HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/04/1992 Minutes of a Regular Meeting
March 4, 1992
Town of Los Altos Hills
City Council Meeting
Wednesday, March 4, 7:15 P.M.
Council Chambers, 26379 Fremont Road
1. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL, AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Hubbard called the Regular Meeting of the City Council to order at 7:15
p.m. in the Council Chambers at Town Hall.
Present: Mayor Hubbard and Councilmembers Casey, Johnson,
Siegel and Tryon.
Absent: None
Staff: City Manager Les M. Jones, II; City Attorney Sandy Sloan;
Town Planner Linda Niles; Engineering Consultant Jeff
Peterson and City Clerk Pat Dowd
Press: None
Hubbard noted the following two changes to the agenda: Item 4.4 Adoption of
Resolution Designating Santa Clara County as the Lead
Enforcement Agency for the Town continued to the first meeting in April
and request to add a resolution ordering and calling a Special Municipal
Election to be held in the Town of Los Altos Hills on June 2, 1992;
requesting the services of the Registrar of Voters; requesting consolidation
of elections and providing for giving notice of the election to the agenda as
an urgency item.
The City Clerk noted that this resolution needed to be adopted to consolidate the
advisory ballot measure on fire retardant roofing with the June 2, 1992 election.
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Tryon, seconded by Johnson
and passed unanimously to add a resolution ordering and calling a Special
Municipal Election to be held in the Town of Los Altos Hills on June 2,
1992; requesting the services of the Registrar of Voters; requesting
consolidation of elections and providing for giving notice of the election
to the consent calendar as an urgency item.
2. APPOINTMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS
March 4, 1992
I
Mayor Hubbard congratulated Jeff Peterson on his appointment as the Town's
Director of Public Works/City Engineer.
3. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
Commissioner Jones reported that at their February 26th meeting the following
issues were discussed in addition to those items listed on the Council's Consent
Calendar: Lands of Flack, 13070 Alta Lane South - request to establish a conditional
use permit for a cellular telephone "Cell Site" facility and a site development permit
for a remodel, pool house and decking was continued to their next meeting for
additional information; and Lands of Laub, 27210 Fremont Road - recommended
approval of a tentative map for a four-lot subdivision. In response to inquiries from
Council, Commissioner Jones reported that the discussion on the Laub project
included the following issues: private versus public road, trees in the creek and
removal of certain structures on the property. It was further noted that the
Council's public hearing on the tentative map for Lands of Laub was scheduled for
March 18th.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
Items Removed: 4.1 - February 19, 1992 Regular Meeting Minutes (Tryon); 4.3c
flaW (Siegel) and 4.4 - continued to April 1st meeting (Hubbard)
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Johnson, seconded by Tryon and
passed unanimously to approve the balance of the Consent Calendar, specifically:
4.1 Approved Minutes: February 19, 1992 (Adjourned Regular)
4.2 Proclaimed March 1992 as "Save Your Vision" Month
4.3 Considered Whether To Review the following Planning Commission
Actions at Its Meeting on February 26, 1992:
4.3a Lands of Sykes, 26932 Beatrice Lane: request for a site development
permit for an addition/remodel and swimming pool
4.3b Lands of Komo, 23225 Ravensbury Avenue: request for a site
development permit for an addition
March 4, 1992
2
4.4 Adopted Resolution #4-92 ordering and calling a Special Municipal
Election to be held in the Town of Los Altos Hills on June 2, 1992;
requesting the services of the Registrar of Voters; requesting consolidation
of elections and providing for giving notice of the election to the consent
calendar as an urgency item
Items Removed:
4.1 Approval of Minutes: February 19, 1992 (Regular Meeting)
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Tryon, seconded by Hubbard and
passed unanimously to approve the minutes of the February 19, 1992 Regular City
Council Meeting with the following corrections: page 9, Item 11.1, insert the
following before the consensus vote: "Tryon requested that the ordinance also state
that meetings shall not go beyond 11:00 p.m. without an affirmation vote of the
Council."; page 10, Item 11.4, second sentence should read: "She noted that this
meeting which addressed, in part, issues relating to regional rail priorities was
originally not going to be a public hearing."
4.3c Lands of Liu, 26751 Almaden Court: request for a site development
permit for a new residence and swimming pool
Siegel referred to the new policy adopted recently by the Council for the marking of
new homes. Since Mr. Owen was working on the Liu project as well as the Ben-
Artzi project which was before Council at this meeting, Siegel commented that the
Ben-Artzi project had not been adequately marked. The purpose of the marking was
to show the bulk of the house.
Bob Owen, developer, stated that he had hoped the Liu project would be approved at
this meeting. It was a small second story, stepped back and the project had been
going on for a long time. In addition he noted that he had taken a series of
photographs of the project and had put up story poles.
Siegel stated that this project was also projected to be built to the maximum
development areas allowed and he intended to request review of all such projects.
Council requested review of the Planning Commission's approval of request for a
site development permit for a new residence and swimming pool, Lands of Liu,
26751 Almaden Court.
5. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR
`► March 4, 1992
3
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
6.1 Request for a Site Development Permit for a New Residence, Tennis
Court and Swimming Pool, Lands of Ben-Artzi, 27800 Via Feliz
Bob Owen, developer, commented on the redesign of the Ben-Artzi project.
They had removed the second story and placed the second story at the rear
of the house. He further noted that screening for the project would not be
a problem; they were using 24" box trees.
June Dean, 27677 Lupine, commented on the visual impact of the Ben-Artzi
project on her property. She was concerned about her view and believed
that the screenings for the project would not be adequate. She thought
there should be lower screenings as well. Ms. Dean also expressed
concerns about drainage and the larger footprint of the house. She
suggested that mitigating plantings be done right away and extensive
maintenance agreements be required especially since they had already cut
down so many trees on the property.
Dot Schreiner, 14301 Saddle Mountain Drive, commented on the view from
their home of the Ben-Artzi project and noted that they would still see 24'
high poles.
Tryon commended the Ben-Artzis and Bob Owen for addressing the issues
raised earlier by the Council and residents concerning this project. She
noted that lowering the pitch of the roof and the eaves would also be
helpful and she had mentioned this to Mr. Owen. Hubbard also believed
that the intent of the Council's comments had been met and asked if
putting in plantings ahead of time was practical.
Bob Owen, developer, noted they had no problem with putting in plantings
early as long as it was within reason. They just did not want to plant and
then have it ruined with construction. Mr. Owen further commented that
he would be bringing in the landscape plan .
Johnson stated that he was disappointed that this project had not been marked
as well as it should have been. The house was sitting on a ridgeline and
he still had some concerns although it did fit in better to the environment
that it had before the redesign.
March 4, 1992
4
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Tryon, seconded by Hubbard
and passed unanimously to approve a site development permit for a new
residence, tennis court and swimming pool for Lands of Ben-Artzi, 27800
Via Feliz, subject to the conditions approved by the Planning
Commission.
Tryon also asked the applicants and their developer to work with the neighbors
and also requested that they lower the pitch of the roof and extend the
eaves.
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
7.1 Ordinance # Changing Time of Council Meetings and Format of
Council Agendas
Council discussed the proposed ordinance which included a revised format for
Council Agendas to reflect public hearings starting at 7:00 p.m. It was
decided to delete this section from the ordinance and to leave the format
of the agendas to the Mayor and the City Manager.
Elayne Dauber, 27930 Roble Alto, suggested that Presentations From the Floor
be scheduled at 7:00 p.m. with Public Hearings following. Council agreed
with this suggestion.
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Tryon, seconded by Johnson
and passed unanimously to waive further reading of ordinance.
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Johnson, seconded by Siegel
and passed unanimously to introduce Ordinance #350 regarding meetings
with the deletion of the section on order of business.
7.2 Discussion of Council Calendar
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Tryon, seconded by Johnson
and passed unanimously to cancel the August 5, 1992 City Council
Meeting.
The Town Planner noted that she would advise the Planning Commission of
this decision. In addition the City Manager asked that he be authorized to
approve weed abatement during that period of time when Council would
March 4, 1992
5
thr
not be meeting and the Mayor suggested that the City Manager be given
permanent authority to approve weed abatement. The City Attorney
would look into this possibility. Tryon also noted that by July 1st the
Town should be 'fire-safe' and the Fire Department should be reminded of
this goal.
8. NEW BUSINESS
8.1 Request from the Santa Clara County Cities Association for a Position
on the Development of a Consensus Position on the Issue of
Representation on the Interim Board of a Regional Government
Council had before them a request for a consensus position on the issue of
representation on the interim board of a regional government. Tryon
commented that while she was respectful of the effort being made, she was
opposed to Senate Bill 797. She did not believe this was a good bill for the
residents of Los Altos Hills and she believed that the Council by
commenting on aspects of the bill such as the interim board appeared to be
implicitly approving the bill. Siegel commented on his recent meeting in
Sacramento which addressed growth management and he noted that the
Governor also was not in favor of the bill.
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Tryon, seconded by Johnson
and passed by the following roll call vote to reaffirm the position that the
Town was opposed to Senate Bill 797 and to direct Councilmember
Johnson, the Council representative to the Santa Clara County Cities
Association, to handle responses to related issues to this bill.
AYES: Mayor Hubbard and Councilmembers Johnson and Tryon
NOES: Councilmembers Casey and Siegel
8.2 Consideration of Proposed Increase in the City of San Jose Landfill
Business Tax from $3.00 per ton to $13 per ton
Council had before them the City Manager's staff report which included the
recommendation that the City Council go on record in opposition to the
proposed tax increase.
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Johnson, seconded by Siegel
and passed unanimously to approve a letter being sent from the Town to
the Mayor of San Jose going on record in opposition to proposed increase
in the City of San Jose landfill business tax from $3.00 per ton to $13 per
ton.
kir
March 4, 1992
6
(1111W Siegel also asked the City Attorney to check with other attorneys on the
possibility of a lawsuit. San Jose was not taxing their own residents with
this increase and there was no limit to the tax. They could raise it every
year. Tryon also noted that when the landfill issue was initially discussed
it was a regional issue and a commitment had been made to the cities
involved. It seemed possible that the cities had been misinformed.
9. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES, SUB-COMMITTEES, AND
COUNCILMEMBERS ON OUTSIDE AGENCIES
9.1 Finance Committee
9.1.1 Report on Reimbursement Policy for City Councilmembers
and Mid-Year Budget
At the 12/18/91 City Council Meeting, Council agreed to establish their $150
monthly compensation as salary and to allow for reimbursement of up to
$150 per month for actual and necessary expenses incurred in the
performance of official duties per Government Code Section 36514.5. At
both the 1/15/92 and 2/19/92 Council Meetings this issue was discussed
again and referred to the Finance Committee for a recommendation.
4IW Philip Dauber, Chairman - Finance Committee, referred to his committee
report dated 2/20/92 which included the recommendation that the Town
give each Councilmember a monthly stipend of $250 in lieu of expense
reimbursement. This amount would yield each Councilmember
approximately $150 after tax withholding. This amount was also in lieu of
specific expense reimbursment, except those approved by Council
beforehand, such as attending out of town overnight meetings. Mr.
Dauber stated that they believed this included the current $20 fee which
Councilmembers received for attending certain meetings to outside
agencies. He also noted that this policy would not be effective until July 1,
1992.
Councilmembers discussed the committee's recommendation of $250 per
month as opposed to the possible $300 per month ($150 month salary plus
up to $150 per month expenses). Some of the issues raised were the
amount of salary per month, what expenses could be reimbursed and
payment ($20 per meeting) for attendance at certain meetings at outside
agencies. A discussion also followed on the reimbursement policy
regarding Planning Commissioners.
March 4, 1992
7
e MOTION SECONDED AND WITHDRAWN: Moved by Siegel, seconded by
`, Casey and withdrawn to authorize paying Commissioners $25 per meeting
attended, at an amount not to exceed $50/month.
Commissioner Jones stated that he believed the expense payment was too
much.
It was agreed to agendize the reimbursement policy for Planning
Commissioners for a future Council Meeting and to ask for the
Commissioners comments on the issue in the meantime.
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Tryon, seconded by Johnson
and passed by the following roll call vote to approve the Finance
Committee's recommendation of giving each Councilmember a monthly
stipend of $250 in lieu of expense reimbursement. This would not include
the current $20 fee which Councilmembers received for attending certain
meetings to outside agencies.
AYES: Mayor Hubbard and Councilmembers Johnson, Siegel and Tryon
NOES: Councilmember Casey
Casey voted no because the increase in salary was not all inclusive of local
expenses. Casey felt that the raise should include all local expenses.
Siegel raised the issue of Councilmembers joining PERS and it was agreed this
option would be brought to a future Council Meeting. It was further
agreed the City Clerk would prepare a memo on the earlier action taken by
Council regarding reimbursements.
It was noted that a mid-year budget review was scheduled for a Council
Meeting at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, March 18th.
10. STAFF REPORTS
10.1 City Manager
10.2 City Attorney
10.3 City Clerk
10.3a Report on Council Correspondence
The City Clerk corrected the report on Council Correspondence to reflect a
letter received from Mr. Steinberg, not Mrs. Fenwick.
March 4, 1992
8
Concerning this letter, Siegel noted that the stable under discussion
appeared to be operating without a conditional use permit. The
Town Planner noted that the owner of the stable
was working on an application for a conditional use permit and
Casey commented that she knew the stable owner was working
on resolving the problems raised in Mr. Steinberg's letter.
PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To allow a thirty day period for the owner of
the stable to apply for a conditional use permit.
10.3b Notification of Arguments Submitted in Opposition to
Advisory Measure on Fire-Retardant Roofing and
Deadline Established for Submittal of Rebuttals
The City Clerk reported that as of the 5:00 p.m. deadline on March 4th, one
argument had been filed in favor of the advisory measure on
fire-retardant roofing and one argument against. The deadline
for filing a rebuttal was 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 17th.
PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To schedule a Special Meeting for noon on
` Wednesday, March 11th to finalize the rebuttal to the argument
against the advisory ballot measure.
11. COUNCIL-INITIATED ITEMS
11.1 Discussion of Extending Notification Limit from 300'
(Mayor Pro Tem Tryon)
Council discussed the notification process now in place for public hearings. This
process included notifying the neighbors within a 300' radius; posting notices on the
three Town Boards and posting several notices on the property under discussion. It
was noted that while additional notification to neighbors might be very helpful, the
posting on the property was often not useful in that the notices blew away or there
were not appropriate places to post them (i.e. on empty lots).
Dot Schreiner, 14301 Saddle Mountain Drive, noted that the Town had yellow site
signs used for posting on property.
PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To modify the notification process to include
notification of neighbors within a 500' radius; to post on the three Town Boards and
to post one notice on the property under discussion.
March 4, 1992
9
Siegel noted that Carmel had a good example of a post used to hold the public
hearing notices on properties.
11.2 Discussion of Council Policy on Time Limits on Public Testimony
(Mayor Hubbard)
Council discussed the ground rules for giving public testimony at the meetings.
In an effort to keep public hearings from being too long, Hubbard
suggested that the applicant be requested to answer all questions regarding
his or her project at one time rather than individually. It was also noted
that the Town's Code referenced a five minute limit on presentations to
the Council. It was generally agreed that the Mayor was in a position to
conduct the Council Meetings as he deemed appropriate.
11.3 Joint City Council/Planning Commission Meeting
Hubbard raised the issue of a joint meeting and it was agreed that this meeting
would be scheduled for either April 1st at 5:30 p.m. or for April 29th (the
fifth Wednesday of the month) depending on the agenda formulated for
the meeting. The Mayor would decide which date would be best. It was
noted that Planning Commissioner Jones would report these dates to the
Commission.
411/
11.4 Emergency Managers Meeting
Hubbard noted that Fire Chief Landrum was unable to attend the Emergency
Managers Meeting.
11.5 League of California Cities Bulletin -- Sales Tax on Food
Tryon referred to recent articles on sales tax on food in the LOCC Bulletin. She
strongly believed that food should not be taxed.
11.6 Town Party
Siegel commented on the number of guarantors needed to make the Town's
Party scheduled for May 8th a success and noted the Town's financial
responsibility for this event.
11.7 Reagan Library
` March 4, 1992
10
Tryon commented on the Reagan Library, a 153,000 square foot building , which
was an interesting architectural example.
12. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further new or old business to discuss, the City Council
Meeting was adjourned at 10:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Patricia Dowd
City Clerk
The minutes of the March 4, 1992 Regular City Council Meeting were
approved at the April 1, 1992 City Council Meeting.
March 4, 1992
11