Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/04/2001 Minutes of a Regular Meeting January 4, 2001 Town of Los Altos Hills City Council Regular Meeting Thursday, January 4, 2001, 6:00 P.M. Council Chambers, 26379 Fremont Road 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Mayor Finn called the Regular Meeting of the City Council to order at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Town Hall. Present: Mayor Finn and Councilmembers Casey, Cheng, Fenwick O'Malley Absent: None Staff: Acting City Manager Bob Quinlan, City Attorney Sandy Sloan, Planning Director Carl Cahill, Public Works Manager Jim Rasp • and City Clerk Pat Dowd Press: Clyde Noel, Los Altos Town Crier LA ADMINISTERING THE OATH OF AFFIRMATION AND SEATING OF NEWLY ELECTED COUNCILMEMBER EMILY CHENG The City Clerk administered the Oath of Affirmation to newly elected Councilmember Emily Cheng. LB CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL, AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. APPOINTMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS 2.1 Appointments to Investment Committee and Pathways Committee Council had received an application from William Krause for the Investment Committee. Currently there are three vacancies on this committee. William Krause, 25855 Westwind Way, commented that he had lived in Town for 28 years and was interested in serving on the Investment Committee. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Casey, seconded by Fenwick and passed unanimously to appoint William Krause to the Investment Committee January 4, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 1 Council had received four applications for the Pathways Committee. Presently there was one vacancy on this committee. The position of a Town representative on the Valley Transportation Authority Bicycle Advisory Committee was also vacant. This person also needed to be a member of the Pathways Committee. Les Earnest, 12769 Dianne Drive, noted that he was interested in serving on the Pathways Committee as well as on the Valley Transportation Authority Bicycle Advisory Committee. He had served on both in the past. Bonnie Finsthwait, 26023 Torello Lane, expressed her interest in serving on the Pathways Committee. She was a long time user of the paths and in the past had been involved with the Sheriffs Department in their search and rescue missions using dogs. This program had used the paths extensively. She was concerned about the paths and their continuance. Ms. Finsthwait, when asked by Council, noted that she was not interested in serving on the Bicycle Advisory Committee. Ken Olcott, 12950 Brendel Drive, stated that he was an active user of the paths, a jogger and an avid bicyclist. He was interested in serving on the Bicycle Advisory Committee. Voting forms were distributed to Council and Ken Olcott received the majority of Council votes for the position on the Pathways Committee. The following motion • was made reflecting this majority vote. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Casey, seconded by Cheng and passed unanimously to appoint Ken Olcott to the Pathways Committee for a term of four years and the Valley Transportation Authority Bicycle Advisory Committee. 3. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT The Planning Director reported that two items were discussed at the December 13a` Planning Commission Meeting: Lands of Corrigan, 13445 Robleda: request for a site development permit for a new residence and a detached garage with an upper studio — approved; and Lands of Campi, 14190 Baleri Ranch Road: request for a site development permit for a 1,528 square foot bunker—denied. In addition, since the last report to the Council, the Planning Director had held four fast-track application hearings. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR The Mayor requested that Item 5.1 (request for a lot line adjustment for Lands of Dorrian at 25400 La Loma Drive)be moved to the Consent Calendar. 40 January 4, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 2 MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Fenwick, seconded by Casey and passed unanimously (with Casey and Cheng abstaining on the 12/7/00 minutes as they were not present at the meeting) to approve the Consent Calendar, specifically: 4.1 Approved Minutes: December 7, 2000 (Regular Meeting) December 28, 2000 (Special Meeting) 4.2 Approved Warrants: $933,712.03 (12/1/00— 12/3 1/00) 4.3 Approved resolution authorizing agreement with Lawrence Kasparowitz Consulting for contract planning services—Reso#1-01 4.4 Adopted resolution accepting grant of open space easement for pathway on Lands of Ginzton—Reso #2-01 4.5 Adopted resolution accepting grant of open space easement for pathway on Lands Of National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States— Reso#3-01 4.6 Issued Proclamation honoring Dr. Robert Gross for twenty years of exemplary public service to the Santa Clara Valley Water District • 4.7 Concurred with action of the Planning Commission at their December 13, 2000 Meeting: 4.8 Request for a Site Development Permit for a new residence and a detached garage with an upper studio, Lands of Corrigan, 13445 Robleda Road— approved 4.9 Concurred with Planning Director's approval of a Site Development Permit for a new residence with pool, Lands of Joffe, 14790 Manuella Avenue (Fast- Track Application) 4.10 Concurred with Planning Director's approval of a Site Development Permit for a new residence with tennis court, cabana and pool, Lands of Kalbach, 13221 West Sunset Drive (Fast Track Application) 4.11 Approved request for a lot line adjustment,Lands of Dornan, 25400 La Loma Drive 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 5.2 Discussion of Meeting Times for Committees i January 4, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 3 The recommendation from the majority of the members of the Safety Committee was to meet at 3:00 p.m. Casey however believed that it was important for the committees to meet at a time that was convenient for volunteers who worked. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Casey, seconded by O'Malley and passed unanimously to direct the Safety Committee to meet at 5:00 p.m. on a weekday of their choosing. 5.3 Review of basement ordinance The Planning Director stated that he would be preparing a staff report on this issue for Planning Commission review. Casey stated that the basement ordinance does not clearly address the issue and the Council was seeing unusual requests regarding basements such as the recent bunker issue. Cheng noted that basements should not be seen above ground. Finn and Fenwick believed basements should be encouraged but agreed that the ordinance needed clarification. 5.4 Review of Site Development Process at staff level Casey stated that she would like to see a study session scheduled with Council and staff to discuss the planning process at the staff level with the goal of achieving an • even more efficient process. The Planning Director suggested and Council concurred that this take place when there was a full complement of planning staff on board which would give a more balanced view of the process 5.5 Discussion of Town Code Section 2-2.102(b) concerning Planning Commission Currently there was a section in the Town's Municipal Code which stated that an action of the Planning Commission shall require at least three affirmative votes. In the City Attorney's report she noted that this was added in 1997 when the Commission was reduced from seven to five members. Apparently there was a concern raised at that time that if there was only a quorum of three commissioners two of them would be able to make a decision. Casey believed that the Planning Commission should have the same process as the Council. If there was a quorum of three Councilmembers two of them could make a decision. She further noted that Council had the capability of appealing a Planning Commission decision if they wanted to. O'Malley expressed his concerns about two commissioners being able to make a decision. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Casey, seconded by Cheng and passed by the following roll call vote to direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance amendment deleting section 2-2.102(b) which stated that an action of the • Planning Commission shall require at least three affirmative votes. January 4, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 4 AYES:Mayor Finn and Councilmembers Casey, Cheng and Fenwick NOES:Councilmember O'Malley 6. NEW BUSINESS 6.1 Approval of Plan of Service/Law Enforcement Delivery MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by O'Malley, seconded by Casey and passed unanimously to approve the plan of service for law enforcement delivery for fiscal year 2000-2001. 6.2 Request for retroactive reimbursement of sewer construction cost, Lands of Shao, Elena Road The City Manager presented his report which included the information that Mr. Shao had installed the sewer line on Elena for a total cost of$17,850. This line was accepted by the Town but due to some confusion Mr. Shao did not request a reimbursement agreement at the time. There is also some question as to whether this project would qualify for reimbursement since it was the Town's policy at one time to only reimburse the difference in costs between the installation of the oversize to the standard size pipe. One party has already connected to the line and two properties remain that could tie on. Council discussed this request and the equity involved of people paying for the connection to sewers made available to them. They also discussed if the ordinance on sewer reimbursements was amended how retroactive should the period be. Council noted that in this case and perhaps others there was hard documentation on the costs of the sewer line which supported such requests for reimbursement. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Casey, seconded by Cheng and passed by the following roll call vote to direct the City Attorney to amend the ordinance concerning reimbursement agreements including a retroactive clause of ten years based on the availability of hard documentation to support each request for reimbursement. AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Casey and Councilmembers Cheng,Fenwick and O'Malley NOES: None ABSTAIN: Mayor Finn 7. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES, SUB-COMMITTEES, AND COUNCILMEMBERS ON OUTSIDE AGENCIES 7.1 Council appointments to committees, sub-committees and outside 40 agencies January 4, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 5 PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To approve the following appointments ointments to committees, subcommittees and outside agencies: Committee Liaison Community Relations Bob Fenwick Environmental Design and Protection Steve Finn Finance Toni Casey Investment Committee Steve Finn Pathways Mike O'Malley Parks and Recreation Emily Cheng Safety Bob Fenwick Utility and Information Systems Committee Mike O'Malley Youth Commissioner Mayor Exhibit Curator Mayor Town Historian Mayor Volunteer Awards Bob Fenwick Appointments to Outside Agencies ABAG Bob Fenwick • Steve Finn(alternate) Community Health Awareness Council Rory Kaplan (CHAC) City Selection Mayor Emergency Preparedness Council Mayor League of California Cities -Peninsula Toni Casey Division Los Altos Hills County Fire Protection District Commission Bob Johnson Sid Hubbard Los Altos Senior Center Board of Directors Martha Hunton Win Murray(Alternate) North County Library Authority Elayne Dauber (term ends 9/01) Dottie Harrison-Brown Joint Powers Authority Library Board Emily Cheng Valley Transportation Authority Policy Emily Cheng Advisory Board Santa Clara County Library Commission Barbara Lamparter Dottie Harrison Brown Santa Clara Valley Water Commission Bob Fenwick Santa Clara Valley Water District Bob Fenwick Northwest Flood Control Advisory Jim Rasp (alternate) Committee January 4, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 6 • Santa Clara County Cities Toni Casey Association Mike O'Malley(alternate) Santa Clara County Cities Toni Casey Association Legislative Task Force Steve Finn Santa Clara County Housing and Community Development Citizens Advisory Committee Gloria Shiff Joint Venture Silicon Valley Network Toni Casey Council on Tax and Fiscal Policy City/Schools Breakfast Forum Peggy Esber Bicycle Advisory Committee, Santa Ken Olcott Clara County Transportation Authority Los Altos Sister Cities Bill Sun General Plan Committee To be determined/not currently active Council Sub-Committees: Newsletter Bob Fenwick • Solid Waste Toni Casey Steve Finn Website Mike O'Malley Review of Design Guidelines Booklet Toni Casey 7.2 Appointment to fill vacancy on the Solid Waste Commission of Santa Clara County No action was taken on this item. 7.3 Request from the Parks and Recreation Committee for approval of an expansion program for the Los Altos Hills Recreation Committee Rebecca Hickman, Co-Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Committee, presented her request to the Council for approval of funding in the amount of$17,100 for a Recreation Programs Director. She explained that the pilot programs they had undertaken this past year were very successful and there was great support to expand them. However, the committee had found that they were unable to continue to volunteer the number of hours necessary to keep the programs going. January 4, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 7 Valerie Metcalfe, member of the Parks and Recreation Committee, outlined the financial figures for Council on number of participants this year as well as projections for the coming year. Including the following programs — Horsemanship Camp, SkyHawks, Ohlone Camp, Gold Rush Camp, Gingerbread House Workshop, Dog Hikes and Artists Workshops—the revenue projection for 2001 was $19,820. Cheng stated that she had remaining campaign funds and gave the committee $2,400 for their programs. Committee members thanked Councilmember Cheng for her generosity. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Casey, seconded by Fenwick and passed unanimously to authorize the Parks and Recreation Committee to hire a Recreation Programs Director at a cost not to exceed $15,000 subject to review by the City Attorney and City Manager. 8. STAFF REPORTS 8.1 City Manager 8.1.1 Report on COPS Funding The City Manager reported that the Town had approximately $220,000 in COPS funds • (federal assistance funds). It is required that about one half of the money be used on equipment and the remainder may be used on equipment and personnel. The City Manager further reported that he had discussed this with the Safety Committee and the recommendation to Council was to use the funds on reflective street addresses and street name signs. According to the Sheriff's Department lack of lighting and inconsistent street addresses in Town are a problem. Casey questioned whether residents would really want reflective addresses and signs in.Town and suggested there might be better uses for the funds or perhaps they should be given to another city where there was more of a need. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Fenwick, seconded by Cheng and passed by the following roll call vote to accept the recommendation of the City Manager to use COPS funds for reflective street addresses and street name signs. AYES: Mayor Finn and Councilmembers Cheng, Fenwick and O'Malley NOES: None ABSTAIN: Mayor Pro Tem Casey 8.1.2 Report on televising Council Meetings Scott Vanderlip and John Harpootlian, volunteers currently putting the Council Meetings on the Hills2000 webpage, answered Council's questions about the current process. Mr. Vanderlip noted that in a one and one half month period there were 700 hits on the webpage. January 4, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 8 • MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by O'Malley, seconded by Fenwick and passed unanimously to concur with the City Manager's recommendation to defer a decision on this issue until the issue of remodeling or rebuilding Town Hall has been resolved. Council further directed the City Manager to explore the costs of using the Town's webpage for showing the televised Council and Planning Commission Meetings, continuing to use volunteers for this project. Council asked for this report the second meeting in February. 8.1.3 Special City Council Meeting The City Manager reminded Council that a Special City Council Meeting had been scheduled for Tuesday, January 9, 2001 at 11:30 a.m. to discuss the City Manager selection. 8.2 City Attorney 8.3 City Clerk 8.3.1 Report on Council Correspondence The City Attorney noted that she would be contacting Mr. Olcott to discuss his suggested sanitary sewer reimbursement agreement. • 9. COUNCIL,-INITIATED ITEMS 10. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR Ken Olcott, 12950 Brendel Drive, commented that he had prepared a revised reimbursement agreement for Council's review. He believed that the Town should be encouraging sewers in Town and should have reimbursement agreements in place which reflected this philosophy. Sandra Humphries, 26238 Fremont Road, noted that the funeral for Senator Cranston was �Y th.m. on scheduled for 3:00 p January 16 at Grace Cathedral in San Francisco with a reception following at the Fairmont. Kitty Lee, attorney for the Ginzton family, asked about the status of the pathway easement documents and was advised that these had been approved on the Consent Calendar. Ms. Lee thanked Council for their attention to this matter. John Harpootlian, 26435 Anacapa, recommended that the committees tape their meetings and also hold all of their meetings in public places. • January 4, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 9 11. PUBLIC HEARINGS 11.1 Request for a site development permit for a six foot solid wood fence and a minor variance to exceed the maximum fence height of three feet and locate the fence on the roadway side of the `reference line', Lands of Montgomery, 27755 Central Drive The Planning Director reported that in November two of three Planning Commissioners approved Mr. Montgomery's request for a fence. However, according to the Code such approvals needed three votes therefore the application was not approved and appealed to Council. Mr. Montgomery, applicant, stated that he had modified his request for a fence and was now asking for a six foot open fence 20 feet from the centerline of Central Drive. He also planned to plant a hedgerow of wax myrtle bushes adjacent to the roadway. He explained that he has experienced trespassing and vandalism on his property and he was making this request to protect his family and his property. Sandra Humphries, member of the Environmental Design and Protection Committee, noted that at one time a request was made for such a fence on the Packard property which was open land and it was denied. She questioned the fairness of now approving this request. Ms. Humphries supported putting the fence in according to the Town's Code. • Patty Seslo, 11900 Page Mill Road, was opposed to a fence being placed next to Central Drive. She stated that the banks on the side of the road were steep and she questioned whether plants put in at this location might not negatively impact the road. Ms. Seslo also did not think that Mr. Montgomery should be able to put a fence across the old path when in her opinion the new path was environmentally unsound. Hil Reiser, 27640 Red Rock Road, stated that he had lived on Red Rock for thirty years and he explained the issue of road right of way on Central. He did not believe a variance should be granted since Mr. Montgomery had cleared the land, removed the bushes thereby reducing his privacy and now he wanted it back. Mr. Reiser also believed such fencing and landscaping as proposed would restrict the line of sight on Central. Jim Patmore, 27650 Central, appreciated Mr. Montgomery's willingness to compromise by modifying this application for fencing and landscaping. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Casey, seconded by Fenwick and passed unanimously to approve a site development permit and variance on Lands of Montgomery at 27755 Central Drive to allow a six foot fence within twenty feet of the centerline of Central Drive subject to the conditions of approval and findings as made by the Planning Commission. • January 4, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 10 11.2 Request for a site development permit modification for a basement redesign to allow a"walkout"basement,Lands of Yanez, 26171 Moody Road Luis Yanez, applicant, stated that the ordinance did not say a basement must have dirt on all four sides therefore he believed the Council had the authority to interpret the ordinance. He stated he had revised his plans and the basement was still completely underground but he did question what was really meant by this phrase in the current ordinance. He stressed that one did not see his basement at all from the outside. Mr. Yanez further believed that the intent of the ordinance was to eliminate the appearance of three story homes, not intended to apply to one story homes above ground and one story below. Mr. Yanez had a visual presentation of his project to clarify his request. He was asking Council to interpret that the rear position of the basement/outer level that was wholly underground when viewed from the side cross section be defined a basement and therefore excluded from maximum floor area and he was also requesting revisions to the ordinance to allow walkout basements. MOTION FAILED DUE TO LACK OF A SECOND: Moved by Casey to approve the site development permit modification for a basement redesign for Lands of Yanez at 26171 Moody Road. Council discussed this individual request concerning basements and agreed that it would be more appropriate to review the basement ordinance first and continue this item. • MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Casey, seconded by Cheng and passed unanimously to continue this item until the basement ordinance was reviewed. Bob Owen, Los Altos, asked if Council would be considering courtyards outside of basements. He was advised this issue could be brought up during those discussions. 11.3 Introduction of ordinance revising Sections 10-1.242 and 10-1.505(a),(c)and (e) of the Los Altos Hills Municipal Code requiring minimum setbacks for HVAC (heating and air conditioning) and pool equipment from property lines (FIRST READING) Roy Woolsey, 26649 Snell Lane, recommended that immediate neighbors be notified when such equipment was going in even if it was not in the setback. He supported addressing and solving the problem while it could still be done inexpensively. Casey questioned whether this ordinance change was necessary. She noted that only one complaint had been filed and the house had been in place two years before the complaint was filed. The Planning Director noted that this could be handled at the staff level without an ordinance change. He noted that the location of such equipment could be identified on the plans at the time of public hearing. • January 4, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 11 Sharyn Brown, Chairman of the Environmental Design and Protection Committee, stated that they checked equipment now but in the future they would double check the location of such equipment. Council took no action on this item. 11.4 Introduction of ordinance amending Sections 10-1.5020 and 10-1.5030 of the Los Altos Hills Municipal Code regarding allowable development area and floor area on constrained lots and adoption of a negative declaration(FIRST READING) The Planning Director explained the proposed ordinance to revise development standards for constrained lots. Constrained lots are parcels which, due to their small size (less than one acre) and those lots greater than one acre with slopes greater than 10% have reduced maximum floor area and maximum development area. The current ordinance limits the amount of square footage to 4,000 for maximum floor area and 5,000 for maximum development area. Another category of restricted lots is a conditional development permit lot, which has a lot unit factor of less than .50. Conditional development permit lots are generally even more limited than other constrained lots and typically require variances to determine allowable development on the site. The proposed ordinance attempted to correct inconsistencies in the code and standardize and clarify the issue. Staff's recommendation was to increase the allowed square footage for maximum • development area from 5,000 to 6,500 and to not change the maximum floor area. Furthermore, the following formulas were being recommended: proposed floor area for lots with a lot unit factor greater or less than .50 — LUF (lot unit factor) divided by .50 (4,000) = maximum floor area; and proposed maximum development area for lots with a lot unit factor(LUF) greater or less than .50—maximum floor area plus 2,100 square feet. The following residents spoke in favor of the proposed changes to the ordinance on constrainted lots: Jim Abraham, 12831 Viscaino Road; Ronald Haley, 25390 La Rena; John Harpootlian, 26435 Anacapa; John Chu, 11650 Dawson Drive; William Bunting, 12109 Foothill Lane; Mahmoud Kamangar, 24300 Summerhill Avenue; Eddie Leung, 27754 Stirrup Way; and Charles Wiseman, 26666 Birch Hill Way. They believed the currently allowed development on constrained lots was too restrictive and the lot unit factor was confusing and did not make any sense. Jean Struthers, 13690 Robleda and Dot Schreiner, 14301 Saddle Mountain, stated their support of the slope density ordinance in place. They noted it had been in place for a long time, did not require a lot of expertise to understand and had been copied by many communities. The slope density formula also resulted in greenbelt which they felt attracted people to Los Altos Hills. They also noted that such changes to the constrained lot ordinance would grant those owners much more development than others in town. • January 4, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 12 Casey thought the slope density formula was confusing and should be reviewed. She encouraged looking at acreage only when determining development on a lot. Finn commented that in 1977 it was thought there were too many tennis courts being put on properties in town and the lot unit factor was put in place. Cheng, Fenwick and O'Malley did not support removing the lot unit factor without reviewing the entire issue. MOTION FAILED DUE TO LACK OF A SECOND: Moved by Casey to continue consideration of this proposed ordinance pending the establishment of a citizens' committee to review the entire lot unit factor issue. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Casey, seconded by Fenwick and passed by the following roll call vote to amend the zoning ordinance to increase the proposed minimum maximum floor area (for lots with a lot unit factor greater than .50) from 4,000 square feet to 5,000 square feet and to increase the proposed minimum maximum development area (for lots with a lot unit factor greater than .50) from 5,000 square feet to 7,500 square feet. AYES: Mayor Finn and Councilmembers Casey, Cheng and Fenwick NOES: Councilmember O'Malley O'Malley stated that he was not comfortable with these increases and supported staffs recommendations. • There was some confusion as to whether the motion had included the changes to the conditional development permit lots. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Finn, seconded by Fenwick and passed unanimously to reconsider discussion of Item 11.4 on the constrained lot ordinance. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Casey, seconded by Fenwick and passed by the following roll call vote to determine the allowable floor area on conditional development permit lots based on a formula which relates the lot unit factor to the 5,000 square foot limit, without requiring a variance; determine the allowable development area on conditional development permit lots based on the allowable floor area plus 2,100 square feet; and allow the Planning Commission to grant up to 2,500 square feet of maximum floor area for any conditional development permit lot without requiring a variance. AYES: Mayor Finn and Councilmembers Casey and Fenwick NOES: Councilmembers Cheng and O'Malley Elayne Dauber, 27930 Roble Alto Road, questioned the legality of noticing this hearing with a notice that was different from what was actually being considered at this meeting. is January 4, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 13 Because of the number of changes made to this ordinance, the City Attorney advised Council that at the next Council Meeting it would be again scheduled for a first reading of the ordinance. 12. CLOSED SESSION: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL— ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: Government Code Section 54956.90 -- Initiation of Litigation: one Case 12.A REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION The City Council adjourned to a closed session regarding anticipated litigation at 10:10 p.m. and reconvened at 10:30 p.m. Council returned to open session to report, if necessary, any actions taken. No actions were taken. 13. CLOSED SESSION: PERSONNEL: Government Code Section 54957: City Manager This closed session was not held. 14. ADJOURNMENT There being no further new or old business to discuss, the City Council Meeting was • adjourned at 10:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Patricia Dowd City Clerk The minutes of the January 4, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting were approved at the February 1, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting. January 4, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting 14