Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/11/1991APPROVED PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS 26379 FREMONT ROAD LOS ALTOS HILLS, CALIFORNIA WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11TH, 1991 cc: Cassettes #14-91(l),14-91(2) 1. ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chairman Noel called the Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Town Hall. Present: Chairman Noel and Commissioners Cheng, Comiso, Ellinger, Jones, Pahl Absent: Commissioner Stutz Staff: Bill Ekern, Director of Public Works; Margaret Netto, Planning Consultant; Laura Johnson, Planning Secretary Commissioner Jones arrived at 7:40 p.m. 2. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR There were no presentations from the floor. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Pahl, seconded by Comiso and passed by consensus to approve the consent calendar, specifically: 3.1 LANDS OF MERRILL, 25355 La Loma Drive, APN 336 -32 -009,185 -91 -TM: Acceptance of an application for a tentative subdivision map. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.1 LANDS OF CHAN, 23531 El Caminito Road: A request for a Site Development permit for an addition/ remodel Margaret Netto introduced this item noting the project conforms to the provisions of the Zoning and Site Development Ordinance. L The Public Hearing was opened. LJ PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 11, 1991 Page 2 Johni Chan, applicant, introduced himself. In response to a question from Commissioner Pahl, Mr. Chan noted he had read and had no problems with the Staff Recommended Conditions of Approval. The Public Hearing was closed. MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Comiso, seconded by Pahl and passed to approve the Site Development permit for an addition/remodel with Staff Recommended Conditions 1 - 6. AYES: Chairman Noel and Commissioners Cheng, Comiso, Ellinger, Pahl NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Jones, Stutz 4.2 LANDS OF CODISPOTI/SCHROEDER, 14545 Manuella Road: A request for a Site Development permit for a New Residence and Swimming Pool Margaret Netto introduced this item noting Staff's concern with the health of one Oak tree located by a retaining wall, and referring to Staff Recommended Condition 7 requiring work to be done under the supervision of an arborist. She also noted it was necessary for the Commission to consider the provisions of Section 10-2.7102(b) fir' Preservation of Ridgelines and Hilltops in considering this application. Commissioner Pahl referred to Staff Recommended Condition 4, noting the implications of this condition as drafted were different than proposed by Staff in the past. Ms. Netto responded that it could be changed. There was no specific intent relative to changing of the condition as stated in the past. Commissioner Pahl referred to the Preliminary Geologic and Geotechnical Review from the Town Geotechnical Consultant, and wished to know if the information being requested was above and beyond what is usually required. Bill Ekern responded that it was not. Commissioner Pahl referred to the Staff Report and Staff's note that the applicant had proposed less than half of the maximum allowed floor area and development area, and wished to know if the intent was that the Commission place greater merit on the application because of this. Ms. Netto noted Staff wished the Commission to be aware that the applicant was not building to the maximums allowed, and that it could be said that this was better than having two houses constructed there. The Public Hearing was opened. John Owen, project manager, noted they had worked with Staff regarding the siting of the proposed development and responded to the Town's requests. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 11, 1991 Page 3 In response to a question from Chairman Noel, Mr. Owen noted they had read and would comply with the Staff Recommended Conditions of Approval. In response to a question from Commissioner Comiso, Mr. Owen clarified that there was an existing right-of-way used by the existing homes on the property. In response to a question from Commissioner Comiso, Bill Ekern noted approximately 500 cubic yards of cut for the basement and 100 cubic yards of cut from the pool, clarifying that about half of the total excavation was associated with these two holes. He noted the Town policy was to export cut material rather than to artificially reconstruct a site. Dot Schreiner, 14301 Saddle Mountain Drive, Pathways Committee Chair, noted the Committee requested construction of a path on top of the bank on Manuella Road. The Public Hearing was closed. MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Ellinger, seconded by Pahl and passed to approve the Site Development permit for a new residence and swimming pool with Staff recommended Conditions 1 - 3 and 5 - 9 and the following E Conditions 4 and 10: 4. Paint color of the structure shall be approved by Staff in conformance with the Town's adopted color board. 10. A Type II -B path shall be constructed along Manuella Road in the existing pathway easement AYES: Chairman Noel and Commissioners Cheng, Comiso, Ellinger, Jones, Pahl NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Stutz 4.3 LANDS OF SHAKIR, 12476 Briones Way: A request for a Site Development permit for an Addition/Remodel Commissioner Comiso stepped down from consideration of this application as a neighboring property owner. Margaret Netto introduced this item noting the proposed addition will not block existing views as the existing residence is located below street level and is mitigated by heavy landscaping on the east side. She noted Staff concern that the second story c appears massive because of the blank walls, recommending architectural treatment to address the blank walls. The Public Hearing was opened. 96 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 11, 1991 Page 4 Brian Peters, project architect, noted concern with the Staff Recommended Conditions, specifically for the front facing wall. He clarified that it is a closet supporting the master bedroom, noting it is a relatively small portion of the entire elevation, and the house is set down from the road. Commissioner Pahl noted he would like to see some type of treatment, architectural facade, not windows. He felt that anything that could be down to alleviate the massing would be beneficial to the homeowner and the Town. Dot Schreiner, representing the Pathways Committee, requested restoration of the existing pathway after construction. The Public Hearing was closed. Commissioner Ellinger noted he was reluctant to have the Commission get into design, but would like to see mitigation. He felt the artistic effort should remain with the architect. Commissioner Jones felt the condition as written was acceptable; if Staff was unreasonable, the applicant could come back to the Planning Commission. The L Commission owed it to Staff to believe Staff would be reasonable. MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Pahl, seconded by Jones and passed to approve the Site Development permit for an addition/remodel with Staff Recommended Conditions 1 - 8 and the following Conditions 9 and 10: 9. The applicant shall mitigate the north facing blank wall and shall submit proposed exterior facing treatment to the Planning Commission prior to submittal of landscape planting plans. 10. Existing pathway shall be repaired prior to Building permit final. AYES: Chairman Noel and Commissioners Cheng, Ellinger, Jones, Pahl NOES: None ABSTAIN: Commissioner Comiso ABSENT: Commissioner Stutz 4.4 LANDS OF MEYER, 25541 Chapin Road: A request for a Site Development permit for a Major Addition Margaret Netto introduced this item noting the addition conforms to the provisions of the Zoning and Site Development Ordinance and is consistent with the existing residence and the surrounding neighborhood. The Public Hearing was opened. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 11, 1991 Page 5 Ralph Saviano, project manager, in response to concerns of Commissioners Pahl and Ellinger, clarified that a pier and grade beam foundation was proposed. He noted the structural aspects, not a part of the plans submitted for site development review, had been forwarded to the Town Geotechnical Consultant, along with swell test data requested. Dot Schreiner, Pathways Chair, requested reconstruction of the pathway on Chapin Road and trimming of the Oleanders along the path. In response to a question from Chairman Noel, Mr. Saviano noted he had read and had no problems with the Staff Recommended Conditions of Approval. The Public Hearing was closed. MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Ettinger, seconded by Cheng and passed to approve the Site Development permit for a major addition with Staff Recommended Conditions 1 - 8, and with the following Condition 9: 9. Existing pathway along Chapin Road shall be repaired prior to Building permit final. AYES: Chairman Noel and Commissioners Cheng, Comiso, Ettinger, Jones, Pahl NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Stutz 4.5 LANDS OF BEN-ARTZI, 27800 Via Feliz: A request for a Site Development permit for a New Residence, Tennis Court, and Swimming Pool Margaret Netto introduced this item, clarifying that four trees were proposed to be removed. She noted that the application received Site Analysis review. The applicant made considerable effort to design a house that fit into the site. The garage and basement are proposed to be cut into the hillside. She noted Staff recommended approval of the Site Development permit with conditions. Chairman Noel disclosed that the Planning Commission had adjourned to a site visit for the property and the Commission, Staff, Committee members, and interested residents had met on-site at 6:00 p.m. that evening. Commissioners Pahl, Comiso, Ettinger, and Chairman Noel also disclosed that they had been to the site with Mr. Owen. The Public Hearing was opened. John Owen, representing the applicants, wished to clarify that the project was the Lands of Ben-Artzi, not the Lands of Owen as indicated on the Staff Report. He noted they had worked closely with Staff, incorporating suggestions regarding the PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 11, 1991 Page 6 home, site, and elevations. They had no problems with the Staff Recommended Conditions of Approval. Mr. Owen noted their interest in following through with plantings for mitigation. He presented a letter of support for the project signed by a number of the residents in the area, and a photographic display showing the surrounding panorama through five views and exhibits showing the relationship to adjoining properties. June Dean, 27677 Lupine Road, noted her house is located below the proposed new residence. She noted the existing home is not currently visible. She felt a two story home, with a Mansard roof, with the tree removal proposed, would have great impact. Yung Kim, 27830 Via Feliz, noted the proposed residence overlooks the whole area and would impact the privacy of the Kim's pool area. He noted they would like to see a single story home to blend with the atmosphere of the area, as the proposed development appears more urban. He submitted a letter of petition for a single story residence on the site. Mr. Kim also noted concern with proposed tree cutting. Mary Belden, 27840 Via Feliz, felt the proposed development would be terribly obtrusive to the area. The Mansard roof would be very noticeable and wouldn't blend into the terrain. She noted opposition to the size and two story nature of the proposed residence, and the cutting of Oaks and other trees and subsequent loss of privacy. Dot Schreiner, Pathways Chair, requested an extra five feet of dedication of the existing pathway as it is a pedestrian/equestrian/bicycle route critical to the Town and serving four or five subdivisions. The Commission discussed alternate pathway routes. Dot Schreiner, 14301 Saddle Mountain Road, noted the proposed development will be very visible from the Saddle Mountain Road area. Mrs. Belden referred to Article Seven of the Site Development Ordinance, noting the proposed roof is very steep and certainly isn't low profile. John Owen clarified their intentions to plant additional trees to screen the neighbors from the new residence and to screen the new residence from the neighbors. He presented a photograph showing the relative heights of residences on Avila Court and the proposed residence. He also noted that there is an existing vacant lot between this property and the Kim's property, which will likely be a single story dwelling because of the CC&R's for the site, that will cut out the Kim's view of the t. subject residence completely. He noted they had no problem with the dedication of five feet of easement. Is PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 11, 1991 Page 7 The Public Hearing was closed. Commissioner Ettinger noted the site was sensitive, and became more sensitive with the removal of trees. He felt a single story home would be more appropriate for the site, noting he liked the design of the residence and felt the architectural elements could remain with a single story design. Commissioner Pahl noted concern that the proposed residence gave the appearance of being three stories, and felt it was not appropriate for this particular site. He noted that whether the site is considered to be a hilltop or a ridgeline, a two story house would have to be designed with great sensitivity. Commissioner Comiso also felt the residence gave the appearance of three stories. She noted she would like to see a landscaping photomontage for the proposed development. Commissioner Jones noted that the step -on -contour ordinance nearly required houses to appear to be three stories. He noted concern with the obtrusiveness of the proposed residence, largely the result of the steepness of the roof. He noted he would be more inclined to approve the application if the roofline was flatter. Chairman Noel felt the proposed project was not up to the caliber of other projects recently submitted by the Owen Companies. MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Comiso, seconded by Pahl and passed to deny without prejudice the Site Development permit for a new residence, tennis court, and swimming pool. AYES: Chairman Noel and Commissioners Cheng, Comiso, Ettinger, Jones, Pahl NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Stutz 4.6 LANDS OF PABOOJIAN, 27591 Purissima Road: A request for a Site Development permit for a Driveway and Bridge Bill Ekern introduced this item noting the bridge is proposed in an existing ingress/egress easement. There is an existing bridge through another easement on the property. The applicant requested clarification of the Staff Report as there are issues Staff did not specifically address with the applicant. First, Staff discusses construction of a II -B pathway along Purissima Road. A pathway currently exists and the standard concern is that the pathway should be replaced if a bridge is built. The applicant was also concerned that on the site visits, Staff had not discussed fb, proposed removal of shrubbery between the subject property and the Swanson property. Mr. Ekern clarified that the extent that the bridge and driveway propose to warp across the property line became clear after further consideration and through PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 11, 1991 Page 8 discussion with the Swansons. Finally, there was some concern over Staff's concern with the negative impact of fill in the area of existing Oak trees. The applicant did retain an arborist whose recommendations have been incorporated. Some of the wing walls have been redesigned. One Staff concern is fill over the roots of Oak trees and measures that can be taken to better assure their survival. Staff recommended construction of a free span bridge with no fill at all, and additional information on sight distances to be provided by the applicant's engineer. Commissioner Pahl noted that with all of the documents and a lengthy Staff Report, two things lacking were a rational reason for moving the bridge, and information on how it relates to the existing lots on the other side of Deer Creek and potential future development. He noted the importance of maintaining the rural character, and not having a bridge for every lot on Deer Creek. In response to a question from Commissioner Jones, Mr. Ekern noted that the ten foot turning radius from the proposed driveway into the Swanson's existing driveway functions, but it is not standard design and doesn't function with the way the two roads adjoin, with the existing structures on the property line, or for emergency vehicles. The Public Hearing was opened. Hansel Bauman, agent, noted the owner is correctly identified as Lindy Properties. He distributed a letter in response to the Staff Report. Mr. Bauman noted the property was purchased with the intent of building a single family residence. He noted the existing bridge is 90 years old and of questionable structural integrity. Mr. Bauman noted bridge repair required Santa Clara Valley Water District approval and Los Altos Fire Department review as well, and there was concern that it would not be possible to use the bridge while repairing it. Consequently, they propose to continue to use the existing bridge while a new bridge is constructed. He presented a preliminary design concept, and outlined the progression toward the current proposal, including meeting with Staff and concerns with limiting construction. Commissioner Comiso wished to know if the applicant had any drawings showing existing property lines as it was difficult to consider the application without information on where this property ends and where neighboring properties are in relation to the existing bridge and roads and what is proposed. The Commission took a brief break at 9:45 to read the letter from the applicant and to allow Mr. Bauman to get property line information. Warren Whaley, project engineer, clarified that his letter of July 9th, 1991 addressed a proposed bridge location not submitted for the Town's consideration. He noted that information on sight distance for the proposed accessway is underway in the field. He did note that there is a blind curve approximately 270 feet from the currently kar PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 11, 1991 Page 9 proposed bridge location. He referred to the ten foot turning radius for the Swanson's driveway, clarifying that the proposed design is a preliminary design only, not to determine the turning radius which they had sketched for 25 feet, only to get direction from the Commission. Mary Compton, 27855 Via Ventana, representing the Environmental Design Committee, noted they had serious reservations with the proposed bridge. She noted that the subject area is a riparian habitat, typically placed in a conservation easement. She questioned whether the unsafeness of the existing bridge is reason to move the bridge and whether this was the only way the applicant could make full use of the property. Richard Huntington, project arborist, noted there was not a complete design for the proposed road, and there was discussion of how much fill and the potential impacts generally. He noted that in his experience, Oak trees survive construction well. He did note that root cutting does more damage to the trees than fill. The impacts of fill can be mitigated through aeration and the extent of retaining walls. Mr. Huntington noted that of concern to the applicant was how close the proposed road could come to the trunks of the Oaks; they propose to not come within 10 feet of the large Oaks. Irrigation and changes in drainage have negative impact on Oak trees so the system f, is designed to slope away from the trees. The design of the wing walls have been changed so the cut is angled toward the tree and does not go right across the roots. Paul Swanson, 25575 Purissima Road, felt the proposed location of the bridge was unsafe. He noted he could not understand why the bridge was being relocated into a corner. He noted he was not against work being undertaken on the existing bridge and understood that there will be associated inconveniences. He noted there were additional existing trees that would be impacted that weren't shown on the plans. In response to a question from Commissioner Pahl, Mr. Swanson noted there was a 13 acre parcel that if subdivided would have to access through the Lindy property. Dennis Paboojian, applicant, noted frustration with the situation. He noted concern that if the proposed bridge is denied, and he comes back with a bridge that the SCVWD would approve, that meets current Town codes, the Commission wouldn't like it any better. He felt a wider bridge would be required for a building permit for a new residence, and there would be far greater impact to the existing trees. The Town had told him the structural integrity of the existing bridge would have to be ensured, which would be a major investment. He explained they had considered a number of alternatives, but after working with the Town and other agencies, considered the current proposal the most sound, and it impacts one Oak tree. He expressed concern that if the Town requires improvements to the existing bridge, the SCVWD will require it to be three to four feet higher than the existing bridge PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 11, 1991 Page 10 Bill Ekern noted that a reasonable width for a bridge would be fourteen feet. Minimum driveway width for two lots is twelve feet and in order to provide some buffer, as there is no place to pull off on a bridge, some extra footage was advisable. So he did inform Mr. Bauman fourteen feet was a minimum width. Mr. Paboojian noted a third issue was access, and he understood the Swansons wished to be left alone. The only feasible way to avoid disturbing the Swansons would be to build a temporary structure. Such a structure would do further damage to the environment and provide access for public service vehicles. Mr. Paboojian noted he was trying to understand what the Planning Commission is going to require for a building permit for a new residence. Commissioner Pahl responded that as that application is not yet in front of the Planning Commission, he could not say what he is going to require. However, of significant concern is how many parcels the bridge will serve. He noted he had heard that the bridge has served the property for 92 years and fire vehicles have used it. Mr. Paboojian noted the building permit would be for a single family residence, and two residences will be served by the bridge. Chairman Noel referred to the Francemont Subdivision, noting that applicant had been required to come in with a complete application, including the bridge and the home sites for the subdivision. He noted Staff's recommendation against approving the application in a piecemeal fashion. Mr. Swanson noted he would like more effort given to utilization of the existing bridge location. In response to a question from Chairman Noel, Mr. Swanson confirmed traffic problems with the existing bridge, noting it is placed as dead center as possible in terms of sight distance. He noted it is extremely dangerous when cars come around the bend on Purissima Road. Bill Ekern clarified that if the existing bridge is repaired, the SCVWD would review the repair of the bridge and they are a permitting agency. If they consider it to impede the flow of a 100 -Year Flood, they would likely require the bridge to conform to the 100 year flood level. SCVWD is responsible for ensuring against flooding and ensuring there isn't property damage as a result of flooding. He felt the issues could be worked out, for example, if the property owner assumes all liability. Government agencies try to work together in cooperative agreements. 460 Mr. Bauman noted the Fire Department also had concerns about width. N PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 11, 1991 Page 11 Commissioner Pahl clarified that the Fire Department is not a permitting agency, but the Town does consider their requirements. Mr. Ekern clarified that if access to the house is precluded, the Fire Department will not serve the property and would recommend installation of fire sprinklers. In response to a question from Commissioner Comiso, Mr. Swanson noted that the Los Altos Fire Department had been out to the house about three years ago. Mike Walsh, for the Swansons, noted the Swanson's willingness to not use the bridge while repairs were underway. He noted the existing bridge is sunk down and questioned whether raising the level would create any problems of obtrusiveness. Mr. Walsh noted the Swanson's interest in working with the applicant, and noted that they had no problem with not using the bridge 30 or 60 days, whatever it takes to fix the existing bridge. He noted it appeared a great deal of practical design work had been done without asking the question of whether to fix the existing bridge. Commissioner Ellinger noted there was a great deal of potentially developable property across Deer Creek and asked whether the applicant intended to set up the property so it could not be further subdivided. Mr. Paboojian responded that he did not. The Public Hearing was closed. Commissioner Comiso noted the Planning Commission as well as the City Council is charged with the health and safety of the residents of Los Altos Hills. She noted she had been to the subject property three times and felt that moving the bridge to the new location presented safety problems for the applicant, the Town, neighboring property owners, and residents. Commissioner Jones felt the proposed bridge location seemed safer than the existing bridge. It appeared the sight distance wasn't decreasing and moving the bridge higher made visibility even better. He felt the safety concerns of the bridge should be addressed by a professional traffic engineer. Commissioner Comiso agreed that a detailed traffic report would be invaluable. Commissioner Ellinger noted a great deal of work had gone into the project. He felt a proposal showing the siting of the home to be built, and the bridge, buildings, and driveway and how they work together should be submitted for the Town's consideration. Commissioner Pahl noted his agreement with Commissioner Ellinger. He felt that necessary improvements increased exponentially the more houses there are to use the bridge. He noted he would like to see a site development plan, and work with the existing bridge. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 11, 1991 Page 12 Commissioner Comiso noted the Planning Commission is well known for working with applicants and neighbors. She felt the issues could be worked out with presentation of a comprehensive plan for development. Chairman Noel noted precedent had been set with the Francemont subdivision bridge, requiring a comprehensive plan for development. He felt the same should be asked for the subject property. He noted it would have been an excellent project for Site Analysis. MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Pahl, seconded by Comiso and passed to deny without prejudice the Site Development permit for a driveway and bridge. AYES: Chairman Noel and Commissioners Cheng, Comiso, Ellinger, Jones, Pahl NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Stutz A number of commissioners suggested the project come in for Site Analysis review. 4.7 LANDS OF FONG, 25889 Fremont Road: A request for a Site Development permit for a New Residence, Tennis Court, and Swimming Pool The public hearing was canceled 4. NEW BUSINESS Commissioner Pahl referred to the Subdivision Committee meeting recently scheduled for 3:00 p.m. and noted that the original intent was that site development and subdivision go the to 6:00 p.m. on Wednesdays. Now the Site Development has gone to the Planning Commission at 7:30 p.m. and possibly the Subdivision meetings should go to the Commission as well. Bill Ekern noted the point of the subdivision committee meeting is to take a non - quorum section of the Planning Commission and Staff. It is a non-technical session to work with the committees and the neighbors of the property to talk with the applicant about issues they will need to be prepared to address. Commissioner Pahl suggested placing the subdivision committee meetings at 6:00 p.m. so all the Commissioners have the opportunity to attend. Bill Ekern noted concern that this constitutes acting on a tentative map. The purpose of the Subdivision Committee is to provide a recommendation to the Planning Commission. If the Planning Commission meets as a body of the whole, it �r will be providing a recommendation to itself. He also noted the Planning Commission had seen the subdivision at Site Analysis review. M PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 11, 1991 Page 13 The Commission discussed participation of planning commissioners in, and scheduling of, Subdivision Committee meetings. Chairman Noel suggested the Commission consider this issue and asked that it be agendized under Old Business for the next Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Jones suggested that the recommendations of the Pathways Committee be added to the packet. Bill Ekern clarified that Staff has asked the committees to submit conditions in writing to be incorporated into the Staff Report. 5. OLD BUSINESS Commissioner Ellinger wished the Commission to be aware of the County -wide table top emergency preparedness exercise the Town would be participating in on September 26th, 1991, beginning at 9:00 a.m. The emergency situation is based on an earthquake of magnitude 7.0. Bill Ekern noted he had spoken with Sun Country Cable company to remind them of the Commission's interest in the issue of the antenna at the riding ring. Sun Country Cable is looking at provisions for lowering a portion of the antenna. 6. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF JULY 24TH, 1991 MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Noel, seconded by Comiso, and passed by consensus, with Commissioner Ellinger abstaining, to approve the minutes of July 24th, 1991. 7. REPORT FROM THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 4TH, 1991 Chairman Noel reported the Lands of Circle subdivision was denied, the appeal of the Planning Commission approval of the Lands of Fong was approved with some changes. Lands of Shockley was approved. And, Council directed the Commission to address the Site Development Policy Statement. 8. REPORT FROM THE SITE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETINGS OF AUGUST 6TH AND 27TH, AND SEPTEMBER 3RD AND 10TH, 1991 August 6th, 1991: Bill Ekern reported two items were reviewed and approved: Chao - Landscape Plantings. May - Landscape Plantings. Lighting was proposed. Commissioner Comiso noted she would like to see lighting agendized for a future Planning Commission meeting. Bill Ekern suggested it might be better addressed as a work item as it gets into a range of issues. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 11, 1991 Page 14 August 27th, 1991: Bettencourt - Landscape plantings. Requirements included tree planting, pathway reconstruction, and installation of erosion protection. September 3rd, 1991: Quattrone - Landscape plantings. Plantings were required to mitigate the impact of the cabana. Additional trees were required along the east side of the property. Commissioner Comiso referred to the Site Development meeting of September 3rd, and noted the Town has the right to require mitigation but property owners should be given a choice of trees. September 10, 1991: Bill Ekern reported two items were reviewed and approved: Owen - Landscaping. Impact of construction on Oaks was of concern and an arborist's report was required. Slope stabilization was required. Finn - Landscaping. :9�\�7L�If�[iifi The meeting was adjourned by consensus at 11:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Laura Johnson Planning Secretary