HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/23/1965FL." -�TI3 �l C011-ESE=O 'I
TC'iiP ,OF 10S ATOS i-ITLL6
l ', GTE: T e'+ Rcr F Itiii E T C
y' -e lc ] rir-;; oC rhe Pla, ni r, CommisSior of ho To -in o� to Alto-
ar J
n Izy,i
a[ t.,( t.<. Toti�r 7Talis
, - %9 Fremont Road, Los &i`o: kill,
l i fora ia.�
:iC.LL u'L-y: .'d4: �ommisc-iorc c,h. by, Bunco~;, CarbGt'L, ib -i"
itres..:ice, Chairman ']iter
k E!"1': Co ni'tsioT'r Em.icI
CiTtiCir lr.�r'R.c. r a1.11IVL
I:iaToi
� ibcrt
Benlcy
1�PPR0� dc0F' T r
`u�ust 9,
19C-5.
A0T10 is
'sdopt i,.utus of Lutist 9, 196 as sabmiCted.
Pa0'I:ICi„: l:ibn c ; S3COi'I?: Frertica;
IT Y!,: S'e ss ed unanimous I
_ 1TOT-1 G I;i E1,111
nZ!-"o rnC_d r, c^ipt of th( !Teague o£ osri
1 Rev
r oC Lr l.isl at io;:.
r
Iror,
Rv:ch Ur' dr2 Subdivision Liao - Rcferra1 Froc' F_ ;7
o�icil
'�nr� o]
p orc
Io to o C
- n'r
L for R dccctio i-erbcck _t,,-
'n_..- -
aa_r
o_rt
a_ tLo, air i'-c-.rar.ion of Existing I i2one�.
,ial
th - anni zj-, Comrii- sion': i r: i;s of _^ug. 9,
IIC> jz-
U?, ��
ic:i applicri jc, ;. �_v trcr.•:. ro 2tr. I r eis for Clar3.-
1 ?101
- 'Co t.�” :aLlanc, r,qu9 ,c r.. <', for 'igi"at,]PfS Of 'i rijoi,
i p op
c ;n r ca th r 4 ire r i ic; r o J b 1 -c+.:
pt i t l or: r tl c r..riii c _tion ant -� rrarc
L r. n.-r:d ioi a r. d robot to _. 'r. ll'C' )•
pro? .
7 r owT,1 2i Eta, c sib ec ink;
thr. vari
, ,'nt,'P tJ1i:
7
I'm .lu etian
of setback requirement to ten feet (10') be approved as eub-
nittc d.
T n•II07I -clay; SECOITD: Prentice: Vote. Passed an. ninonsly
DIVInI0TMT- ()�' Li::-D:
C arriar�a Hill Part_ (308-65) 9 lots. Engr. Hans Illulberg.
hr. normz.n M. Cook, Developer, az-c'. dr. ITlulberg were
The mau ,;as discussed relative to improving the design o£ lots 4, 5,
and 6. Several means of achieving a more satisfactory dasisn were
proposos — possible acquisition of several of thc small nonconform-
ing lots in Los Altos Villa Tract, the abandonment of Kingsley irvenue,
,a,d the consideration of an 8-lot subdivision instead of the pro-
posed 9-lot subdivision.
T`--o was also made to the developer that Lots 1, , ..
mr 1 ,;u-,,divided later, at such time as sono of the ci ,l to s
in Los Altos Villa Tract might be acquired.
In vie;, of the discussion, the developer agreed {:o ithdraz
�p
( to consider adjustment of the lot lines to achieve a better
subdivi. stun.
Thc lentalive &lap of Carriage Hill Park (308-64) 9 lots tile: a4 t-
crainnitwout prejudice to be considered at a later c
_. Hemmetcr George T. (289-64) 4 lots. Engineers Riley and i�7oyd.
Com dissio librur suggested that 8'nc entire Hemmet er files b.: rc-
vie�cd in order to gain better understanding of what is desar�d..
L air. ^.e� -�cr pointed out that thr 2-loot subdivision rust bcoe-
plc.fod prior to the 4-lot subdivision boing consid. rtd.
that th( Commission could not properly make a recommend,: ion, bu-
coul;onl, c.-scne the map before 'than at this time.
;linutes of llic Council tIleeting of August 2, 1965 ware r�,aO ans s-
cussoe r l.t ivo to whether a Record of Survey or Final =ap I
e- proved was determined. that an extension of time mas 2
to filo a "inal i':!ep.
'^?.cal : Department's letter of July %, 1964 was r,'_ anJ con �.i
tions ro "..-i.scussed.
1,,-,js;r is over Lots 1 and 2 were iiscuscod as to whether o not they
vera eacli::;ivc anil revocable. Relative to this di ,cu:sion, r om...... ts
ire heard From Ecaers. Paddock, Ioncs, 5ha,: and l:rs .ec'em-
Tl Clairnn .Mum :r2tcd existing problercs WkiCn -:mould rs approval
of tr(• hn of d lots, namely, filing of the final nap of "1 on
d i on ( � 64), problE me rCpardrhg tho clarific ro of
qucstic, of ,nc Hsalth )e,pn: tment'a' conditions of Gppro�,11
to nlacem.:nt of homes on the lots, and conditional exa�p-Ci-oc for
Lot 2. _2_
Hemmeter con'd.
RFC 012: EHDITIOil:
That the 'Tentative 1,ap of George T. Eemmeter (289-65) CII -E,
4 lots be returned t:1c developer rithout prcjudico.
7.'0TI0r: Hibncr; SECOND: Prentice:
It Y, s ootn:dthat no notice was given to property owrars of the
con 'tional acception for Lot /t2.
r_ttention ..no celled to the Ilealth Department's letter of' :Mas I�T,
196, relativo to conditions of approval.
The Question vias called.
'OTE: !.YES: Ashby, Hibner, Prentice, Chairman -lL:r.
NOES: Tone
i.BST,,IiILD: Ben s or.
1v3SE'Iv'^1: Haveley
3. Pink Horse Ranch Unit 2 (305-65) 9 lots. Engr. George S. Solt".
The Tentative Map was referred back to the Planning Commission by
th, City Council at its meeting of August 16, 1965 for clarification
of the Commission's objections to the subdivision.
The City Cleric read the I�'linutes of the Planning Commissiol' of July 20,
1965 „hick clearly outlined tho objections.
payor Healey stated that there would be no need to re -schedule, a
hearing on the map, by the Planning Commission; that tic map coulc_ be
rcturn.(l to the Council.
ORDI=,CES
Prone.
30LIiTI OiIS:
vonc
,T,,JOURNiiE='dT:
10:3% P.
IJL MOTION: Hibncr; SECOSID:
Benson
,LXT REGTUR
i EE1'I1,G:
Monday, Septamter 13, 1965 at
7:45 P. I:" at th,;
Town Hall, 26379 Tremont Road,
Los -1tos 11ills,
California.
Respectfully submitted,
PiiUL 'J; . S!=EN
City Clerk
To,rm of hos i"Ltos FIi11s
�V-2J-65
']m