Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/25/1991APPROVED PLANNING COMMISSION it MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS 26379 FREMONT ROAD LOS ALTOS HILLS, CALIFORNIA WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25TH, 1991 cc: Cassettes #I5-91 1. ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chairman Noel called the Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Town Hall. Present: Chairman Noel and Commissioners Cheng, Comiso, Ellinger, Jones, Pahl Absent: Commissioner Stutz Staff: Bill Ekern, Director of Public Works; Jeff Peterson, City Engineer; Margaret Netto, Planning Consultant; Laura Johnson, Planning Secretary kW Commissioner Ellinger arrived at 7:40 p.m. The City Engineer arrived at 9:00 p.m. 2. APPOINTMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS 2.1 Report from Sun Country Cable PASSED BY CONSENSUS: This item was continued by consensus to the end of the Planning Commission meeting as a representative of Sun Country Cable was not present. 3. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR There were no presentations from the floor. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.1 LANDS OF TAKAMOTO, 13680 Robleda Road: A request for a Site Development permit for a New Residence. Margaret Netto introduced this item, noting the existing house, garage, and barn are proposed to be demolished. She noted the applicant worked with Staff to design a house that was sensitive to the natural landscape. The Public Hearing was opened. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 25th, 1991 Page 2 Leigh Sata, project architect, presented a model of the proposed new residence. He noted the design of the residence includes many windows, trellis elements, and a pitched roof. The applicant proposes to keep landscaping simple, in character with the existing fruit trees and redwood trees. They propose to add a landscape buffer along Robleda Court. In response to a question from Commissioner Pahl, Mr. Sata noted the Staff Recommended Conditions of Approval were acceptable. David Takamoto, applicant, referred to Condition #10, noting that in terms of construction a pathway was acceptable, but wished to know the location. Bill Ekern clarified that the path would be in the road right-of-way. Commissioner Jones wished to know if the applicant had considered access off Robleda Court instead of Robleda Road. Mr. Sata noted access off Robleda Court had been a consideration, but they elected to continue the access off Robleda Road as there was a nice sense of arrival with the longer driveway, in keeping with living in a rural community. The Public Hearing was closed. Commissioner Jones noted it appeared all drainage was directed to the top of the septic leachfield, and suggested requiring the drainage to be routed further down the property. Bill Ekern clarified that the Santa Clara County Health Department had approved the project with the proposed drainage as a design consideration. The Town's concern is that water is not concentrated. Location may vary according to actual conditions in the field so the Town rarely constrains someone to an exact location. MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Pahl, seconded by Ellinger and passed to approve the Site Development permit for a new residence with Staff Recommended Conditions 1, 3, 5 - 10 and with the following conditions 2 and 4: 2. The site drainage must be designed to meet the goal of reducing the rate of run off associated with the proposed development and shall be to the satisfaction of the Santa Clara County Health Department and Town Staff. 4. Color of the structure is to be approved by Staff in conformance with the Town's adopted color board. AYES: Chairman Noel and Commissioners Cheng, Comiso, Ellinger, Jones, Pahl NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Stutz 4.2 LANDS OF SCOTT, 27860 Black Mountain Road: A request for a Site Development permit for a New Residence, Swimming Pool, and Pool House. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 25th, 1991 Page 3 Margaret Netto introduced this item, noting Staff's concern with one Oak tree and recommendation that a certified arborist supervise and report on any work done within the dripline of the Oak. She noted the project underwent Site Analysis review prior to submittal and Staff felt the design of the residence was sensitive to the site and met the Town's goals for design. A number of design treatments help blend the house into the landscape, including horizontal shaped windows, use of overhanging eaves, the low roof line, and preservation of Oak trees. Commissioner Jones referred to Staff Recommended Condition #4, noting it included approval of materials. Margaret Netto clarified it is a recommendation and can be changed. Bill Ekern noted the Site Development Ordinance does address the concept of materials as mitigation. The Public Hearing was opened. Bob Stoecker, project architect, clarified that the existing guest house will be removed. He noted they would be happy to supply sample boards but had not yet chosen the stone. He clarified they were not using stucco, but redwood and fieldstone, with a shake roof. And, Mr. Stoecker clarified that all of the proposed cut is from the basement, with 400 cubic yards of fill remaining on site for berming against the house. He also noted they supported the Staff Recommended Conditions of Approval. In response to a question from Commissioner Pahl regarding the seats in the proposed theater, Mr. Stoecker noted that even though they did not want to be constrained to a specific number of seats, they would agree to no more than nine permanent seats. Commissioner Jones noted concern that the proposed skylights along the ridge would light up the sky. Mr. Stoecker referenced the specifications and clarified that the skylights were to be constructed of non -reflective fiberglass and consisted of a sandwich panel with spun glass fibres inside of it, it cannot be seen through, has no reflective qualities, and allows only 20% of light in. It is a very translucent material. In response to a question from Commissioner Pahl regarding Site Analysis review, Mr. Stoecker noted Staff acknowledged the architectural features of the house as the type of design elements the Town wants to see. He clarified that Site Analysis had become a requirement at the time they were coming in to submit a final design. Dot Schreiner, 14301 Saddle Mountain Drive, Pathways Committee Chair wished the applicant to be aware of the pathway easement along Black Mountain Road. Mr. Scott, applicant, wished to know whether they could clean up bushes in the pathway easement. The Commission encouraged him to do so. The Public Hearing was closed. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 25th, 1991 Page 4 Commissioner Pahl noted the property had been through Site Analysis review and wished to know what was discussed regarding height. Bill Ekern responded that the site is very flat and heavily vegetated. The existing conditions made it a very mitigated site. The style, the extreme horizontality and materials, integrate it onto the site. Even at 27 feet, the wrong design would create a vertical appearance on the site. He clarified, in response to a question from Commissioner Pahl, that if the project had come in as a two story residence 27 feet in height, Staff would have recommended approval. In response to a question from Commissioner Jones, Bill Ekern noted that the characteristics of the material provided mitigation of interior light. He added that Staff's position was that muted white light was better than the purple that other treatments have generated. In response to Commissioner Comiso, Mr. Stoecker compared the proposed skylight to a similarly sized skylight they had done on a home in Portola Valley. The other skylight is on a residence on a flat site and there have been no objections. The subject property is far more sheltered by existing vegetation and views would be from much further away. He noted that when a house is lit at night, there will be far more impact from light from windows than from this skylight. In response to a question from Commissioner Ellinger, Mr. Stoecker noted baffling the skylight would be very difficult. He noted trees exist on three sides of the house, the house is setback from the road so it is not visible in the hills, except possibly from very far away. In regard to Condition #4, Bill Ekern clarified that Staff's recommendation of approval was predicated on exterior materials discussed by the project architect. The Planning Commission discussed addressing changes to exterior materials, and provisions for potential impacts from the skylight. Mr. Stoecker noted they were so confident the exterior materials would be redwood and fieldstone, they were willing to have the Staff Recommended Condition remain as written. Commissioner Ellinger noted the applicant appeared to have done a tremendous amount of design work. He felt the project was notable as an example of, "We caught them doing it right" MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Ellinger, seconded by Comiso and passed to approve the Site Development permit for a new residence, pool house, ` and swimming pool with Staff Recommended Conditions 1, 2, 5 - 8, and with the following conditions 3, 4, 9, and 10: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 25th, 1991 Page 5 3. Prior to final inspection and release of occupancy permits a landscape planting plan must be submitted to and approved by the Planning Commission. Drought tolerant and native plantings are recommended. Landscape planting plan will pay particular attention to the effect, if any, of the skylights. 4. Color and materials of the structure are to be approved by Staff in conformance with the Town's adopted color board. 9. There shall be no more than nine permanent seats in the 'theater', as shown in plans received August 22, 1991. 10. Pathway easement along Black Mountain Road shall be kept clear of debris. AYES: Chairman Noel and Commissioners Cheng, Comiso, Ellinger, Jones, Pahl NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Stutz 4.3 LANDS OF TUTTLE, 13660 Golden Hill Court: A request for a Variance to the maximum development area limitation of the Zoning Code and a Site Development permit for a Swimming Pool. Margaret Netto introduced this item, outlining the quantitative analysis, and noted Staff could not make the findings necessary for a variance. The subject property's size, configuration, and topography do not impose limitations that substantiate approval of the variance requested. The Public Hearing was opened. Jack Tuttle, applicant, noted they were told at the time the house was approved that a pool would have to be modest; they did not pursue pool installation at that time as they had small children. They wished to put in a pool based on requirements that were in effect when they built the home. Golden Hill Court is a very small street with five homes, three of which have swimming pools. Mr. Tuttle referred to a letter of support from the neighboring property owners. Margaret Netto clarified that under the previous requirements, the Tuttles would have been entitled to a swimming pool. Bill Ekern noted that prior to 1987, properties with a lot unit factor less than 1.0 were given an artificial LUF of 1.0, allowing 7,000 square feet of development area. The building coverage of 3,080 square feet was exactly what was allowed at the time. Under 1985 regulations, there were about 1600 square feet of development area remaining. Commissioner Pahl asked the Tuttles what made the property unusual compared to other properties in the Town, noting he had difficulty making findings for the variance. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 25th, 1991 Page 6 Mr. Tuttle noted they were asking for nothing special in terms of the regulations in effect in 1985. They wish to construct a pool as it is something important to them, without being extravagant. He did note there is very little area that can be developed, as most of the property is sloped. A pool would provide outdoor living area. Dot Schreiner, resident, noted many people would like to go back to 1985 regulations. A number of properties are faced with a similar situation and she felt the Planning Commission's decision would set a precedent. The Public Hearing was closed. Commissioner Cheng noted she sympathized with the Tuttles, and felt the proposed pool would not hurt anyone, but noted the Commission had to go by the Town ordinances. Commissioner Comiso noted the findings for a variance were not just to satisfy the Town, but the States requires finding that will stand up in court. She noted she could not find the property unusual enough to grant the variance request. Commissioner Ellinger commented it should be noted that findings could not be made at this time in conformance with the Town ordinances, but that construction of a pool would not create havoc with the neighborhood. MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Cheng, seconded by Jones and passed to deny the variance to the maximum development area limitation of the Zoning Code. AYES: Chairman Noel and Commissioners Cheng, Comiso, Ellinger, Jones, Pahl NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Stutz 4.4 LANDS OF DEL INVESTMENTS COMPANY, 24970 O'Keefe Lane: An appeal of the Site Development Committee denial of a request for a Site Development permit for a Tennis Court. This item was continued at the applicant's request to a Planning Commission meeting of November, 1991. 2.1 Report from Sun Country Cable Chairman Noel requested, and the Commission agreed by consensus, to have the report from Sun Country Cable. Brett Fontes, Sun Country Cable, apologized for arriving late. He noted they would prefer not to lower the cross arm of the antenna at the headend site as the signal PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 25th, 1991 Page 7 level decreased 30 to 40 percent and, more importantly, because of concern that it will be more susceptible to any interfering signals. Commissioner Comiso expressed concern that a subcommittee had been formed to discuss issues of and options for addressing the tower as the Commission felt the antenna in place was not what was approved by the Commission, however they had never heard from Sun Country Cable. She was displeased that the subcommittee was not given the opportunity to sit down and talk about alternatives, as discussed with Mr. Fontes at the Planning Commission meeting of April 27, 1991. Commissioner Ellinger noted the subcommittee was to discuss a range of design options. He did not recall any suggestion that there be a signal survey, though this was valuable. The subcommittee was to work through what made the configuration originally approved unworkable and examine what will work. Commissioner Jones noted that if given the opportunity, he would vote to revoke the use permit for Sun Country Cable because the tower at the headend site has substantially more visual impact than that approved by the Commission. Commissioner Pahl noted he understood the tower was modified with Staff k approval. Lowering the cross arm was not suggested the last time the Commission met with Sun Country; Commissioners Comiso and Ellinger were appointed to the subcommittee to discuss various alternatives to be worked out. He expressed concern that Sun Country was only trying to placate the Commission, also noting he would recommend revocation of the use permit to the City Council. Commissioner Ellinger noted the City Council at their meeting of September 18, 1991, requested the Planning Commission Chair notify Council of the nature of the Commission's discussion with Sun Country Cable. The issue of emergency cable access was also under consideration, and the City Manager was directed to provide a status report on cable television issues. Commissioner Ellinger noted he felt the subcommittee was needed, and the issue concerned more than the Planning Commission at this stage. The Commission directed Mr. Fontes to contact the Director of Public Works to set up a subcommittee meeting to include a staff representative and requested the issue be agendized for the Planning Commission meeting of October 23rd under Old Business. 4.5 LANDS OF MERRILL, 25355 La Loma Drive, 185 -91 -TM, APN 336-32-009: A request for adoption of a Negative Environmental Declaration, a Conditional Exception, and approval of a Tentative Map for a two -lot subdivision. Bill Ekern introduced this item, noting the subject property consists of eight acres of land currently in the county. There is an existing residence and barn studio. Staff PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 25th, 1991 Page 8 recommended approval of a mitigated negative declaration and of the tentative map with mitigations included in the conditions of approval. Mr. Ekern noted a conditional exception was required to the 160 foot building circle requirement. PASSED BY CONSENSUS: The Planning Commission agreed by consensus to separate discussion of the negative declaration and the tentative map, with the understanding these issues would be considered as conjunctive actions. Bill Ekern noted the property received Site Analysis review by the Planning Commission in addition to the Subdivision Committee meeting which three commissioners attended. Commissioner Comiso requested clarification from the City Engineer regarding the branch of Hale Creek on the property. Jeff Peterson clarified that to conform with the Town ordinances, the drainage pipes were requested to be removed and the natural drainage pattern reestablished. He noted the pipes were put in when the property was in Santa Clara County. Bill Ekern noted the pipes had been in for about a year. Commissioner Ellinger wished to know why the pipes would be installed and removed one year later. Bill Ekern clarified that culverts were placed into the creek to allow driveway access to the main residence. The issue of restoration of the riparian habitat was not addressed by the County. The Town Engineer's position is consistent with the goals of the General Plan, which is use of natural rather than man-made drainage courses. He noted this was not a recommended condition of the subdivision, but a consideration. The Public Hearing for the negative declaration was opened Jerry Clements, project engineer, referred to the Staff Recommended Conditions of Approval. He requested deletion of Condition 1, as they would like to retain the leachfield. It was suggested by Santa Clara County that a leachfield was a good solution. Their arborist indicated there would be almost no damage to the Oak trees. He questioned whether the lift station was advisable as he understood from the City of San Carlos that problems could arise at the sewage treatment plant if sewage did not get to the plant within 24 hours. Bill Ekern clarified this problem had not been reported with other lift stations. He noted that San Carlos has an industrial area. He also noted a lift station was just approved for a private residence, in Los Altos, that pumps approximately 200 feet. Jean Struthers, 13690 Robleda Road, Representative - Environmental Design Committee, noted it was the Committee's opinion that the configuration of the subdivision would cause loss of a great deal of vegetation. They suggested a different lot configuration that would preserve the Oak hillside, as the only building site with the current configuration is where the majority of the trees are located. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 25th, 1991 Page 9 Also, a natural riparian situation for the creek was preferable to culverting except where culverting is necessary for a driveway. Jean Struthers, resident, noted there was a future possible sewer from the Dawson subdivision through the Quarry. The potential problem of the lift station could be a temporary solution until the main come through the Quarry. Commissioner Ellinger noted the Environmental Checklist indicated the proposal could result in a decrease in the plant species, and wished to know what unique, rare, or endangered species there were on the subject property. Ms. Struthers clarified the Committee was not involved in producing the Environmental Checklist, but noted there were Chapparal Oaks on the site. She noted oak woodlands are an endangered habitat. Commissioner Ettinger suggested perhaps 4.a. would be correctly checked yes Ms. Struthers and the Commission discussed alternate lot configurations. Kieth Merrill, applicant, noted they wished to continue to live on parcel B. He noted Hale Creek is a dry creek. There was a major study on drainage through the Quarry to the Bay and no significant wildlife habitats were identified on the property. Culverts were put in under a permit from the Department of Fish and Game. The only evidence of any creek is a streambed made because of requirements, any erosion is from the Purissima Hills Water District facility. He clarified that part of the piping was put in at the request of the Water District, and part because the area was so unsightly. The Public Hearing for the negative declaration was closed. Commissioner Ellinger noted he did not see how the impacts could be mitigated, particularly impact to the trees. He thought it was a wonderful seven acre site and shouldn't be subdivided. He felt a septic leachfield could not be put in without impacting the Oak trees. Commissioner Comiso noted concern with the size of house the current calculations would allow on the new building site, but felt the issue could be addressed through restrictions. She noted she had walked the site four times and felt that with a creative architect, an appropriate house could be developed on the site. Commissioner Ellinger noted that regarding 21.a. of the Environmental Checklist, kw he was compelled to answer 'yes'. MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Comiso, seconded by Noel and passed to recommend acceptance of a mitigated negative declaration, with mitigations to be included in the Conditions of Approval. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 25th, 1991 Page 10 AYES:Chairman Noel and Commissioners Cheng, Comiso, Jones, Pahl NOES: Commissioner Ettinger ABSENT: Commissioner Stutz Chairman Noel left the meeting at 10:05 p.m. The Public Hearing for the tentative map was opened. Mr. Merrill referred to Staff Recommended Condition 2, noting he had corrals planned on the upper North side of the property. He noted that optimally he would like to keep conservation easement limited to slopes in excess of 30%. He wished to know whether poison oak could be removed from the conservation easement. Bill Ekern noted Town Ordinance requires that treatment of conservation easements is recommended by the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council. Mr. Ekern requested clarification in the conditions if the Commission recommended approval of poison oak removal. Mr. Merrill referred to Condition 3, noting they were giving one path, and had identified a second path at the Pathways Committee's request. He did note objection ( to the responsibility of getting permission from Mr. Vidovich. He suggested coming up with a solution that leaves things in the spirit of good faith until it is clear whether the adjacent area will belong to the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District. Mr. Merrill referred to Condition 6 noting he and the Director of Public Works agreed to strike 'severely'. Regarding Condition 7, the Director of Public Works thought it reasonable to impose an eight inch standard minimum diameter for trees, though he would prefer small saplings not be cut. And regarding Condition #9, Mr. Merrill suggested, and noted the Director of Public Works had agreed, to evaluation after two years to verify whether monitoring should continue. A discussion ensued between the Commission and Mr. Merrill regarding provisions for sanitary sewer. Mr. Ekern explained the Town's reimbursement policy for sewer installation beyond what is necessary for subdivision improvements. In response to a question from Commissioner Ellinger, Mr. Merrill noted he felt confident a new residence could be built on the new parcel with removal of very few trees. Certain portions of the house will fall under the dripline of existing trees. He noted they had developed a preliminary design. He felt the damage assessment of the Environmental Design and Protection Committee was incorrect, noting he was cognizant of and sensitive to the trees on the site. Commissioner Pahl noted a 4 - 5,000 square foot house was not likely. He felt that L 'severely' might not be an appropriate term for a deed, but that the lot is severely constrained. Commissioner Pahl asked Mr. Merrill's position on connection to sewer. Mr. Merrill noted that if sanitary sewer is the best course of action, he is interested. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 25th, 1991 Page 11 He felt that in some ways it was preferable, though he was confident in their arborist, as it would alleviate the risk of impacting the Oak trees. He would like to have the option left open. He noted they have reconfigured the lot to accommodate the leachfield out of the area of 30% slope. Commissioner Jones suggested that if sewer become available through the Quarry, that may be preferable to a pump station. Mr. Merrill noted concern this would entail construction of 1000 feet of sewer. He noted it may be the preferable option, but requested provisions in the Conditions in case it was not possible from an engineering standpoint. Commissioner Pahl noted they could condition development on parcel A to require connection to sewer; however, it may be necessary to go across parcel B to connect parcel A to sewer. Dot Schreiner, Chair - Pathways Committee, referred to page 7 of the Staff Report. Bill Ekern clarified that there was an irrevocable offer of dedication of the street which will roll over to the Town from the County, though La Loma Drive is a private road. The Town could accept an offer of dedication for pathway easement purposes. Dot Schreiner, Mr. Merrill, and the Planning Commission discussed provisions for pathways and access to the open space. The Public Hearing for the tentative map was closed MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Comiso, seconded by Cheng and passed to recommend approval of a conditional exception for less than a 160 foot building circle. AYES: Commissioners Cheng, Comiso, Jones, Pahl NOES: Commissioner Ellinger ABSENT: Chairman Noel and Commissioner Stutz Bill Ekern clarified that the subdivision ordinance requires dedication of utilities easements and undergrounding of utilities. He noted Staff did not recommend acceptance of the storm drainage easement that presently exists, or of the dedication of La Loma Drive until it is improved, though the Commission may want to consider the easement for pathway purposes. The Commission discussed considering a general policy for poison oak removal, or ( provisions for the subject property only. Bill Ekern noted concern with removal of `, vegetation, including poison oak, destabilizing a slope. kw PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 25th, 1991 Page 12 Commissioner Pahl suggested that removal of a reasonable amount of poison oak was appropriate. Commissioner Ellinger suggested that on a very steep slope, removal of poison oak would not be necessary as such an area would not be used. MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Comiso, seconded by Cheng and passed to recommend approval of the Tentative Map with Staff Recommended Conditions 1, 4, 5, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and the following conditions 2, 3, 6, 7, 8,10,12,20: 2. The applicant shall dedicate to the Town as Conservation Easement that portion of the Tentative Map shown as shaded. No structures or grading, including grading for installation of storm drainage or sanitary sewage disposal, shall be allowed within these easements. No vegetation removal is allowed without permission from the Planning Commission, Town of Los Altos Hills. The Owner's Certificate shall clearly state these conditions and the intent of the easement is preservation and protection of steep slopes and oak woodlands. Removal by hand of a reasonable amount of poison oak, for the safety and recreational use of the property, is approved. 3. A general pathway easement shall be maintained for the benefit of the Town of Los Altos Hills to the satisfaction of Staff, after consulting with the Pathways Committee, that provides access to the open space lands to the south. 6. A note shall placed in the Owner's Certificate that Parcel A is constrained and a Conditional Development Permit shall be required for development. The limits of development shall be determined by the Planning Commission. No living Oak trees greater than 8 inches in diameter, measured at four feet high, shall be removed without written permission from the Town. All Oak trees within any construction zone must be fenced at the dripline prior to beginning construction. All work done within the dripline of any Oak must be done under the supervision of a certified arborist approved by the Town who will provide a report of the work done and any required remediation to the Town. Such recommendations shall become conditions of environmental mitigation for the development of these lots. 8. A graded native pathway shall be constructed at the direction of Staff within the easement described in Condition 3, above. The construction of this pathway shall occur prior to recordation of the Final Map, or be bonded against, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 10. The existing drainage system installed in Hale Creek, including the earth dike, kar parallel culverts, and rip rapped ditch, shall be inspected no later than October 15, of each year, within 24 hours of the first storm of the rainy season (by definition this season will begin October 15 and end April 15 the following year), and no later than April 15 of each year for a period of 24 months after N PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 25th, 1991 Page 13 recordation. this inspection shall be made by a registered civil engineer who will provide the Town a written report summarizing the condition of the drainage facilities. Any remedial action recommended in this report must be done by the owner(s) within fifteen calendar days of notice by the Town. Notice shall be served by registered mail. If the required work has not commenced within that time, the Town may initiate the work at its discretion and cause the property owners to bear the costs, plus appropriate administrative charges as may be determined by the City Council. 12. To facilitate these monitoring programs, a Monitoring Agreement shall be approved by the Town and recorded with the recordation of the Final Map. This agreement shall outline each property owner's responsibility for contribution to the ongoing monitoring programs twelve months or twenty four months after recordation of the Final Map. 20. Parcel A, when developed, shall connect to sanitary sewer. Upon recording of the Final Map, any references to leachfield shall be deleted. AYES: Commissioners Cheng, Comiso, Ellinger, Jones, Pahl NOES: None ABSENT: Chairman Noel and Commissioner Stutz Commissioner Comiso left the meeting. 4.6 LANDS OF YUNG, 13880 Campo Vista Lane: A request for a Site Development permit for a Major Addition. This item was continued at the applicant's request. 4.7 LANDS OF LAUB, 27210 Fremont Road, 344 -90 -TM: A request for approval of a Tentative Map for a four -lot subdivision. This item was continued and will be rescheduled. 5. NEW BUSINESS 5.1 Ordinance Amending Chapter 1 of Title 10 Regarding Setback Lines Commissioner Pahl suggested discussion of this issue at the next Joint City Council and Planning Commission meeting. Bill Ekern noted the Council directed this to the Planning Commission. He requested the Planning Commission Representative bring it to the City Council at their next meeting, or the Planning Commission Chair draft a letter to the Mayor with this suggestion. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED September 25th, 1991 Page 14 Commissioner Jones referred to recent street repairs, noting they received notice at 4:00 p.m. that the street would be closed the next day. Bill Ekern noted the City Council has directed him to include notification of work by mail to residents in the specifications for projects. 6. OLD BUSINESS 6.1 Consideration of scheduling of Subdivision Committee meetings PASSED BY CONSENSUS: The Planning Commission agreed by consensus to move Subdivision Committee meetings to Wednesday evenings. 7. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 11TH, 1991 Commissioner Pahl referred to page 3, second paragraph under Lands of Codispoti/Schroeder to change the last sentence to: "There was no specific intent relative to changing of the condition as stated in the past"; and fourth paragraph, he felt the minutes did not accurately reflect Ms. Netto's response. MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Jones, seconded by Cheng, and 4 passed by consensus to approve the minutes of September 11th, 1991 as amended. 8. REPORT FROM THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 18TH 1991 Commissioner Ellinger reported the City Council concurred with all Planning Commission actions on the consent calendar. Lands of Mooring was continued with a request for redesign of a single story house with a 100 foot setback from the centerline of the street. Lands of Oshima was referred to the Commission for amendment to allow only a single story house. Council's position on Bay Vision 2020 called for representation by elected officials. Council requested a memo regarding the nature of the Planning Commission's discussions with Sun Country Cable. Council asked the Environmental Design and protection Commission to make a recommmendation on fencing for Byrne Preserve, either a three rail wood fence or a top rail and wire mesh fence. 9. REPORT FROM THE SITE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE There were no meetings on September 17th or 24th, 1991. 10. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by consensus at 11:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Laura Johnson, Planning Secretary