Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/19/1991 (2) Minutes of a Regular Meeting June 19, 1991 Town of Los Altos Hills City Council Meeting Wednesday,June 19, 1991, 7:15 P.M. Council Chambers, 26379 Fremont Road 1. CALL TO ORDER,ROLL CALL, AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Siegel called the Regular Meeting of the City Council to order at 7:25 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Town Hall. Present: Mayor Siegel and Councilmembers Casey, Hubbard, Johnson and Tryon. Absent: None Staff: City Manager Les Jones, II; City Attorney Sandy Sloan; Director of Public Works Bill Ekern; Planning Consultant Margaret Netto; and City Clerk Pat Dowd Press: Mary Fortney, Peninsula Times Tribune; Cristal Borlik, Los Altos Town Crier 2. APPOINTMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS 2.1 Presentation of Proclamation to Brennan Lawrence Pang Commending His Receipt of the Eagle Scout Award Mayor Siegel congratulated Brennan Pang on his receipt of the Eagle Scout Award and gave him a proclamation from the Town. 2.2 Re-Organization of Council MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Casey, seconded by Tyron and passed unanimously to appoint Sid Hubbard as Mayor. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Hubbard, seconded by Johnson and passed by the following roll call vote to appoint BarbaraTryon as Mayor Pro Tern. June 19, 1991 1 AYES: Mayor Hubbard and Councilmembers Johnson, Siegel and Tryon NOES: Councilmember Casey Hubbard presented Siegel with a framed picture of the Town's Seal and also stated that an oak tree was going to be planted at Town Hall in appreciation of Councilmember's contributions as Mayor. Council thanked Siegel for his achievements as Mayor. To mention only a few he pulled everyone together, made great progress on the pathways project and provided a more consistent approach to the Town's ordinances. Siegel thanked everyone for their comments and support. 3. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Commissioner Carico reported that in addition to the items on the Consent Calendar from the Planning Commission's 6/12/91 meeting, Lands of Pierce, Mooring and Harrington would be scheduled for public hearings by the Council. No recommendation was made by the Planning Commission regarding the Lands of Mooring request for a site development permit for demolition and reconstruction of an existing residence. Regarding the August schedule for meetings, it was agreed that since Council was not meeting they would receive the information of Planning Commission actions and if they wished to appeal an action they could do so individually. Carico thanked Siegel for his contributions as Mayor and congratulated Hubbard and Tryon. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR Items Removed: 4.1 - 6/5/91 Regular Meeting (Tryon); 4.3c (Siegel) and 4.8 (Tryon) MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Johnson, seconded by Tryon and passed unanimously to approve the balance of the Consent Calendar, specifically: 4.1 Approval of Minutes: June 4,1991 (Adjourned Regular Meeting) June 5, 1991 (Adjourned Regular Meeting) 4.2 Approval of Warrants: $101,737.03 (5/31/91) $ 36,258.09 (6/3/91) 4.3 Consideration of Whether To Concur with or Review the following Planning Commission Actions at Its Meeting on June 12, 1991: 4.3a Lands of Reneau, 13149 Byrd Lane, approved request for a site development permit for a major addition. 411, June 19, 1991 2 'kW 4.3b Lands of Jain, 27860 Fawn Creek Court, approved request for a site development permit for a new residence and tennis court. 4.4 Approving Addendum to Agreement for Contract Maintenance Services, Collection Systems Maintenance Service -- Reso #28-91 4.5 Approval of Landscape Maintenance Agreement, Lands of Finn, Finn Way ' 4.6 Approval of Year-End Budget Adjustments 4.7 Setting the Time Limits and Allowing Extensions Thereto for Environmental Impact Reports and Negative Declarations -- Reso #29-91 4.9 Adopting a Deferred Compensation Plan for the City Manager -- Reso #30-91 4.10 Approving Execution of the Second Amendment to Agreement for Engineering Services between the Town and Wilsey and Ham Reso #31-91 t` Items Removed: 4.1 Approval of Minutes: June 5, 1991 (Regular Meeting) MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Tryon, seconded by Johnson and passed unanimously to approve the minutes of the June 5, 1991 Regular City Council Meeting with the following correction: Page 11, first paragraph, last sentence should read: "Council concurred with the recommendation of the Congestion Management Agency's finance sub-committee that it be $50 rather than $100 per meeting." 4.3c Lands of Owen, 13300 Simon Lane, approved request for a site development permit for a new residence, swimming pool and tennis court Siegel noted that the development on this property was almost to the maximum and also recommended that the following condition be added as was done on another property recently: Grading or construction of the tennis court shall not commence until a letter signed by the future owner is on file requesting such construction. June 19, 1991 3 The Director of Public Works noted that a condition had been added by the Planning fiar Commission regarding the near maximum development of this property. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel, seconded by Johnson and passed unanimously to add the following condition to the site development permit for Lands of Owen on Simon Lane: Grading or construction of the tennis court shall not commence until a letter signed by the future owner is on file requesting such construction. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel, seconded by Johnson and passed unanimously to concur with the Planning Commission's approval of the request for a site development permit for a new residence, swimming pool and tenths court at 13300 Simon Lane, subject to the addition of the following condition of approval to those conditions approved by the Planning Commission: Grading or construction of the tennis court shall not commence until a letter signed by the future owner is on file requesting such construction. 4.8 Request from Los Altos Fire Department for Weed Abatement on Certain Properties Tryon reminded everyone of the July 1, 1985 fire in the Town and the emphasis since then that the Town be as fire safe as possible by July 1st of each year. With the drought situation it was especially important to be aware of fire safety in the Town. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Tryon, seconded by Johnson and passed unanimously to authorize the request from the Los Altos Fire Department for weed abatement on certain properties. 5. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR Barrie Freeman, 26922 Dezahara, stated his concerns about trail safety. In particular he noted the area around Westwind: no maintenance in eighteen months, poison oak overwhelming, tree house still there with debris and fence falling down. He also noted concerns about Altamont and slippery driveways on Natoma. Mr. Freeman commented that he would be glad to assist with a volunteer trail maintenance program. He also reminded everyone that the third annual Romp and Stomp was scheduled for July 21 at Hidden Villa. Council asked the City Manager to provide them with a periodic report on what paths are being worked on. Ruth Buneman, 12655 La Cresta, noted that she was a bicyclist rather than an equestrian but thanked staff for clearing the paths and trails that she used. June 19, 1991 4 David Struthers, 13690 Robleda Road, thanked the Mayor for sending his letter to the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District regarding Neary Quarry. Marjorie Wier, Los Altos, noted that she had been a hiker and horseman in the area for fifteen years and commented on the following areas of concern: Elena above Avila and Page Mill between Three Forks and Paseo de Roble. She also commented on signage and her concerns with invasion of privacy. Ed Emling, 11853 Murietta Lane, reiterated his concerns about slick driveways. His daughter had had an accident in December which he had informed Council about and to date nothing had been done to correct the problem. Triona Watson, 13800 Robleda Road, stated her concerns about slick driveways which included Miranda and Manuella. Dot Schreiner, Chairman - Pathways, Recreation and Parks Committee, requested that anyone who had any concerns about paths go to Town Hall and fill out a service request. Kathy Freeman, 26922 Dezahara, raised the issue of July 4th and fire safety. She hoped the Town was planning to do what they did last year which was to work with the Fire Department and the Sheriff's Department in restricting access to certain areas. It was agreed that this would be done this year. Council took this opportunity to welcome the new City Manager, Les Jones, II to the Town. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6.1 Request for Adoption of a Negative Environmental Declaration for a Three-Lot Subdivision, Lands of Malek, Buena Vista Drive Council had before them the Director of Public Works' staff report which included the recommendation that Council not certify the negative declaration of environmental impact and require an environmental impact report on the Lands of Malek. The issues raised in the staff report included traffic, safety, geology, aesthetics, conservation easements and density of development. Michael McCracken, applicant's attorney, referenced his letter dated 6/19/91 which addressed the issues raised by staff and explained why they believed that an EIR was not necessary and a negative declaration would suffice. For one they were only asking for three density credits when they were allowed four and they also believed that the traffic from a three lot IOW June 19, 1991 5 subdivision could be addressed by conditions from staff. He believed that tear requiring an E1R placed an undue burden on the applicant. Moosa Malek, applicant, noted that he presently lived in the Town across from Westwind Barn and gave background information on the length of time it has taken him to get to this stage of his proposed project. Larry Lihosit, applicant's engineer, stated that he had worked on this project for two years and addressed the issues raised by staff. In part the following statements were made: the project did not pierce the ridgeline; they had done a feasibility study on Central Drive but staff had requested that Central not be used; this piece of property originally had five lots and they were now requesting three; Mr. Malek had met with his immediate neighbors; there was an existing cul-de-sac which the applicant planned to improve; the landslide on Central would have to be improved no matter what development was done; the definition of structure as related to conservation easements was discussed; and they would return land to a natural environment unless fire retardant plants were preferred. Jeff Peterson, Town's engineering consultant, reiterated his concerns about this project. The Fire Marshall had recommended denial of the subdivision and Mr. Peterson had not seen any analysis that the widening of Buena Vista was feasible. There was also a landslide on Mr. Lachenbruch's property and Mr. Malek's property crossed over this; improvements would have to be done on Mr. Lachenbruch's property. Mr. Peterson also noted that his slope measurements do not concur with the applicant's and he questioned the developability of this lot. Art Lachenbruch, 11820 Buena Vista, made the following comments regarding the proposed project: there was no right of way across his property; the right of way on Buena Vista was 40' for about 400' and then it was 25'; the landslide on his property was about 30% and he found it hard to believe that a tractor could get down to repair it; and the drainage issue would have to be addressed. Judy Carico, 25311 O'Keefe, noted that this property had been before the Town approximately three times and the issues addressed had been raised each time. Her recommendation would be for a two lot subdivision. Polly Savoie, 11640 Buena Vista, did not agree with the applicant that this project would not have a negative impact and stated her support for access off Central Drive. Mary Steers, Buena Vista, did not believe it was right for Council to deny this project for years over technicalities. She noted that when she had come in it June 19, 1991 6 for subdivision on her property for seven lots on thirteen acres the air conditions had been completely unreasonable and it had been denied. She also did not believe there was any problem with putting a septic tank in the conservation easement as proposed by the applicant. Mr. Cotton, Town Geologist, concurred with Mr. Lachenbruch that repairing the landslide would be tricky but it could be done. He also could not answer if access off Central would work. Johnson stated that he could not approve with Lot #3; it did not seem to be a developable lot. He also did not support the placement of a septic tank in the conservation easement. Two lots rather than three would mitigate staff's concerns. Tryon also stated concerns about the conservation easement and grading in a landslide. Siegel mentioned that three lots would not work and believed requiring an EIR was just prolonging the process. Hubbard concurred with Siegel. Casey suggested that more information was needed on such issues as the landslide, the slope of Lot #3 and access from Central and she recommending continuing the public hearing. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Johnson, seconded by Tryon and passed by the following roll call vote to not certify the negative dedaration of environmental impact for Lands of Malek on Buena Vista. IOW AYES: Mayor Hubbard and Councilmembers Johnson, Siegel and Tryon NOES: None ABSTAIN: Councilmember Casey MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel, seconded by Johnson and passed by the following roll call vote to deny the request for a three lot subdivision for Lands of Malek on Buena Vista Drive based on three lots not being safe to develop. AYES: Mayor Hubbard and Councilmembers Johnson, Siegel and Tryon NOES: None ABSTAIN: Councilmember Casey Casey stated that she did not believe the information before them was complete. 6.2 Appeal of Planning Commission's Approval of a Request for a Site Development Permit for a New Residence and a Swimming Pool, Lands of Shockley, 27781 Edgerton Road. S June 19, 1991 7 Kenneth Wright, 27791 Edgerton, addressed his concerns about the Shockley project and his reasons for appealing the Planning Commission's approval. He particularly noted water flow onto his property, effluent materials going into the street, unstable soil in the area of the proposed building site, and the potential of a health hazard. Mr. Wright also stated his opinion that the Health Department's report that there was no flow of water onto his property was wrong. The Director of Public Works stated that he had spoken with the Health Department and they did not encounter water and were satisfied that the site was satisfactory for a septic field. Casey commented that she had met with the neighbors and asked for clarification regarding where the trenching had been done and what were aquifers. Mr. Shockley, applicant, explained that he had owned the property since 1984 and many studies had been done on the property since then. Trenches had been dug 15' in the exact location where the septic tank would be placed. William Cotton, Town's Geologist, explained what aquifers were and noted that with a four to five year drought, the information was not particularly reliable. He also noted, in response to Siegel's question that assuming there was water did it affect the design of the house, that it did not. Mark Hazell, applicant's attorney, commented on the litigation involving the previous owners of the Choong property. The tennis court had failed on the Choong's property but the previous owners had taken the money and not done any repairs. There had been a settlement between the Choongs and the Shockleys and as a result of the settlement he believed the geotechnical requirements would be improved. Jean Coombs, noted that in 1982 there had been a landslide and there were underground aquifers on the property. Mrs. Choong, 27769 Edgerton Road, inquired about the accuracy of the report done by PSE Associates for Mr Shockley. She referenced the 1984 landslide and believed the concrete piers on the property should go to 25', not the proposed 15'. She also asked how many test borings were done on the Shockley property and asked why the water sources were not traced. Mr. Choong, 27769 Edgerton Road, referenced a 1974-75 geological report which stated that lots 3 and 4 should not be developed. He also stated his belief June 19, 1991 8 that the only way to solve the problem was to put in a sewer system and would concur with the formation of a sewer assessment district. Gary Parich, PSE Associates, commented that he had twenty years of experience, referenced the different testings that had been done on the property, and noted that the County had done the septic system design. Mr. and Mrs. Lin, 27764 Edgerton Road, referenced their letter dated 6/19/91 which addressed the following issues: soils and slope stability, the site development plan and water drainage. They believed Mr. Shockley was doing just the minimum required and that more specific plans were needed. They also referenced the original site approval in 1973 which noted that no buildings should be constructed in this area and the drainage should be very carefully controlled. The present plans did not address their concerns. They noted that it had not rained for four or five years and there was still water on their property and there was moss. They were not against Mr Shockley developing the property but wanted it to be well done and did not want water coming onto their property. Tryon believed this was an inadequate drainage system for the house and would like to see a drainage system design with rock swale and underground pipe. Siegel suggested requiring conditions 3 and 10 prior to issuing a site development permit. He also asked why this house was being built to maximum allowable development. Johnson noted the neighbors concerns about raw sewage and water runoff and did not believe condition 10 should be added. Mr. Shockley, applicant, stated that the plans were in the preliminary stage and the working plans for the building permit would be more detailed and would address the technical questions. In response to Siegel's question regarding developent, he stated that he would have no objection to it being included in the title that the development was at its maximum. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Tryon, seconded by Johnson and passed by the following roll call vote to continue the public hearing on the appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of a request for a site development permit for a new residence and a swimming pool for Lands of Shockley to the July 17, 1991 Council meeting and to request the applicant to work with the City Engineer on the design for site drainage to meet the goal of reducing the rate of run off and volume of run off associated with the proposed development and on the resolution of the C sewage issue. ` June 19, 1991 9 hew AYES: Mayor Pro Tern Tryon and Councilmembers Casey, Johnson and Siegel NOES: Mayor Hubbard 6.3 Approval of FY 1991-92 Operating and Project Budget -- Reso #_ This item was continued to later in the meeting. 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS This item was moved to later in the meeting. MOTION SECOND AND CARRIED: Moved by Johnson, seconded by Tryon and passed unanimously to go past the 11:30 p.m. hour of adjournment. 8. NEW BUSINESS 8.1 Request for Encroachment Permit for Driveway, Lands of Nissley, 12422 Robleda Road Council had before them the Director of Public Works' staff report which noted kir that the application was to construct a driveway connection from the Nissley property directly onto Elena Road and which included the recommendation that this request be denied. In part the report stated that the access, between 35 and 50 feet from the stop sign at the intersection of Robleda and Elena roads, created a potentially hazardous condition and should not be allowed and that the only movement for which the proposed driveway was functional presently existed within the existing easement. Mr. Nissley, applicant, presented new drawings to the Council and explained that he was asking for a seven foot wide encroachment permit with no paving adjacent to the street. He noted that this was the first part of a two stage process: first an encroachment permit and then an amendment to the final map. He was requesting direct access to the street to be used when it was difficult to get off his property over the easement. Mr. Nissley further stated that he would take all of the liability for the encroachment permit. Max Blasch, previous owner of easement, stated that he had been on that driveway in a two ton truck and had had no problems. He suggested Councilmembers should go to the driveway and see for themselves. bar June 19, 1991 10 Susan Olson, 26020 Elena, commented that she believed it was dangerous to have access on Elena at the proposed point. Mrs. Sun, 12444 Robleda, raised several concerns about the requested encroachment permit including the following: the reason for the encroachment permit was groundless; it endangered public traffic safety; it destroyed existing scenic landscape; it violated a court order; the permit application did not satisfy encroachment permit procedure and was inconsistent with an existing permit. She referred to her June 12th letter to the Town on this subject which included a petition which had been signed by several neighbors against the encroachment permit. Mrs. Sun also objected to Mr. Nissley's last minute presentation of plans. A discussion followed on the width of Mrs Sun's driveway and concerns were expressed as to why driveway appeared to be 9'8" wide and not the 12' width approved by Council. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel, seconded by Tryon and passed unanimously to continue Mr. Nissley's request for an encroachment permit to the next Council meeting and to investigate why the Sun's driveway was not the approved 12' width. 8.2 Resolution Granting Extension for Completion and Certification of EIR for Lands of Eshner MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel, seconded by Tryon and passed unanimously to adopt Resolution #32-91 extending the one year time limit for preparation and certification of an EIR for Lands of Eshner. 8.3 Request for Annexation of Lands of Anderson, 25225 La Loma Drive Mayor Hubbard stepped down from consideration of this item as he was a neighbor. Council had before them the Planning Consultant's staff report which included the recommendation that Council request annexation of the Anderson property and other properties along La Loma Drive prior to development. Mr. Anderson, 25225 La Loma Drive, stated that he and his wife did not want to annex to the Town nor did their neighbors. In addition to it not being their preference to annex, it would cause them severe delays in their building timetable with the County. kir June 19, 1991 11 Jim Caldwell, Mr. Anderson's architect, noted that he had met with the Town's planning consultant and their project was in conformance with the Town's codes. In addition they had relocated the house to meet the setback requirements of the Town. Siegel and Tryon supported annexing this property as the County encouraged city policies of annexing pockets of land. Siegel particularly emphasized that these residents used Town services such as Sheriff's Department and thus should be a part of the Town. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel, seconded by Tryon and passed by the following roll call vote to request the County to issue building permits to Mr. Anderson when the Town has received a letter from Mr. Anderson stating that he intends to annex to the Town before January 1, 1993. AYES: Councilmembers Siegel and Tryon NOES: Councilmember Casey ABSTAIN: Councilmember Johnson 8.5 Approval of FY 1991-92 Operating and Project Budget -- Reso # Triona Watson, Los Altos Hills Horsemen? Association, presented a proposal to 1kt resurface the Los Altos Hills Town Ring and asked that $20,000 for this project be induded in the 1991-92 budget. She noted that their group was limited financially and their fundraising was primarily done through shows at the ring which were limited if the ring was not in good condition. Siegel noted that there had been no recomendation on this proposal made by the Pathways, Recreation and Parks Committee. He also noted that an arrangement similar to the one between the Town and the Little League could be worked on between the Town and the Horsemens' Association, with the latter group providing matching funds. Siegel suggested continuing this request for a recommendation from the committee and also commented to Ms. Watson that funds could be transferred at a later date. PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To continue the request from the Horsemens' Association for Town funding for the resurfacing of the Town Ring pending a recommendation from the Pathways, Recreation and Parks Committee. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel, seconded by Johnson and passed by the following roll call vote to approve a 5% "pass through" charge, effective July 1, 1991, to reimburse the attorney, consulting engineer, consulting planner and consulting geologist. June 19, 1991 12 AYES: Mayor Hubbard and Councilmembers Johnson, Siegel and Tryon NOES: Councilmember Casey MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Tryon, seconded by Johnson and passed by the following roll call vote to adopt Resolution #33-91 adopting the budget for fiscal year 1991-92. AYES: Mayor Hubbard and Councilmembers Johnson, Siegel and Tryon NOES: Councilmember Casey Casey stated that she voted against adopting the budget because she has a philosophical difference with the way the fees in the budget are determined. Councilmember Casey left the meeting at 1:20 a.m. 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: (continued from earlier in the meeting) 9.1 Ordinance Amending Chapter 2 (Site Development) of Title 10 (Zoning and Site Development) to Clarify Site Development Review of Residences (SECOND READING) MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Tryon, seconded by Johnson and passed unanimously by all members present to waive further reading of ordinance. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Johnson, seconded by Tryon and passed unanimously by all members present to adopt Ordinance #346 amending Chapter 2 (Site Development) of Title 10 (Zoning and Site Development) to clarify site development review of residences. 9.2 Urgency Item — Ordinance amending Chapter 2 of Title 10 to Clarify Site Development Review of Residences Council discussed the need to prevent uses that were in conflict with Ordinance #346 before it became effective and the need to protect the public health, safety and welfare. Therefore, consideration was given to adoption of an urgency ordinance so that no dwelling uses could be commenced without a site development permit. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Tryon, seconded by Siegel and passed unanimously by all members present to add adoption of an urgency ordinance amending Chapter 2 of Title 10 to clarify site development review of residences as an urgency item in that this matter came up after the Council's agenda was prepared. hir June 19, 1991 13 MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel, seconded by Hubbard and passed unanimously by all members present to waive further reading and to adopt Ordinance #347 an an urgency interim ordinance amending Chapter 2 (Site Development) of Title 10 (Zoning and Site Development) with regard to site development review of residences. 9.3 Request from the Joint Committee on the Future of Moffett Field for Support of the Plan "Federal Operation of Moffett Field" MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel, seconded by Tryon and passsed unanimously by all members present to support the Joint Committee on the Future of Moffett Field's proposed reuse plan entitled, "Federal Operation of Moffett Field". 10. REPORTS FROM COMMI t 1 EES, SUB-COMMITTEES, AND COUNCILMEMBERS ON OUTSIDE AGENCIES 10.1 Pathways, Recreation and Parks Committee: Review Detailed Mapping Project. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Tryon, seconded by Hubbard and passed unanimously by all members present to approve the Pathways Mapping Project for Areas P, L, Q and M as follows and a correction to Area J. Area J -- Sign and maintain off road path off bulb of Brendel to Vista Serena - bulb off Vista signed on Map Q Area P-- Off-Road Paths: 1) Francemont to Rhus Ridge, sign at both ends; 2) Padre Court to Moody- sign at both ends; 3) 25525 Altamont to Moody - sign at both ends; 4) 12020 Greenhills to Altamont, sign at both ends; 5) between 25500 and 25490 Crescent Lane to Foothill College - sign at both ends; and 6) end of Bassett Lane to Rhus Ridge - sign at both ends. Area L — Off-Road Paths: 1) Bulb off Deersprings to Julietta - sign at both ends. Area Q — Off-Road Paths: 1) Freeway path at end of O'Keefe to Robleda - sign on O'Keefe; 2) Bulb off La Rena to Visa Serena - sign at both ends; and 3) Vista Serena to Brendel - sign at both ends (Brendel is on Map J). Area M -- There are no off road paths. they 10.2 Roads and Drainage Committee: Annual Report ~ June 19, 1991 14 Council thanked the Committee for its report and it was agreed that Siegel would talk to the Chairman of the Roads and Drainage Committee about whether there was a need for this committee to meet regularly, etc. 11. STAFF REPORTS 11.1 City Manager 11.2 City Attorney 11.3 City Clerk 11.3a Report on Council Correspondence dated June 14, 1991 12. COUNCIL-INITIATED ITEMS 12.1 Artemas Ginzton Path Council reminded everyone that July 13th was the date for the dedication of the Artemas Ginzton Path. Anyone interested could call Town Hall for details. 13. ADJOURNMENT There being no further new or old business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 1:35 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Patricia Dowd,City Clerk The minutes of the June 19, 1991 Regular Meeting were approved at the July 3, 1991 Regular Meeting of the City Council. June 19, 1991 15