Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/09/19996 Minutes of a Regular Meeting Approved 1/12/00 Town of Los Altos Hills PLANNING COMMISSION Thursday, December 9, 1999, 6:00 p.m. Council Chambers, 26379 Fremont Road cc: Cassettes (3) #19-99 ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Planning Commission meeting was called to order at 6:07 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Town Hall. Present: Commissioners Gottlieb, Jinkerson, Wong, Cottrell & Schreiner Staff: Curtis Williams, Planning Director; Ola Balogun, Associate Engineer; Carl Cahill, Associate Planner; Shaunn O'Connor, Assistant Planner; Lam Smith, Planning Secretary (( City Engineer: Jeff Peterson 2. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR - None 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3.1 LANDS OF GHEYRI, 27400 Elena Road (25-99-ZP-SD-GD-VAR); A request for a Site Development Permit for a new two-story residence, swimming pool, and cabana; and a variance to allow the residence and parking spaces within the front setback (continued from November 10, 1999). Discussion ensued regarding the width of the driveway, the reduced impact to the trees, the sharp tum onto the existing driveway, the interior driveway going over the drainage area three times, the partial removal of oleanders on the left side of the driveway, areas where the easement width could be reduced by two feet, and the fault trace as it relates to the pool and pool house location. OPENED PUBLIC HEARING David Tollner, 2050 De La Cruz, Santa Clara, attorney for the applicant, was available for questions. Commissioner Gottlieb questioned the stepping stones from the house to the pool over the swale. Mr. Gheyri stated the design indicates you can walk across the driveway and down the steps to the pool. There has not been a bridge planned although with the landscape plan they can include perhaps a decorative one. Planning Commission Minutes Approved 1/12/00 December 9, 1999 Page 2 Tom Knapp, 525 University Avenue, Palo Alto, attorney for John and Rosemary Wells, 27285 Elena Road, reviewed Planning Commission comments from the previous meeting noting the house plans have not been changed. He further discussed the variance findings, the applicant using all of the development and floor area allowed, and neighboring homes (Wells & Skarmoutsos) much smaller in size. The Planning Commission has the discretion to request a reduction in size. He felt the pool house was a concern if used as a secondary dwelling unit which would burden the property further. The Wells were also concerned with their access being cut off during construction (emergency situations) and due to their age, pedestrian access would be a problem. The Planning Director suggested having the City Engineer monitor any possible delays or blockage of the access road. Mr. Knapp offered to draft language for condition #18 for staff review. He asked for stronger and/or expanded wording for condition #17 to address possible stray trucks damaging the underground utilities servicing the Wells property. Access and drainage are both a concern. Terry Szewczyk, 91 First Street, San Jose, civil engineer for John and Rosemary Wells, 27285 Elena Road, stated concerns with widening the driveway. He requested review of the grading and drainage plan prior to approval by the City Engineer. Jeff Peterson reviewed condition #13. He felt there was no problem with Mr. Szewczyk reviewing the grading and drainage plan with no rights of rejection. The Planning Director suggested he review the current plans and provide the City Engineer with any concerns. Paul Chalmers, 601 California Avenue, Palo Alto, attorney for the Marayas, reiterated comments presented at the previous meeting regarding the easement which runs very close to the backside of the Maraya house (bedroom side). He felt the Commission should require, as a condition of any development, that some measures are in place for reduction of sound vibration, dust, and whatever other impacts may occur during construction. He suggested a sound wall /barrier along the road easement. He had obtained a proposal from a consultant which he had provided to Mr. Gheyri's attorney at the previous meeting, with no response. Given the changes to the easement which will increase the impact to the Maraya residence, he reiterated this point and concern, requesting the sound barrier be included as a condition to the eventual construction of the new house and driveway. The proposal would be for a six foot high stone block barrier along the property line. This will replace the hedges which are to be removed. Dianne Barrager, Pathways Committee, discussed the previous pathways request. She clarified a path is shown on the Master Pathway Plan from Robleda Road to Elena Road before Purissima Road. They are only asking for an easement. It may not be used and/or they may find another way to move people in case of an emergency. They already have many of the easements adjacent to I-280 (at least 16 easements). David Tollner responded to the request for a sound barrier which would be well over $100,000 in cost. The easement does not need to be expanded. The wall and the hedges fall within the easement that Mr. Gheyri has purchased with the property. He referred to Judge White's ruling "plaintiffs have the right to reasonably trim or if necessary remove bushes and trees in the area of the easement such that the whole width of the paved portion of the easement can be used for the Planning Commission Minutes Approved 1/12/00 December 9, 1999 Page 3 specified purposes without interference." Mr. Chalmers declaration in the action for quiet title which was dismissed, declared under oath that "the plaintiffs decided to dismiss their action because they have taken full time residence in France." He continued noting that the request for a sound wall/barrier may not be unreasonable, they have been working with the City Engineer who is well equipped and prepared to protect everyone's interest. Cyrus Gheyi, 10355 Stems Avenue, Cupertino, applicant, responded to Mr. Knapp's comments noting he is within the limitations of the MDA/MPA. He discussed the age and size of the homes surrounding him, and that the Marayas were aware of the location of the easement when they purchased their property. He should not have to resolve their misplacement of sleeping rooms with a sound wall. Also, Elena Road is a much nosier road. CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING Commissioner Cottrell understood the emotional impact on the neighbors but all of the improvements will improve the neighborhood especially as it relates to fire vehicles and safety. The fault lines and the existing easements greatly limit the location of the house. He voiced support of the project. Commissioner Gottlieb discussed the temporary hardship on the neighbors. She asked if the plantings (hedge) along the driveway could be replaced/moved to the edge of the easement. She is always concerned with granting a variance with new construction. They could move the comer of the home so it would be out of the setback. She was very concerned with the two car spaces within the setback especially because they are not connected to the main house but going to the pool house (secondary dwelling) which will produce more traffic. She also felt the front of the house should step down (change design). Commissioner Schreiner did not have much difficulty with the variance for the house as with parking in the setback. She was concerned with the neighbors during construction asking for as many safeguards as possible. Regarding the request for a sound barrier, she felt it was unreasonable. The applicant would explore replanting the hedges and work with the Wells regarding drainage concerns. Commissioner Wong shared this opinion regarding construction and working with the neighbors for new plants. Overall, he felt this was a good project. Chairman Jinkerson felt the application could work with staff regarding the elbow area to make sure the radius tum is workable and work with the Marayas regarding plants/shrubs. Mr. Peterson questioned planting oleanders along narrow areas of the easement. If oleanders are to be used, they should be located on the other side of the fence, with the consent of the neighbor. Commissioner Gottlieb provided her thoughts for a possible motion as follows: approve driveway with final drainage notification to the Wells for review; review replanting existing shrubs either within the easement (left side) or on the property line (between the driveway and home); review elbow curve for proper radius; #18, review language from Tom Knapp (Wells' attorney); setback the I-280 portion of the house and look at moving the house so a variance would not be needed; and work with staff to mitigate the need for the parking space variance. Discussion ensued Planning Commission Minutes Approved 1/12/00 December 9, 1999 Page 4 MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Commissioner Cottrell, seconded by Commissioner Wong, and amended, to approve the Site Development Permit for a new two- story residence, swimming pool, and cabana; and a variance to allow the residence and parking spaces within the front setback, Lands of Gheyri, 27400 Elena Road, with the following additions/changes to the conditions of approval: revise site plan to show the driveway turning in to the project site at a tum radius acceptable to the City Engineer; add to condition #2, that landscape planting within the driveway easement may be required to screen the driveway traffic, if determined to be feasible by staff, or on the neighbor's property with their permission; condition #18, the applicant shall maintain safe and unrestricted vehicular and pedestrian access to the Wells and Skarmoutsos' properties at all times during construction, except where authorized in writing by the City Engineer for temporary periods, providing for appropriate notice to the neighbors. The applicant shall locate, protect and provide access to all existing utilities serving neighboring properties; and the property owner shall grant an easement for ingress and egress across the property for the benefit of the properties to the north and south of the site, or shall demonstrate that such an easement already exists, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. AYES: Chairman Jinkerson, Commissioners Schreiner, Wong & Cottrell NOES: Commission Gottlieb This approval is subject to a 22 day appeal period. Brief break at 7:20 p.m. 3.2 LANDS OF ASTIZ, 13901 Edith Avenue (182-99-ZP-SD-GD); A request for a Site Development Permit for a new residence, and secondary dwelling unit (continued from November 10, 1999). Staff had nothing further to add to the report. Discussion ensued regarding the subdivision restrictions, if there was a conservation easement over the swale (just drainage easement); Water District easement; native riparian plantings; and jurisdiction over the Swale (Water District). OPENED PUBLIC HEARING Abigail Ahrens, 3295 S. San Antonio Road, Los Altos, applicant's representative, restated comments presented at the previous meeting regarding the challenge of the site and responding to the staff report. They have taken a very challenging site which meets all the rules, with no variances or exceptions, providing a charmed village approach rather than one large house. She provided an overhead display, reviewing the following: front of the property; the MDA/WA and setbacks which increased during the subdivision process; the history of the swale; and noting the ability to plant between this site and the Rogez site. She reviewed the changes to the plan and the berm in front of the wall. Planning Commission Minutes Approved 1/12/00 December 9, 1999 Page 5 Von Haws, 329 S. San Antonio Road, Los Altos, project architect, in response to a question, stating the weathervane height is seven feet above the roof line. It serves as ventilating the attic and is keeping with the style and period of the house. The Town ordinance allows such appurtenances to exceed the 27 foot maximum height limit such as a chimney or objects such as this. Ms. Ahrens stated this will not be seen from Edith Avenue, only from the small portion of the driveway. The Planning Director noted that the area scales out to 36 feet. If they are leaving the weathervane, he suggested conditioning it to be 35 feet or lower in height. Dianne Barrager, Pathways Committee, reviewed the request for a restored Type IIB path along Fremont Road and Edith Avenue, as needed. Darryl Hastings, representative for Mr. and Mrs. Rogez, voiced support of the project. CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING Commissioner Wong liked the style of the house. He felt the applicants have responded to the previous requests with no negative impact. He has reviewed the story poles and voiced support. The Planning Director noted staff concern regarding the story pole placements as they did not adequately reflect some aspects of the house. They did get the gable portion up yesterday. The story poles did not well reflect what was needed to review. Chairman Jinkerson asked the Planning Director if they had the discretion to ask the applicants to modify the gable roof on Edith Avenue? The Director responded yes, only with the necessary findings. Commissioner Schreiner asked what was the length of the structure along Edith Avenue (113 feet long). Mr. Haws was asked to explain the berm previously mentioned. He responded that some of their sound engineers have advised them that if they put a berm in front of a wall next to a busy street, it tends to deflect the sound upward. There would be a mound of earth (three feet high) in front the six foot wall. Commissioner Schreiner felt this large house 40 feet from Edith Avenue and Fremont Road was very imposing and visible. They wanted to make the house as unobtrusive as possible in this area from off-site. There will be limited landscaping area due to the setbacks and because the house is scrunched into the comer. There are two massive structures in the front giving a bulky appearance. She would like to see some of the second story accessory structure height reduced further. She felt more could be done to mitigate the site. She recommended a redesign. Commissioner Gottlieb discussed the subdivision process and what they wanted to see. Now you will see the back of the house on both sides of the road with a high porte cochere. She would like the six foot wall eliminated as it gives a fortress appearance. Commissioner Cottrell agreed with Commissioner Schreiner in that the house should be pulled down (front roof line). Chairman Jinkerson was not concerned with the six foot wall with the berth. He reviewed the code, stating the height limitation with the cupola exceeds the height limitations (not an appurtenance). Abby Ahems stated the applicants are happy to remove the cupola replacing it with a weathervane. Peter Astiz commented on the only area which is two-story (guest house). He discussed a variety of designs but felt none would be as pleasant as the design before them. All neighbors have expressed support for the project. Commissioner Schreiner asked the applicant if Planning Commission Minutes Approved 1/12/00 December 9, 1999 Page 6 they could do a further reduction. Von Haws stated, in essence, they have a single story structure except for the guest house which is not a full second floor wall. They have addressed issues presented at the previous meeting. The Planning Director concurred with Mr. Haws regarding the bonus mom over the garage (single story structure). The issue is the second floor guest unit. He does not have any suggestions regarding how to lower it and keeping the usability of the unit. The only option would be to remove it if they are trying to lower the height on the Edith Avenue frontage. Otherwise they could flatten the roof but this would be inconsistent with the design of the whole house. Mr. Haws noted if the guest unit was to be removed, it would have to go elsewhere which would make the structure even more elongated. Commissioner Schreiner was very concerned as this is the entrance to the Town. The structure is noticeable and landscaping around the perimeter will help a great deal. Commissioner Cottrell asked if the house could be rotated counter clock wise with the guest house further back. Ms. Ahems stated it cannot be rotated as six comers are on setbacks. Chairman Jinkerson felt they could work with staff to produce a landscape plan now to soften the appearance. Commissioner Gottlieb would like to see the parking moved to the other side to allow an area for planting. MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Commissioner Gottlieb and seconded by Commissioner Schreiner to continue the request for a Site Development Permit for a new residence, and secondary dwelling unit, Lands of Astiz, 13901 Edith Avenue, for redesign, b possibly rotating the house. �y AYES: Commission Gottlieb, Schreiner & Cottrell NOES: Chairman Jinkerson & Commissioners Wong Discussion ensued regarding rotating the house as suggested. Commissioner Cottrell requested reconsideration of his vote. By consensus, the vote was reconsidered. MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Commissioner Cottrell and seconded by Commissioner Wong to approve the Site Development Permit for a new residence, and secondary dwelling unit, Lands of Astiz, 13901 Edith Avenue, with the following additions/changes to the conditions of approval: show the roof height not to exceed 25 feet at any point; delete the lantern feature from the roofline of the principal structure; relocate the fifth parking space to the opposite side of the driveway to allow for further landscape screening; #2, a landscape screening and erosion control plan shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission; and, #2, the six foot high stucco wall shall be screened with a three foot high earthen berm with suitable landscaping. AYES: Chairman Jinkerson, Commissioners Wong & Cottrell NOES: Commission Gottlieb & Schreiner This approval is subject to a 22 day appeal period. fit• Brief break at 8:25 p.m. Planning Commission Minutes December 9, 1999 Page 7 Approved 1/12/00 3.3 LANDS OF BARATTA, 11675 Dawson Drive (222-99-ZP-SD-VAR); A request for a Site Development Permit for a pool, and variance to exceed the maximum development area. PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To continue this item to the January 12, 2000 meeting to allow staff the necessary time to review the topographic survey and Worksheet #2 which were submitted on November 30, 1999. The applicant was previously notified of the continuance. 3.4 LANDS OF TORABI & MAJIDI, 26861 Purissima Road (228-99-ZP-SD); A request for a Site Development Permit for a new residence. Staff introduced this item by providing recommended changes to condition #1 as the applicant has provided staff with an additional building section through the library and living room showing the interior height not exceeding 17 feet. Chairman Jinkerson disclosed that on Sunday he had met Mr. Torabi at the site and discussed the staff report. Commissioner Schreiner asked staff if the applicants were told that three story facades were discouraged. The response was yes. She asked for clarification regarding the basement on page 5 as it relates to the door to the workshop. Staff is requiring a five foot separation so the garage and the basement do not share a common wall. OPENED PUBLIC HEARING Mrs. Majidi, 1348 Bob White Avenue, Sunnyvale, applicant, discussed condition #2, stating the proposed basement is entirely underground and only the exit has access to the garage and the floor above. The garage itself is 80% underground as well. Condition #2 is imposing a considerable additional expense to them with no justification. Regarding condition #1, three story facade, the proposed design complies with most of the essential recommendations in the Residential Design Guidelines, highlighting the following reasons: retains the openness of the town setting by compacting the building in one small area rather than spreading the building all over the site; siting of the house on the lot is based on the shape and contour of the lot for proper balance and harmony; creates the least visual and privacy impact on adjacent homes; minimized bulk and mass of the building by staggering the building and breaking the mass into smaller parts; garage beneath the building minimizes the visual dominance of the garage on the public street; garage almost entirely underground; portion of garage that is not underground would hardly be visible due to existing vegetation; the leaching field a major consideration in location of the building on the site and the building footprint; and if the building is redesigned to detach the entire garage, as staff has suggested, the visual impact of a detached three car garage building sitting in front of the lot, closer to the front setback line is much greater on the public street than the proposed design. Sandy Humphries, Environmental Design Committee, suggested working with the neighbor to the right (as you face the house) to make better mitigation between the homes. Also, she asked if they would use at least one third drought tolerant plantings. rM Planning Commission Minutes Approved 1/12/00 December 9, 1999 Page 8 4W Dianne Barrager, Pathways Committee, requested construction of a Type IIB path along Purissima Road separated from the road by at least five feet. The applicant can best determine how to place the path given the restrictions. CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING Commissioner Schreiner asked for the height of the retaining walls on both sides of the garage. Glush, the architect, stated variable heights from seven feet at the garage door down to four feet. The driveway will be cut six feet to get into the garage. Commissioner Schreiner discussed the policy on basements which has been followed consistently. When following the code, the basement is free space. She further discussed three story facades and the perception of depth and bulk. She would like to see a redesign of the garage area to be more in keeping with the first floor and the basement should meet the definition. Commissioner Cottrell felt this was clearly a three story facade. He understands this is a guideline but there should be an effort to correct it. Commissioner Gottlieb has trouble with the basement and the three story facade. One way to correct this is to have the garage up higher so the basement becomes more conforming. Chairman Jinkerson agreed. Mr. Torabi discussed the three story facade providing the Commission with a rendering of the site to further discuss the questionable areas. There is only one three story facade area. He felt this was better than having a three car garage next to the house. MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Commissioner Schreiner and seconded by Commissioner Cottrell to continue the request for a Site Development Permit for a new residence, Lands of Torabi & Majidi, 26861 Purlssima Road, to January 12, 2000, at 6:00 p.m. for a redesign of the garage element so it will either be on the level of the first floor or close to the first floor to eliminate the three story facade, and the basement shall meet code or count in the floor and development area calculations. AYES: Chairman Jinkerson, Commissioners Wong, Schreiner, Cottrell & Gottlieb NOES: None 3.5 LANDS OF INGLIN, 27855 Moody Road (208-99-ZP-SD-GD-VAR); A request for a Site Development Permit for a new residence, and variance to allow encroachment of house and parking area into setback from access easement. Disclosure: All Commissioners had either spoken to the applicants over the phone or at the site. Commissioners Jinkerson and Cottrell had received a call from Mr. Taylor, neighbor to the Inglins. The Planning Director provided a brief background regarding the removal of trees from the slope, one tree on the Taylor's property and the planned replacement trees which are not current issues. Chairman Jinkerson discussed driveways to the secondary dwelling unit, one story houses on a ridgeline, and secondary units subordinate to the main structure. OPENED PUBLIC HEARING MJ Planning Commission Minutes Approved 1/12/00 December 9, 1999 Page 9 Cindy Inglin, 27855 Moody Road, applicant, discussed the house design and the request for a variance as the actual lot size is so small due to the 35.1% slope that even getting a one story structure with four bedrooms and three baths would be difficult without digging completely into the ground. This is the reason for a second story. The house is 2,681 square feet with a 1,250 unfinished basement and an attached 710 square foot garage. The existing cottage is 800 square feet. They have remodeled the cottage and plan to live there during construction of the new residence. She further discussed other design elements and the use of grasscrete or cobble stone She submitted documents regarding the Taylor's concern. There is a possibility that all of the parking spaces could go over by the cottage but it would require a retaining wall and stepped down so it would not be visible. They have met all the requirements with room for landscaping. They can plant now or later. She clarified that only the Thurstons use their portion of the access. Chairman Jinkerson was concerned with the secondary structure as it should be located on the same side of the road as the residence. He felt it would be a mistake to develop this property with the secondary structure on one side, with a through road, and the house on the other side. Mrs. Inglin thought they were at their maximum septic capacity on the house side of the property. In 1998, they spent $85,000 remodeling the secondary unit. She did not see anyway to move the secondary unit. Carol Thurston, 27857 Moody Road, voiced support. Dianne Barrager, Pathways Committee, reiterated the Committee request to retain the existing pathway easement. She asked for clarification from staff as the report indicates it traverses the lower portion of the north slope. Sandy Humphries, Environmental Design Committee, voiced difficulty with the removal of so many trees as it ruins the habitat for the wildlife. One thing that needs to be done is the habitat needs to be rejuvenated. She had recommended to Mrs. Inglin to contact a landscaper like Erin O'Doherty with Native Revival Nursery who specializes in replanting and rejuvenating of the wildlife habitat. She suggested building the house first, then look at oak tree replacement. At the same meeting, Commissioner Gottlieb suggested moving the house five feet to avoid impact to the 60" oak tree. Ms. Humphries agreed with the suggestion. CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING Commissioner Cottrell felt this was a difficult lot and he would have liked to see a one story structure. However, he could support the project. Commissioner Gottlieb asked if pavers could be used instead of asphalt for guest parking with engineering and Fire Department approval (mixture of materials). She understood they do not have the area needed for a one story structure as it is a constrained lot She requested any conservation easement fencing remain open to provide for the flow of wildlife. Commissioner Schreiner shared Chairman Jinkerson's concerns regarding the two homes. However, it is an existing situation. She was also concerned with the c minimum parking available although the secondary dwelling cannot be expanded. She would `• like to see different materials used for the secondary dwelling to make it more compatible to the main structure and landscaping around the parking area. Commissioner Wong agreed with Planning Commission Minutes Approved 1/12/00 December 9, 1999 Page 10 Commissioner Cottrell. He voiced support. He also liked the suggestion regarding the use of pavers and/or grasscrete. Chairman Jinkerson discussed the variance and the findings. He did not know how he could tell this applicant they cannot have a two story home when the neighbor has a three story structure. He was troubled with the 27 foot house on top of a ridgeline. The Commission can request a reduction to 24 to 25 feet. He also was troubled with a 14 to 15 foot access road splitting the site. He also suggested adding a condition for restoring the site due to the removal of the trees. MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Commissioner Schreiner and seconded by Commissioner Cottrell to approve the Site Development Permit for a new residence, and variance to allow encroachment of house and parking area into setback from access easement, Lands of Inglin, 27855 Moody Road, with the following additions/changes to the conditions of approval: revised plans to show the house a minimum of two to five feet further away from the existing 60" oak tree; revise the parking configuration to minimize impervious surface and provide additional area for landscape screening; show the use of pavers for parking and tum around areas; provide a plan for restoring and re -vegetating the woodland habitat removed or damaged by the applicant, prepared by a qualified habitat restoration specialist; the existing cottage shall be resided with shingles that match the color and texture of the shingles proposed for the new residence; and no fencing is permitted in or around conservation easement areas except open fencing that allows for the movement of wildlife. AYES: Commissioners Wong, Gottlieb, Cottrell & Schreiner NOES: Chairman Jinkerson This approval is subject to a 22 day appeal period. 3.6 LANDS OF BOYD, 12150 El Monte Avenue (8-99-ZP-SD-GD-CDP-VAR); A request for a Site Development Permit for a new residence, and variances to exceed allowable floor area and development area, and to allow parking to encroach into the required setback. The applicant requested a continuance to the January 12, 2000 meeting. The Commissioners agreed to start the January 12`h meeting at 6:00 p.m. 4. OLD BUSINESS 4.1 Report from subcommittees. The Land Use Committee will meet December 13th. 5. NEW BUSINESS -none 6. REPORT FROM THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING 6.1 November 18`h — Joint Session and Lands of Finn was discussed by the Planning Director. Planning Commission Minutes December 9, 1999 Page 11 Approved 1117100 6.2 Planning Commission Representative for December 2Id, Curtis Williams, reported on the following items: historic preservation of Morgan Manor; rebuilding of Town Hall; and the Lands of Packard. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 7.1 Approval of the November 10, 1999 minutes PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To approve the November 10, 1999 minutes with minor additions. 8. REPORT FROM SITE DEVELOPMENT HEARINGS, NOVEMBER 16 23 & 30 1999 8.1 LANDS OF AURELIO, 25320 La Loma Drive (250-99-ZP-SD); A request for a Site Development Permit for pool and a 1,000 square foot pool house. Approved with conditions November 16, 1999. 8.2 LANDS OF JANSSEN & SESSIONS, 26415 Anacapa Drive (273-99-ZP-SD); A request for a Site Development Permit for landscape screening plan. Approved with conditions November 23, 1999. 8.3 LANDS OF HARARI, 12580 Miraloma Way (291-99-ZP-SD); A request for a E Site Development Permit for a landscape screening plan. Approved with conditions November 30, 1999 9. REPORT FROM FAST TRACK HEARINGS — NOVEMBER 23. 1999 9.1 LANDS OF ROCCHETTI & HERDELL, 27371 Moody Road (136-97-ZP-SD- GD); A request for a Site Development Permit for a new residence. Approved with conditions. 10. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by consensus at 10:45 p.m. Re spectfully submitted, Planning Secretary