Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/17/2008Minutes of a Regular Meeting Approved 02/21/08 Town of Los Altos Hills PLANNING COMMISSION THURSDAY, January 17, 2008, 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers, 26379 Fremont Road ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The regular meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Town Hall. Present: Chairman Carey, Commissioners Clow, Collins, Cottrell and Harpootlian Staff: Debbie Pedro, Planning Director; Nicole Horvitz, Assistant Planner; Richard Chiu, City Engineer; Cyrus Kianpour, Consultant Engineer; and Victoria Ortland, Planning Secretary PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR - none L 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS �/ 3.1 LANDS OF LOS ALTOS HOMES, LLC, 26462 Purissima Road, File #166-07- ZP-SD-GD; A request for a Site Development Permit for a 10,975 square foot two-story new residence (maximum height: 27 feet), a 960 square foot detached single story secondary dwelling unit, tennis court, swimming pool and horse barn. CEQA Review: Categorical Exemption per Section 15303 (a) & (e) (Staff -Brian Froelich). Ex Parte Contacts Policy Disclosure: Commissioner Harpootlian attended the October 23, 2007 Fast Track public hearing for the project. Debbie Pedro, Planning Director, presented the staff report for the project proposal of a two- story 10,975 square foot residence, 960 square foot second unit, 200 square foot horse bam, swimming pool and tennis court. The two acre vacant site with a 7.3 average slope is surrounded by one-story and two-story homes. There had been neighbor concerns expressed over drainage and visual impacts. The runoff from the property will be collected into a detention facility with a total capacity of 1,890 cubic feet (14,000 gallons), flow through a four inch pipe to a culvert and then offsite. The site currently has virtually no landscaping. Commissioner Cottrell asked if the project had been originally scheduled for a Fast Track hearing. 4 Planning Commission Minutes Approved 02/21/08 January 17, 2008 Page 2 Debbie Pedro confirmed that the project had been scheduled for a Fast Track hearing because it had conformed to all of the zoning requirements. Neighbor concerns raised at the public hearing had caused the project to be forwarded to the Planning Commission. Cyrus Kianpour, Consultant Engineer, stated that the project met all the Town's engineering standards. He explained that the Town's requirement for any proposed development project was to maintain the amount of drainage runoff from the site to pre -development conditions. The difference between the pre -development and the post development runoff must be detained in a system and be released over a period of time. The project's drainage system was designed to be self draining. It exceeds the storage requirement and the piping system had been moved up the slope to give the system the ability to drain itself in 24 hours to prepare for the next storm. The 12 inch culvert under the driveway matched the size of other culverts downstream. Chairman Carey asked what the distance was from the new buildings to the neighboring Kirkpatrick and Jambulingam properties. Debbie answered that the closest point to the Kirkpatrick's property was 38 feet from the corner of the new garage and 33 feet to the Jambulingam's property. Commissioner Cottrell asked staff to comment on possible ambient noise changes for the neighborhood and sound walls that had been removed from the plans. 4 Debbie explained that per the recently updated General Plan, sound walls were discouraged. The applicant had proposed a 6 foot block wall on the comer of the property. The wall met all the fence requirements and is not considered a sound wall. The professional acoustic engineer hired by the applicant reported that there would be a negligible increase in the ambient noise after construction. Manish Gupta, applicant, explained that meetings had been held with the neighbors to help clarify their key concerns and listen to their suggestions for solutions. The resulting proposed options were discussed with the Town planning and engineering staff. In response to noise concerns, Mei Wu Acoustics, a firm with expertise in acoustics and sound, had been hired to study the levels of proposed noise from the property. The new drainage system had been designed to capture the increased run-off from the property and restrict it to pre -development amounts. He stated they had increased the retention capacity to 1,890 cubic feet from 945 cubic feet and created a self draining system. The proposed driveway had been designed with a slope of 2.5 percent. The sewer mainlines had been designed to accommodate neighbors on the other side of Purissima Road who wanted to hook-up. Six neighbors had shown interest in joining the new sewer line. T joints will be provided at time of construction for connection at that time or will be installed for connection at a later time. There was neighbor concern over views and the bulk of the house. Relocating the house was requested by one of the neighbors and had been considered, but then a different neighbor asked that the house remain in the original location. Commissioner Harpootlian asked what distance had been considered for relocation of the house. Planning Commission Minutes Approved 02/21/08 January 17, 2008 Page 3 Ninh Le, engineer for the applicant, explained that one of the suggestions had been to move the house to be clear of the line of sight from the Kirkpatrick's home. That would be approximately 40 to 60 feet to the south. Mr. Gupta stated that the proposed home is 300 feet back from Purissima Road and conformed to the setback requirement of the Town's Estate Home Ordinance. Planning department staff had recommended that the Planning Commission review the screening plan and he welcomed that opportunity. Twenty-three trees are planned for the north side of the property and fourteen trees along the west side of the property. The trees being considered include Coast redwood, ash or Live oak with a height of 14 to 15 feet tall at planting. The sound wall was removed from the plan because it would reflect noise instead of absorb noise. A noise report was submitted to the Town in December, 2007. Chairman Carey asked what the impact would be on the plans for the site if the home were relocated more to the southerly direction. Mr. Gupta said that the plan would be significantly impacted considering their vision for the other structures on the site. Ninh Le, explained that as the location of the house is moved south it is also moved upslope and would no longer meet the Town ordinance for the maximum cut and fill. Chairman Carey asked why the previously proposed sound wall was no longer considered necessary. Mr. Le stated that the location of the previously planned sound wall would cause noise from Interstate 280 to be reflected back toward Mr. Kirkpatrick's house. OPENED PUBLIC HEARING Bob Kirkpatrick, Purissima Road, expressed his concerns about the accuracy of the noise study as measurements are given in both feet and meters. He wished to have the noise issue re- examined to measure the reflected sound from the new development on all the neighboring homes. He felt the noise from the air conditioners in the proposed location would prevent the ability to leave the doors and windows of his house open, especially at night. He thought the headlights from vehicles using the proposed driveway for site arrival, parking and garage access would be directed into the windows of his home. The number of people visiting the home could cause a problem with cars using Purissima Road, his driveway or the Hickman's driveway for parking. He felt that the home was designed to catch the attention of onlookers passing by on Purissima Road, which could create a safety hazard. His privacy on his deck and in his home would be compromised by the proposed house and the placement of the windows. He was also worried about potential drainage problems on the project site. Commissioner Harpootlian asked Mr. Kirkpatrick if moving the house 10 to 15 feet to the south would make a difference in his privacy concerns. He asked what distance the house would need to be moved to solve his problems with the project. Planning Comnrission Minutes Approved 02/21/08 January 17, 2008 Page 4 Mr. Kirkpatrick replied that 10 to 15 feet would make a difference in the privacy for the master bedroom but not the loft. He thought that moving the house 60 feet to the south would be the best solution. Commissioner Harpootlian asked Mr. Kirkpatrick if a row of trees placed to block the headlights from vehicles would be helpful for screening. Mr. Kirkpatrick said the trees would be helpful as long as the house was relocated. The noise and driveway problems would then be diminished. Moving the house just 10 or 15 feet would not do much but moving the house 40 to 60 feet would do a great deal. Commissioner Collins discussed with Mr. Kirkpatrick the relocation of the air conditioning units and trash collection area. Rebecca Hickman, Purissima Road, expressed support for Mr. Kirkpatrick's concerns and felt that he would be the most impacted of the neighbors by the project. Moving the house a little would solve a lot of the issues he has concerns about. Hickman's property will also be significantly affected by the development from a visual standpoint with the proximity of the new house's view into her lot and her view of the new garage area. She would benefit from the house being placed in a more central location on the site. Commissioner Harpoothan asked Rebecca how much she felt the house should be moved. Ms. Hickman said the land is fairly flat and felt it was possible to move the house to a more centralized place on the property. She would like the Planning Commission to consider the relocation of the house. Samuel Broydo, Purissima Road was concerned about the drainage from the project site. He was pleased with the changes the applicant had made to the system. He wanted to know the length of time it would take to empty the detention basin. He was convinced that the reflected noise impact deemed negligible was incorrect. The proposed trees will be important not only for privacy but also as a noise barrier. Trees with a growth habit of bushy foliage near the ground should be planted at the beginning of the project. Palaniappan Jambulingam, Purissima Road, considered that the trees would provide sufficient screening for privacy as long as they were mature at planting. He pointed out that the water from his lot drained onto the applicant's site and wanted the new driveway constructed in a way as not to make the water back-up onto his property. The proposed location of the house is fine and he could agree to have it moved a little to accommodate the privacy of the other neighbors. However, he would not like the house built directly behind his property because his views would be impacted. His house is 5 to 6 feet lower than the proposed house and if it was moved to a higher location, he would have no privacy. Paul Hickman, Purissima Road, commented that the owners of the new residence will want privacy too. The house in the current location has a major impact on the Kirkpatricks and an impact on his property. He felt that if the house could be more centered in the large area it Planning Commission Minutes Approved 02/21/08 January 17, 2008 Page 5 would minimize the average impact on all the neighbors and might be better for the future owners. Mrs. Jambulingam, Purissima Road, commented that if the house is moved further south it will impact her view and privacy. The current view of the mountain from her home will be hidden and only the new residence will be seen if the house is moved the suggested 40 to 60 feet. CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING Commissioner Clow noted that the applicant had met all the requirements for a Fast Track hearing except the agreement from the neighbors. The drainage issues had been addressed and twice the required storage capacity was being provided. Extensive landscape mitigation, including large trees, would be needed to reduce the impact of the project on the neighborhood. The Jambulingams would receive the biggest impact and lose a view if the house was moved 40 to 60 feet. He would recommend leaving the plan as proposed. Trees could mitigate the issues of headlights, the need for privacy and the increased noise. The applicant has done a good job of making as minimal of an impact possible and the plan is a good one. Commissioner Collins thought the location of the house should be moved about 30 feet so all the residents share in the view of the new house. The City Engineer should determine whether moving the house would require a grading variance. She supported planting the trees to mitigate any sound for the Kirkpatricks and Broydos. The trees could extend the length of the driveway. The air conditioners need to be moved to a location that does not impact any neighbors. The drainage culvert under the driveway should match the size of the neighbor's culverts. Commissioner Harpoothan felt the house should be moved 20 to 25 feet to the south. The air conditioners should be moved to a different location. The drainage has been properly addressed. The noise issues can be addressed with landscape screening. Commissioner Cottrell noted that since the applicant had fully developed the property, the future owner would have no opportunity to make changes as all available development area had been used. The drainage issues had been addressed adequately. The view and noise issues can be mitigated with proper landscape screening. The air conditioners should be moved and shielded to the maximum extent. A condition of approval should require that during the construction period, parking would be allowed only on the applicant's property. In terms of moving the house more to the south between the Kirkpatrick and Jambulingam houses you don't seem to gain much except along the driveway unless it would be moved a great deal. He felt that the moving of the house was a subject for further discussion. He commended the applicant on his extraordinary efforts to accommodate the neighbors, especially with the sewer system that will be an asset for the neighborhood. Chairman Carey felt that the landscape deposit should be increased to $20,000. He agreed that the air conditioners should be moved. He thought the property line should be well landscaped with trees added near the time that the house would be framed. He suggested that the Commission consider continuation of the project until the grading issues and applicant's comments on design considerations related to moving the house to the south could be further discussed. Planning Commission Minutes Approved 02/21/08 January 17, 2008 Page 6 LManish Gupta, applicant, agreed with the relocation of the air conditioning units and the landscape screening for the project. He would welcome a recommendation on the species of trees for screening. He stated that the highest point of the new residence was at Elevation 414 at the roofline. The first floor's finished height of Mr. Kirkpatricks home is Elevation 410, so only 4 feet of the new house would be seen by a person on the first floor of his home. He asked the Planning Commission to take that into consideration. The Jambulingam home is at a lower elevation than the proposed residence and would have a view 39 feet tall of the new residence. Ninh Le explained that the final layout of the driveway will be about 4 feet lower than existing grade. To meet required driveway and fire truck turnaround requirements, the drive will have less than a 5 percent grade. Bob Kirkpatrick, Purissima Road, commented that with discussion of the vehicle headlights directed toward his house from the proposed driveway, the slope of that driveway must be considered. MOTION AMENDED, SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Commissioner Cottrell and seconded by Commissioner Clow to continue the project and direct the applicant to return to the Planning Commission with a detailed landscape screening plan. ( AYES: Chairman Carey, Commissioners Clow, Collins, Cottrell and Harpootha l NOES: none MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Chairman Carey and seconded by Commissioner Cottrell to continue the project and direct the applicant to return to the Planning Commission with a study of the implications of moving the house 15 to 20 feet to the south. AYES: Chairman Carey, Commissioners Clow, Collins, Cottrell and Harpootlian NOES: none MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Commissioner Cottrell and seconded by Commissioner Clow to increase the landscape screening deposit to $20,000. AYES: Chairman Carey, Commissioners Clow, Collins, Cottrell and Harpoothan NOES: none This item will be continued to a future Planning Commission meeting 3.2 LANDS OF GOESE, 13480 Wildcrest Drive, File #205-07-ZP-SD; A request for a Site Development Permit for a landscape screening plan. CEQA Review: Categorical Exemption per Section 15304 (b) (Staff -Nicole Horvitz). ( Ex Parte Contacts Policy Disclosure: Commissioner Clow spoke to the project site superintendent; Commissioner Harpootlian had met with the general contractor at the site. Planning Commission Minutes Approved 02/21/08 January 17, 2008 Page 7 ` Nicole Horvitz, Assistant Planner, stated that the landscape screening application was before the Planning Commission per a condition of approval for the new residence approved at the July 15, 2005 Planning Commission meeting. The house is currently under construction on the crest of a ridge new the end of Wildcrest Drive. Planning Commission approved a 1,637 square foot solar panel array on the southern side of the property on February 16, 2006. A condition of the solar panel approval was that 50 percent of the panels be screened from view immediately. On the proposed landscape screening plan, 11 additional English laurel shrubs are planned around the panels in addition to those required and installed per solar panel approval. Mr. Ramsey, a neighbor who lives on Alta Lane, is requesting that mature trees be planted in front of the solar panels to screen them from his view. Outdoor lighting is also requested with the application. Tom Klope, Landscape Architect representing the applicant, explained that the goal of the screening plan was to screen the home from offsite while preserving the homes spectacular views. To construct the required fire truck and driveway access to the property, several substantial trees had to be removed and new trees have been planted. The solar panels are screened with English laurel shrubs and eight 24 inch box California Live oak trees planted on the slope below the panels as specified in the solar panel conditions of approval. Commissioner Harpoothan asked about the location, size and growth rate of the oaks trees. Tom Klope replied that the oak trees were 12 to 14 feet tall when planted, permanently irrigated 6W and should grow about 2 feet per year. Commissioner Collins felt the English laurel shrubs did a good job softening the hard edges of the solar panels without shading them from the sun. Tom Klope stated that the extra English laurels on the proposed landscape screening plan were added at the request of Mr. Ramsey. OPENED PUBLIC HEARING Mike Ramsey, Alta Lane, explained that his property was about 700 feet away from the Goese's solar panels at approximately the same elevation. The solar panel array with its rectangular shape was huge and had a very high impact on the beautiful rolling landscape. About $10,000 had been spent to plant and move trees on his property to mitigate some of the solar panel view from the first floor of his home. Unfortunately, the view from the upper level of the house cannot be addressed in that way because of its height. He requested that the Planning Commission consider requiring additional, taller, more mature trees to be placed further down the hill. The location of these larger trees would provide needed screening immediately and would not block the sun from reaching the solar panels. Commissioner Clow asked Mr. Ramsey his opinion of the laurel shrubs around the solar panels. Mr. Ramsey felt that his objective not to see the panels was a fair and reasonable request 4 considering what was on the site before the solar panel installation. Chairman Carey asked if Mr. Ramsey had a specific type, size or number of trees in mind. Planning Commission Minutes Approved 02/21/08 January 17, 2008 Page 8 Mr. Ramsey replied that the objective was to fully screen the solar panels from view. He did not have a preferred selection for a particular tree. A taller, fast growing evergreen tree planted further down the hill to screen above the base of the hill should help with the screening. Chairman Carey asked Tom Klope to comment on Mr. Ramsey's request Tom Klope responded that access to the site is somewhat of an issue. A crane would be required in that location to maneuver a tree in a 36 inch or larger box. For oak trees, a 24 inch box is generally the maximum desired size because they soon catch up to the larger trees. If larger trees are required, the current 24 inch box oaks will need to be removed. Native plant material is required in this area of the property because of the conservation easement. Commissioner Collins wanted confirmation that any larger size tree brought to that area of the site would require a crane to move. Tom Klope answered that a crane would be needed for a tree in a 36 inch or larger box. Commissioner Clow asked what the current height of the English laurel was and how high the shrubs will grow. Tom Klope replied that the height of the English laurel was presently about 5 feet tall and would 4W be allowed to grow to 7 feet high before trimming to prevent shading of the solar panels. The shrubs may reach the 7 feet height by the end of the coming summer and would be maintained at that height. CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING Commissioner Cottrell did not think the Town should encourage solar panel installation and then demand extensive screening. He felt the applicant had done everything that the Town had asked. The oak trees will grow and with the additional English laurels he saw no reason to ask for more screening Commissioner Harpootlian saw no reason to change the landscape screening plan. As the oak trees grow, the sharpness of the solar panels will be broken up and the panels will blend more into the landscape. Commissioner Collins stated that the English laurel shrubs do a good job at screening the edge of the solar panels. She did not support required planting of more trees. The applicants had met the Town's requirements and the screening would be adequate as the oak trees grow. Commissioner Clow felt that as the English laurels grow to 7 feet in height, more of the solar panel view would be screened. He recommended no change in the number of trees required. Chairman Carey agreed with his fellow Commissioners that the proposed screening plan was adequate. Planning Commission Minutes Approved 02/21/08 January 17, 2008 Page 9 `r MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Commissioner Clow and seconded by Commissioner Cottrell to approve the site development permit for a landscape screening plan, Lands of Goese, 13480 Wildcrest Drive, subject to the recommended conditions in Attachment 1. AYES: Chairman Carey, Commissioners Clow, Collins, Cottrell and Harpootlian NOES: none This recommendation is subject to a 22 day appeal period. 3.3 Final Map Certificate of Correction for Parcel Map No. 710 dated December 10, 1998; A request to modify an irrevocable dedication of storm drain easement series no. 14545156. (Staff -Richard Chiu). Ex Parte Contacts Policy Disclosure: Commissioner Clow spoke to a neighboring property owner; Commissioner Harpootlian spoke to Jitze Couperus and had sent a memo to the neighboring property owners requesting their input. Richard Chiu, City Engineer reported that in October of 1998 the subdivision for Lands of Rogez was approved by the City Council. As part of the subdivision, an offer of irrevocable dedication for storm drain easement for water management and storm drain purposes had been proposed. The City Council rejected the offer of the easement but reserved the right to accept it at a future time. The intention was to sign the easement over to the Santa Clara Water District for flood `, control purposes. With the development of the Adobe Creek Reach 5 restoration project, the SCV WD had been working with the property owners to obtain easements for the construction of the creek restoration project. The Town proposes that upon offer and acceptance of all necessary easements by SCV WD, the original irrevocable offer to the Town be terminated. OPENED PUBLIC HEARING Jitze Couperus, Page Mill Road, explained that three easements: flood protection, mitigation and temporary construction, must be granted by the property owners to the SCV WD before the Town will release the dedication offer. CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Commissioner Clow and seconded by Commissioner Collins to forward the recommendation to the City Council for approval of the Certificate of Correction. AYES: Chairman Carey, Commissioners Clow, Collins, Cottrell and Harpoodian NOES: none This recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council to be heard at a future meeting Planning Conanission Minutes January 17, 2008 Page 10 4. OLD BUSINESS - none NEW BUSINESS 5.1 DECONSTRUCTION PERMITS Approved 02/21/08 Debbie Pedro, Planning Director, presented the new deconstruction brochure. She reported that in November 2007, the City Council as part of the incentive program to promote green building and construction had approved a fee waiver for deconstruction permits. For applicants choosing to deconstruct an existing building for recycling purposes, there would be no fee and the deconstruction permit will be issued at time of approval instead of waiting until the building permit for the new structure is issued. Sandy Humphries, Environmental Design Committee, commented that the Environmental Design and Protection Committee had been distributing educational pamphlets on deconstruction for a long time and was glad that the Town had developed its own brochure. 5.2 SOLAR REPORT Nicole Horvitz, Assistant Planner stated that for the 3rd and 4" quarter of 2007, permits for 29 roof mounted and 4 ground mounted solar panel systems were issued. The average size of the solar panel installations approved was 576 square feet. New residences accounted for two of the permits and two applications took advantage of the solar panel development area bonus. The Planning Commission requested a change in the Solar Report presentation to an annual basis. 6. REPORT FROM THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING 6.1 Planning Commission Representative for November 8ih — Commissioner Carey 6.2 Planning Commission Representative for November 22"d- Cancelled 6.3 Planning Commission Representative for December 13`h — Commissioner Harpootlian reported on the Parks and Recreation fund allocation considerations. 6.4 Planning Commission Representative for December 27" — Cancelled 6.5 Planning Commission Representative for January 10" — Commissioner Harpootlian reported on the Los Altos/Los Altos Hills shared recreation programs status and the introduction to City Council of the Estate Homes Ordinance. 6.6 Planning Commission Representative for January 24`h — Commissioner Carey APPROVAL OF MINUTES 7.1 Approval of November 1, 2007 minutes MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED BY CONSENSUS: Motion by Commissioner Cottrell and seconded by Commissioner Harpootlian to approve the November 1, 2007 minutes as presented. Planning Commission Minutes January 17, 2008 Page 11 Approved 02/21/08 Commissioner Harpootlian reported on the Water Conservation Committee. He stated that per discussion at a Water Conservation Committee meeting, landscape screening plans should contain information with regard to water use. He would like to present this issue at the next Planning Commission meeting. REPORT FROM FAST TRACK MEETING — NOVEMBER 13 AND DECEMBER 18, 2007 8.1 LANDS OF ORR, 26285 Altamont Road, File #168-07-ZP-SD-GD; A request for a Site Development Permit for a new two story 5,565 square foot residence (maximum height: 28'). CEQA Review: Categorical Exemption per Section 15303(a) (Staff- Nicole Horvitz) (CONTINUED AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT). 8.2 LANDS OF MERU, LLC, 27241 Altamont Road, File #197-07-ZP-SD-GD; A request for a Site Development Permit for a 2,151 square foot major addition and remodel to the existing 9,403 square foot residence. The project includes a reconfigured driveway, removal of an accessory building, and remodel of an existing cabana. CEQA Review: Categorical Exemption per Section 15301(e) (Staff -Brian Froelich) (Approved with conditions). 9. REPORT FROM SITE DEVELOPMENT MEETING — NOVEMBER 13, NOVEMBER 27 DECEMBER 18, 2007 AND JANUARY 15, 2008 9.1 LANDS OF BOURGAN, 25875 Estacada Way, File 4207-07-ZP-SD; A request for a Fence Permit to construct a partial perimeter fence along the property boundary. The proposal includes an iron fence along the western property boundary and a solid redwood fence along the southern property boundary. CEQA review: Categorical Exemption per Section 15303 (e) (Staff -Brian Froelich) (Approved with conditions). 9.2 LANDS OF BOYNTON, 25045 Oneonta Drive, File #208-07-ZP-SD; A request for a Site Development Permit for landscape screening of a new 4,608 square foot two-story residence approved in July, 2006. CEQA review: Categorical Exemption per Section 15304 (b) (Staff -Brian Froelich) (Approved with conditions). 9.3 LANDS OF PICETTI, 12390 Hilltop Drive, File #184-07-ZP-SD; A request for a Site Development Permit for landscape screening of a 4,978 square foot two-story residence approved in June, 2006. CEQA review: Categorical Exemption per Section 15304 (b) (Staff -Brian Froelich) (Approved with conditions). 9.4 LANDS OF MOCK, 26360 Calle Del Sol; File 9215-07-ZP-SD; A request for a Site Development Permit for a landscape screening plan. CEQA review: Categorical Exemption per Section 15304 (b) (Staff -Nicole Horvitz) (Approved with conditions). Planning Commission Minutes Approved 02/21/08 January 17, 2008 Page 12 44W 9.5 LANDS OF PARVARANDEH, 27210 Ohlone Lane; File 9244-07-ZP-SD; A request for a Site Development Permit for a landscape screening plan. CEQA review: Categorical Exemption per Section 15304 (b) (Staff -Nicole Horvitz) (Approved with conditions). 10. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by consensus at 9:33 p.m. /Respectfully / mii�ittte//d, Victoria Ortland Planning Secretary ow N