Architects, referred to the document he had submitted as
a result of his meetings with Council, Planning Commission, staff and volunteers.
He also noted that the 7,600 figure did not include circulation areas.
Council discussed this proposed concept and thought it was too large for a new
Town Hall. They commented on current spaces and projected plans and agreed
that an appropriate range would be 6,500 to 6,800 square feet including circulation
areas.
PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To approve a space design concept for the new
Town Hall in the 6,500 to 6,800 square foot range including circulation areas and
to direct Goldman Architects to bring back diagrams and designs for the new Town
Hall within these perameters.
6.2 Award of contract for consulting geotechnical services—Reso #
October 18, 2001
Regular City Council Meeting
7
• This item was moved to the consent calendar.
6.4 Adoption of Ordinance amending Chapter 5 (Flood Damage Protection)
of Title 7 (Public Works) of the Los Altos Hills Municipal Code
regarding Flood Damage Protection (SECOND READING)
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by O'Malley, seconded by Finn
and passed unanimously to adopt Ordinance #416 amending Chapter 5 (Flood
Damage Protection) of Title 7 (Public Works) of the Los Altos Hills Municipal
Code regarding Flood Damage Protection
6.5 Adoption of Ordinance regarding regular.;,City Council Meetings
(SECOND READING)
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Finn, seconded by O'Malley
and passed unanimously to adopt Ordinance #417 regarding regular City Council
meetings.
6.6 Report on issues related to Undergrounding Utilities
At the request of Council the City Attorney had prepared a report on working with
PG&E and the PUC on undergrounding utilities and also on the formation of an
assessment district. She noted that because of the current situation with PG&E the
Town would need to do the work of underground utilities. Toward this end the
Town would need to negotiate with PG&E and the PUC to agree to the
undergrounding. The City Attorney further noted that it might be possible for the
town to underground utilities and own them itself but have PG&E maintain them.
In that case,the Town should negotiate a lower rate for the distribution system with
PG&E so that in return for owning the facilities less expensive rates would be
available. The City Attorney recommended that Don Maynor, an experienced
municipal utility attorney, be retained by the Town to proceed with these
discussions with PG&E and the PUC. Concerning paying for the undergrounding
and the possible formation of an assessment district the City Attorney noted that
when capital improvements are financed by bonds property owners may not defer
payment to when their property was sold. Such a district would need to be
financed by an outside source.
Amir Rosenbaum, Chairman of the Utility & Information Systems Committee,
commented on bonds secured by property value, municipal bonds, cost of
construction, and structure of the deal. He believed the funding was available but
first PG&E needed to be asked if we could do it.
October 18, 2001
Regular City Council Meeting
8
PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To direct the City Attorney to arrange a meeting with
PG&E including the Mayor Pro Tem Fenwick, Councilmember O'Malley, the City
Manager, Amir Rosenbaum and the City Attorney to discuss these options and to
to authorize retaining Don Maynor at a cost not to exceed $1,000 for a preliminary
look at these options and their feasibility.
6.7 Proposed Resolution to repeal Design Review Guidelines, exterior
colors of structures and fence policy and Site Development Policy
Statement— Reso #
The Planning Director referred to his staff report in which he noted that the
Council had directed staff to review the report from the Municipal Code and Policy
Review Committee (submitted at the 9/20/01 Council Meeting) and develop a
prioritized list for reviewing various design guidelines and development policies
and incorporating relevant portions into the Zoning and Site Development Code.
The following is a list, in descending order of priority, of the design guidelines and
policies that will be reviewed by the Planning Commission: exterior colors of
structures and fence policy; conservation easements; grading policy; driveway
design; architectural features and neighborhood compatibility; siting and high site
visibility; fences and walls and entry gates and columns; lighting policy;
development area and tennis/sport courts, driveways and impervious surfaces
policy; landscaping; and site development policy statement. In the meantime the
recommendation was to repeal the use of the design guidelines, the exterior colors
• of structures and fence policy and the site development policy statement in that
they are rather ambiguous and in some cases not consistent with the Town's Codes.
Dot Schreiner, 14301 Saddle Mountain Drive, commented that the four goals of
the Design Guidelines were taken from the General Plan: Retain and enhance the
open natural atmosphere of Los Altos Hills; Design your home to fit the site and to
be unobtrusive in the neighborhood; Design your house to minimize the
appearance of bulk; and Design for your needs,the needs of the Town and those of
your neighbors.
Carol Gottlieb, 24290 Summerhill, commented that the design guidelines were
referred to in the Town's Codes. She also suggested that the guidelines be revised
not repealed.
Jim Steiner, 14195 Wild Plum, concurred with Carol Gottlieb's comments. He
noted that the purpose of the design guidelines was to have a user friendly
document.
Ginger Summit, 13390 Lenox Way, commented that a vacuum will occur between
the repeal of the design guidelines and the completion of the committee review.
October 18 2001
Regular City Council Meeting
9
Evan Wythe, Municipal Code and Policy Review Committee, stated that they
intended to rewrite the design guidelines to be in conformance with the Town's
Code and the General Plan would be clearly followed during this review period. He
also noted that they believed the design guidelines was very helpful in the
planning/building process and simply wanted to clarify its contents.
Sandra Humphries, 26238 Fremont Road, asked if the rules in place needed to be
followed or could someone go back and change something previously approved.
She was advised that one could not go back and change the rules for the time of
their approval.
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Finn, seconded by Fenwick
and passed unanimously to adopt Resolution #72-01 repealing the design review
guidelines, the site development policy statement and the policy on exterior colors
of structures.
6.8 Establishment of an Emergency Communications Committee
Council had received a proposed list of charges for an emergency communications
committee. Scott Overstreet had reported that mailings had gone to the ham radio
operators in Town, a meeting had been held and several potential members of this
committee had been identified. The charges before Council outlined the
• responsibilities of this committee and once approved would be incorporated in the
resolution on committees.
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Finn, seconded by Fenwick
and passed unanimously to approve the establishment of an Emergency
Communications Committee with Scott Overstreet named the initial chairman and
Fenwick named the Council liaison.
6.9 Establishment of the Information and Safety Committee (combination
of the Safety and Utility&Information Systems Committees)
Amir Rosenbaum, Chairman of the Utility and Information Systems Committee,
commented that their committee had completed their charges regarding
undergrounding utilities and now that issue was with Council. Their committee
had not been meeting therefore on a regular basis. He did note that a common area
of interest between the two committees was that of dissemination of information
in an emergency situation.
Scott Overstreet, member of the Safety Committee, commented that they did not
see the benefit of merging the two committees. The Safety Committee worked on
issues such as stop signs,bicycle issues and neighborhood safety programs.
• October 18, 2001
Regular City Council Meeting
10
Casey thought this combination of committees would be a blending of talent and
expertise that would result in a new way of thinking.
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Fenwick, seconded by Finn
and passed unanimously to establish an Information and Safety Committee and to
direct Amir Rosenbaum to act as Chairman and arrange an organizational meeting
of the committee.
7. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES, SUB-COMMITTEES, AND
COUNCILMEMBERS ON OUTSIDE AGENCIES
7.1 Report on Town resolution on standing committees—Reso#
PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To approve the following changes to the Town's
resolution on committees: delete section 3.e. on assigning Planning Commissioners
to certain committees; Section 5.d.ii.d change to read: to meet with the City
Manager or her designee to render advice on pathway activities, priorities and
necessary maintenance as necessary; Section 5.d.ii.e change to read: to
communicate to residents the concepts and locations of paths and trails in Town as
approved by the Town Council; and Section 5.e.ii.a — add "and adults". Council
further noted that committees should let the City Manager know in advance if staff
representation was needed at certain meetings.
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Finn, seconded by Cheng and
passed unanimously to approve the recommended changes to the resolution on
committees and to agree to defer adoption of this resolution to include charges for
the newly established Emergency Communications Committee and Information
and Safety Committee.
7.2 COPS Funding Recommendations—Safety Committee
Council had before them recommendations from the Safety Committee for the
COPS funds which were available from the State for certain safety related
projects.
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Cheng, seconded by Fenwick
and passed unanimously to approve the following recommended uses for the COPS
(Citizen Option for Public Safety) funds as proposed by the Safety Committee: hire
a public safety officer ($57,000 per year), replacement of street name signs
($1,250); and purchase alarm system for Heritage House ($2,500). The total
estimated expenditure of the available COPS funds is $60,750.
7.3 Joint Volunteer Awards Committee
• October 18, 2001
Regular City Council Meeting
11
Fenwick noted that the Volunteer Luncheon was scheduled for November 30th and
letters had gone out requesting nominations.
7.4 Community Relations Committee
Fenwick reported that the Community Relations Committee had met on 10/16/01
and discussed plans for next year's Town Picnic as well as another Newcomers'
Party.
8. STAFF REPORTS
8.1 City Manager
8.2 City Attorney
8.2.1 Report on Bicycle Laws
The City Attorney referred to her report which included addressing the issue of
single-file bicycle riding. Vehicle Code Section 21202(a) implied that bicyclists
going less than the speed of vehicular traffic should proceed furthest to the right in
a single-file manner. However, this section did not require or mandate single file
riding all the time. Officers however patrolling in the jurisdictions of Cupertino
and Saratoga have enforced a single file riding requirement under Vehicle Code
Section 21202(a). The City Attorney concluded that while the Council could not
mandate single file bicycle riding in the Town, it could encourage single file riding
by encouraging the deputy patrolling in the Town to make citations under Vehicle
Code 21202(a) where appropriate.
Mr. Ed Dunn, Chief of the Foothill DeAnza Police Department, introduced himself
to the Council and noted that he was looking forward to working with them. He
concurred with the City Attorney's comments on single file bicycle riding in the
Town. In addition, for Council's information he noted that Foothill College was
about to start a major building project which should take about four years. There
would be impacts on traffic which they would work to minimize.
Council thanked Mr. Dunn for his comments and welcomed him to the Foothill
DeAnza College Community. Council also asked that Chief Dennis Bacon of the
Sheriffs Department be invited to the next Council Meeting to comment on this
bicycle issue.
8.3 City Clerk
8.3.1 Report on Council Correspondence
• October 18 2001
Regular City Council Meeting
12
9. COUNCIL-INITIATED ITEMS
• 9.1 Statement condemning hate related incidents and crimes (Mayor Casey)
Casey read a letter the Council had received from the National Association of
Letter Carriers. In this letter they stated their concern for the growing number of
hate related incidents and crimes throughout the country. In view of this they
requested Council to make an outspoken statement of condemnation and
committed prosecution of all acts perpetuated due to race or ethnic reasons. On
behalf of the City Council, Casey stated their support of the concerns raised by the
National Association of Letter Carriers and urged all residents of the Town to
strongly condemn any and all acts perpetuated due to race or ethnic reasons.
10. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR
Dot Schreiner, 14301 Saddle Mountain, expressed her concerns about the General
Plan update. She noted that this issue had been continued for the results of the
Municipal Code and Policy Review Committee. Mrs. Schreiner questioned this
approach noting that updates of general plans should have a large amount of citizen
input and participation and she did not see this happening.
Roy Woolsey, 26649 Snell Lane, raised the issue again of his neighbor's air
conditioning unit and the negative impact this has had on his property because of
the noise. Mr. Woolsey noted that in August of 2000 the neighbor had written a
letter stating that he would build a sound wall around his air conditioner to mitigate
the noise. To date this has not been done. Mr. Woolsey believed the Town's
review and approval process was flawed to allow this piece of equipment. He
further stated that the noise was loud enough to interrupt their enjoyment of their
deck and property and certainly as loud as the rooster which had been recently been
an issue in Town. Mr. Woolsey reminded Council that in that case they had taken
the comments of the neighbors into account and after attempts to resolve the issue
ultimately directed the owners of the rooster to remove it from the property. Mr.
Woolsey asked Council to please help him get this issue resolved.
11. PUBLIC HEARINGS
11.1 Request for a variance to exceed the maximum fence height of six feet,
Lands of Kruep, 27466 Sunrise Farm Road
Casey stated that she had appealed the Planning Commission's denial of this
variance based on the merits of the case. She noted that at the 9/13/01 meeting
there had been only three commissioners present and the Chairman had not
realized that he was in a position to cancel the meeting because of the September
11th events which caused travel difficulties and other disturbances. Furthermore,
Chairman Wong noted that he had not been able to visit the property. Casey stated
• October 18, 2001
Regular City Council Meeting
13
that the fence on the Kreup property was legal with the exception of the posts. The
variance request was for a trellis which would block the barbed wire fence next
door. Casey further noted that this barbed wire fence had been in place for about
thirty years and Council had no authority to require its removal.
Mr. Kreup, applicant, commented that he was sorry they all had to be participants
in this situation. He noted that he and his wife had made several improvements to
the property including removing old structures, enhancing the view,
undergrounding the utilities, siting the house to fit in and building it well below the
allowed maximum development area. The fence they had in place was there with
permit and was contoured to fit the land so it was not even six feet in all places.
They were asking for a variance to put in a trellis to block the barbed wire fence
next door and the posts to allow for this trellis had been left on the fence pending
the Council's decision . He noted it was much easier to cut them off if they did not
get the variance rather than trying to add them on. Mr. Kreup stated that they
would definitely protect the view corridor and were willing to work toward a
modification of this request to everyone's satisfaction.
Mrs. Kreup, applicant, reinforced her husband's comments and also stated her
concerns for the safety of their children around the barbed wire fence.
Paul Simon, 12271 Windsor Court, suggested mediation between the involved
parties and taking down the barbed wire fence.
•
John Metcalfe, 12933 Tripoli Court, did not support a variance for a fence over six
feet and also commented on the barbed wire fence issue.
Sandra Humphries, member of the Environmental Design and Protection
Committee, believed the problem resulted from allowing encroachments into
setbacks. By doing this there was no longer any room for landscaping to mitigate
such structures as the barbed wire fence.
Mr. and Mrs. Sasaki, 12922 Tripoli Court, explained to the Council their reasons
for opposing this variance. They believed it was an erosion of the Town's
ordinances and negatively affected the atmosphere of their neighborhood. Mrs.
Sasaki noted that this variance had been denied at the Planning Commission by all
three Commissioners present. She further referred to the mailing they had done to
over three hundred residents and they submitted letters and petitions from those
opposing this variance. She believed that neighbors and community feelings do
count when discussing this issue. In response to an inquiry from Casey as to why
the Sasakis did not get a variance for the fence on their property, Mrs. Sasaki
responded that because they were replacing an existing fence they did not know
they needed one. When they found out they did, they immediately applied for a
permit.
October 18 2001
Regular City Council Meeting
14
Steve Grimes, applicant's contractor, stated that the proposed fence was not to
designed to block the view but to block the barbed wire fence.
Brian Gilbert, 12930 Tripoli Court, stated that his mother was the owner of the
property with the barbed wire fence and they did not intend to remove it. The
neighbors knew about it before they moved in and he felt that people needed to be
responsible for their actions. He did however support the variance request as did
his mother. Mr. Gilbert pointed out that the information given in the letter sent by
Mr. and Mrs. Sasaki that the Gilberts had signed an agreement with the Kreups was
totally untrue and in addition his mother was perfectly capable of making her own
decisions.
DuBose Montgomery, 27464 Altamont Road, stated that he supported the variance
request.
Duncan MacMillan, 27345 Natoma, commented that aesthetics were in the eye of
the beholder. He personally would like to see the barbed wire fence removed. He
also commented that if a councilmember obviously felt strongly one way or the
other about an application maybe they should step aside.
I
Dot Schreiner, 14301 Saddle Mountain, noted that two variances were being
requested, one for the trellis and one to encroach into the setback. She also noted
that Council would need to make findings for approval and staff had only made
• findings for denial.
Mr. Kreup played a tape from the last Planning Commission Meeting of John
Miller's comments. Mr. Miller, 27462 Sunrise Farm Road, was unable attend this
meeting. Mr. Miller stated his support of the variance request.
Evan Wythe; Chairman of the Muncipal Code and Policy Review Committee,
stated that their committee was going to be reviewing the fence policy.
Denise Williams, 25462 Altamont, stated that she thought the variance was
unnecessary.
Stephen Pahl, attorney for Mr. and Mrs. Sasaki, stated that it was required that
findings be made for approving a variance. In this case he questioned that the
property was unique and also stated that the intent of the ordinances was not
supported by this variance.
Finn and Casey stated that they could make the findings for allowing this variance.
It was a unique situation with the barbed wire fence next door and six foot fences
were certainly allowed and in many locations in Town. Cheng, Fenwick and
O'Malley stated that they could not make the findings for allowing this variance.
All Councilmembers stated that this was an issue which they wished the neighbors
• could have worked out themselves.
October 18, 2001
Regular City Council Meeting
15
MOTION SECONDED AND FAILED: Moved by Finn, seconded by Casey and
failed by the following roll call vote to approve the request for a variance to exceed
the maximum fence height of six feet by eight inches, Lands of Kruep, 27466
Sunrise Farm Road based on the fact that the same variance had been given to the
neighbors at 12930 Tripoli Court thirty years ago.
AYES: Mayor Casey and Councilmember Finn
NOES: Mayor Pro Tem Fenwick and Councilmembers Cheng and O'Malley
Casey asked the Susaki's to provide a list of names they mailed to regarding this
variance issue.
12. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further new or old business to discuss, the City Council Meeting
was adjourned at 9:55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Patricia Dowd
City Clerk
The minutes of the October 18, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting were approved
at the November 1, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting.
October 18, 2001
Regular City Council Meeting
16