Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout43-05 • • RESOLUTION NO 4 3-0 5 Attachment A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS REQUESTING THE ALLOCATION OF FY 2005-06 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ARTICLE 3 PEDESTRIANBICYCLE PROJECT FUNDING FROM THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR THE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AT FOOTHILL COLLEGE Findings 1. That the Town of Los Altos Hills is not legally impeded from submitting a request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the allocation of Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 funds, nor is the Town of Los Altos Hills legally impeded from undertaking the project(s) described in "Attachment B" of this resolution. 2. That the Town of Los Altos Hills has committed adequate staffing resources to complete the project(s) described on Attachment B. 3. A review of the project(s) described in Attachment B has resulted in the consideration of all pertinent matters, including those related to environmental and right-of-way permits and clearances, attendant to the successful completion of the project(s). 4. Issues attendant to securing environmental and right-of-way permits and clearances for the project(s) described in Attachment B have been reviewed and will be concluded in a manner and on a schedule that will not jeopardize the deadline for the use of the TDA funds being requested. 5. That the project(s) described in Attachment B comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA. Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.), and that the Town of Los Altos Hills is in possession of the document(s) supporting such compliance, said document(s) having been made available to for public review and stamped by the County Clerk or County Recorder of the county in which the claimant is located. 6. That as portrayed in the budgetary description(s) of the project(s) in Attachment B, the sources of funding other than TDA are assured and adequate for completion of the project(s). • • RESOLUTION NO 4 3-0 5 Attachment A (Page 2 of 2) 7. That the project(s) described in Attachment B are for capital construction and/or design engineering; and/or for the maintenance of a Class I bikeway which is closed to motorized traffic; and/or for the purposes of restriping Class II bicycle lanes; and/or for the development or support of a bicycle safety education program; and/or for the development of a comprehensive bicycle and/or pedestrian facilities plan; and an allocation of TDA Article 3 funding for such a plan has not been received by the Town of Los Altos Hills within the prior five fiscal years. 8. That the project(s) described in Attachment B which are bicycle projects have been included in a detailed bicycle circulation element included in an adopted general plan, or included in an adopted comprehensive bikeway plan (such as outlined in Section 2377 of the California Bikeway Act, Streets and Highways Code section 2370 et seq.) 9. That any project(s) described in Attachment B that is a"Class I Bikeway,"meets the mandatory minimum safety design criteria published in Chapter 1000 of the California Highway Design Manual. 10. That the project(s) described in Attachment B are ready to commence implementation during the fiscal year of the requested allocation. 11. That the Town of Los Altos Hills agrees to maintain, or provide for the maintenance of, the project(s) and facilities described in Attachment B,for the benefit of and use by the public. • • RESOLVED, that the Town of Los Altos Hills attests to the accuracy of and approves the statements in Attachment A to this resolution; and furthermore, be it RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution and its attachments, and any accompanying supporting materials shall be forwarded to the congestion management agency, countywide transportation planning agency, or county association of governments, as the case may be, of County of Santa Clara for submission to MTC as part of the countywide coordinated TDA Article 3 claim. REGULARLY PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of May,2005. By: Mayor , ATTEST: - ;Cit lerk 110 • 43-05 RESOLUTION NO Attachment B APPLICATION DOCUMENTS: TDA ARTICLE 3 BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PROJECT Applicant: THE TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS County: Santa Clara Name of Project: Bicycle/Pedestrian Bridge at Foothill College Contact Person: Henry Louie Telephone: (650) 941-7222 Email: hlouie@losaltoshills.ca.gov Amount of Claim: $ 11,310 Type and extent of project (check and complete requested information Bike Path (Class I) ❑ (length) Bike Path (Class II) ❑ (length) Bicycle Route (Class III) 0 (length) Bicycle Parking Facilities 0 (num./type) Other Bicycle Facilities 0 (type) Bicycle Safety Education 0 Pedestrian Walkway ❑ (length) Other Pedestrian/Bike Facilities ® Bridge (type) Project Description: Replace pedestrian bridge over Adobe Creek adjacent to the Foothill College entrance road connecting to El Monte Avenue. Financial Plan: Below, please list project components being applied for such as planning, engineering right of way, construction, contingencies, etc. ; also provide project budget showing total cost of project and other funding sources. If this is a segment of a larger project, include prior and proposed funding sources for other segments. Project Components: Los Altos Hills Pathway funds and TDA Funds Funding Prior Application tad Year 3rd Year Total Cost Year Year TDA $11,310 $11,310 LOS ALTOS HILLS $78, 690 $78,690 PATHWAY Total $90,000 $90,000 S RESOLUTION NO 4 3—0 5 Attachment B (Page 2 of 2) APPLICATION DOCUMENTS: TDA ARTICLE 3 BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PROJECT Project Eligibility: YES?/NO? A. Has the project been approved by the claimant's governing body? (If"NO,"on YES the next page provide the approximate date approval is anticipated). B. Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding? If"YES,"provide NO an explanation on the next page. C. For"bikeways,"does the project meet Caltrans minimum safety design criteria YES pursuant to Chapter 1000 of the California Highway Design Manual?(Available on the Internet at:http://www.dot.ca.gov/ho/oppd/hdm/chapters/t1001.htm). D. Has the project been reviewed by a Bicycle Advisory Committee?(If"NO," YES provide an explanation on the next page). E. Has the public availability of the environmental compliance documentation for NO the project(pursuant to CEQA)been evidenced by the dated stamping of the document by the county clerk or county recorder? (If"NO"provide and explanation on the next page;and note that MTC cannot allocate funds to a project which lacks environmental clearance). F. Will the project be completed within the three fiscal year time period(including YES the fiscal year of funding)after which the allocation expires? Enter the anticipated completion date of project(month and year)6-30-2006 G. Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility, YES or has the claimant arranged for such maintenance by another agency? (If an agency other than the Claimant is to maintain the facility provide its name: E. Notice of Exemption to be filed with the County Clerk prior to final design.