Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/16/1990 (2) `. Minutes of a Regular Meeting Town of Los Altos Hills City Council Meeting Wednesday, May 16 , 1990, 7:15 P.M. Council Chambers, 26379 Fremont Road Cassettes 10-90, 11-90 and 12-90 (both sides) Mayor Casey called the Regular Meeting of the City Council to order at 7:15 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Town Hall. 1. CALL TO ORDER,ROLL CALL,AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Present: Mayor Casey and Councilmembers Johnson, Siegel, Tryon and van Tamelen Absent: None Staff: City Manager Thomas Frutchey; City Attorney Sandy Sloan; Director of Public Works Bill Ekern; Planning Director Ann Jamison; and City Clerk Pat Dowd Press: Don Brignolo, San Jose Mercury; Christine Kern, Los Altos Town Crier 2. APPOINTMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Tryon, seconded by Johnson and passed unanimously to move Item 8.4 forward to this point in the agenda. Fire Chief Doug Dawson introduced Captain Jack Pette who would be making a presentation to the Council. Captain Jack Pette commented on this being the fourth year of a drought with high winds and high temperatures making for a very dry and dangerous fire season. They had a list of the vacant properties in Town and the owners had been notified to weed abate their properties. In line with this a neighborhood complaint system was also in place with the understanding that complaints could be anonymous. He noted that the emphasis was being placed on dead trees. They were increasing their in-house training May 16, 1990 1 hi, and a Strike Team Effort was scheduled for May 22-23, 1990 and the neighbors had been notified. The hazardous plan was in place and they were emphasizing public education such as the article in the May 16, 1990 Town Crier. Captain Petty commented that they were working on signs warning people of the fire hazards which would be put at the entrances to the Town. He also stated that they were embarking on a campaign against any types of fireworks this July 4th and they would enforce this along with the Sheriff's Department. Tryon thanked Captain Petty for his presentation and suggested that an article be put in the next Town Newsletter, a report on the proposed signs be on the next agenda and a proclamation be prepared. Mrs. Betsy Bertram, 11854 Page Mill Road, noted that their area had a beautiful view and was a very popular spot on July 4th. She was concerned about the fire hazards this year and asked if no parking signs could be placed to reduce the danger. Mayor Casey suggested that Mrs. Bertram work with staff on this request and the matter be brought back at the next meeting. Captain Petty commented that they could identify areas of serious concern and put up signs, cones, etc. and work with the Sheriffs Department on enforcement. 3. REPORT FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION Planning Commissioner Edward Emling reviewed the summary of the May 9th meeting which noted the following actions: Lands of Ratnam, approval of site development permit; Lands of Bateman, request for variances to the fence height/setback requirements of the Zoning Code - continued by applicant; Lands of Yanez, request for variance denied; Lands of Quarry Hills - discussion of issues related to the lake; and introduction of new City Attorney, Sandy Sloan. Councilmembers discussed the Lands of Ratnam and noted the sensitivity of the area of Middle Fork Lane. It was further noted that when the tentative map for the Lands of Del Monte at Three Forks Lane was approved in May 1987 the motion was also approved to request special sensitivity to the character of this neighborhood when reviewing proposed plans and/or projects. Councilmembers inquired about concerns raised at the Planning Commission Meeting, comments from neighbors, etc. and suggested appealing the matter so they could hold a public hearing on this subject. It IOW May 16, 1990 2 iiir was noted, however, that this action to appeal did not infer opposition to the project; Council simply wished to address the matter themselves and hear the input at a hearing. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel, seconded by Tryon and passed unanimously to appeal the Planning Commission's decision regarding a site development permit for Lands of Ratnam in order that that they could hear the public hearing on the application. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR Item Removed: 4.1 - 5/2/90 Regular Meeting (City Clerk) MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by van Tamelen, seconded by Tryon and passed unanimously to approve the balance of the Consent Calendar, specifically: 4.1 Approval of Minutes: April 18, 1990 (Regular Meeting) April 30, 1990 (Adjourned Regular Meeting) May 2, 1990 (Adjourned Regular Meeting) 4.2 Approval of Warrants: $159,233.16 (April 30, 1990) 4.3 Proclamation: Honoring the 44th Anniversary of the Founding of the Italian Republic 4.4. Proclamation: Declaring May 20, 1990 as "Peace Day" and May, 1990- as "Month of Peace" 4.5 Proclamation: Declaring May, 1990 as "Foster Care Awareness Month" and May 20-26, 1990 as "Santa Clara County Foster Parent Appreciation Week" 4.6 Request for Site Development Permit Extension- Lot 26, Tract 4401, Pink Horse Ranch - Lands of Hansen 4.7 Setting the Time and Place of a Public Hearing to Consider the Adoption of a Town Budget and Appropriations Limit for the Fiscal Year 1990-91 May 16, 1990 3 IIlir 4.8. Acceptance of Improvements, Frampton Court -- Reso #24-90 4.9 Sewer Reimbursement Agreement with Charvez International -- Reso #25-90 4.10 Request for Reimbursement Agreement, Gerard and Lambert, Inc., Reso #26-90 4.11 Appropriation of $75,000 from the Storm Drainage Fund for Lands of Corduan, Reduction of General Fund Appropriations by $65,000, and Call for Bids Item Removed: 4.1 - May 2, 1990 Regular Meeting MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Tryon, seconded by Johnson and passed unanimously to approve the minutes of the May 2, 1990 Regular Meeting with the following corrections: page I, second paragraph, add the following next to last sentence: "Mayor Casey noted that Thomas Pamilla, Executive Director of the L Community Services Agency, would be receiving the Service to Mankind Award the �r next day and Council concurred with sending Mr. Pamilla a certificate of appreciation for this honor; page 3, Item 4.1 insert the introductory comments from the tape for the February 21, 1990 minutes; and page 6, insert the following sentence at the beginning of the page: "Tryon asked that a special statement, proclamation or something be agendized declaring an extreme fire danger this year." 5. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR: Mr. Steve Gaither, 24838 Moody Road, raised the issue of granting an easement to Purissima Hills County Water District which had been continued at the last meeting. He noted that continuance of this issue was delaying his subdivision. Recently he had attended a meeting with Bill McCann and the City Manager to try to work out an alternative benefit package to the one which had been turned down by the Water District Board. It appeared they had reached consensus in their meeting that the Water District would pay$1,000 to the Town and there would be a free water drop with a meter. Mr. Gaither asked that Council concur with the staff working with the Water District to present this new package to the Water District Board. Council concurred. Mr. Hal Reiser, 27660 Red Rock Road, stated his concern about the recent widening of Central Drive by the Town. He noted the increase in traffic and trash and believed it May 16, 1990 4 was wrong to open the road up and asked that this matter be agendized for the next meeting. The Director of Public Works noted that Central Drive had actually been opened up to encourage use of Byrne Preserve. It had been four years since it had been cleared and the road itself had not been widened but the path had been cleared. Mrs. Betsy Bertram, 11854 Page Mill Road, commented on the great article in the Town Crier on the Los Altos Main Street Singers. She noted that they would soon be making their final performance of the season and asked that the Council issue a proclamation and certificate of appreciation. Council concurred. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6.1 Universal Refuse Collection, Defining Dumping, and Amending Refuse Rates for Regular Collection and Debris Boxes The City Manager referred to his 5/16/90 staff report and the new rate structure being presented at this meeting for Council's consideration. He noted several options for 4 Council to consider: 1) services could continue as they were now; 2) universal service �/ could be required for recycling and garbage; or 3) universal service for recycling with options that residents could request an exception from the City Manager for garbage pickup. The universal base rate would cover recycling, the clean-up days and the household hazardous waste pickups. The universal garbage pick-up would be required unless the resident has a personal program which was equal or better than the Town's. The proposed monthly total rates for refuse and recycling, with universal recycling service for the first distance of road to 100 (distance can is from public street): no garbage -$7.95; 1 can weekly- $15.40; 2 cans weekly-$20.48; 3 cans weekly-$25.70; and 4 cans weekly $31.06. Recyclables would be picked up twice a month and residences would be provided with calendars of these dates. Presently the Planning Commission was working on the selection of sites for yard waste. Letters had been sent to all those currently not subscribing to garbage service advising them of this hearing and the proposed program. After getting several of these back as undeliverable, it appeared that a more correct percentage of those not subscribing to garbage service was 4%. If Council approved the recycling program with the exception option, the garbage company would send letters to those not subscribing explaining to them the new program and the exception option. Mrs. Betsy Bertram, 11854 Page Mill Road, asked what it would cost for recycling and May 16, 1990 5 was informed that the base charge would be $7.95 per month which would include recycling, the clean-up days and the household hazardous waste pickups. Mrs. Bertram also asked if people would have choices, i.e. recycling, no garbage pickup? Mr. Les Earnest, 12769 Dianne Drive, commented that the public should be made aware of "rubbish", items that were not recyclable but also were not garbage. He also inquired about how the garbage company would handle the problem of alledgedly uninhabited houses. Mr. Scott Overstreet, 26200 Encinal Court, stated that he was a non-subscriber for garbage service and explained how he dealt with his garbage which included chipping and composting and his success at recycling. He thought the proposal before Council sounded like a good system but he would not want to pay for garbage service that he did not use. Mr. Don Harriman, 26970 Elena, also stated that he currently did not have garbage service and asked how he could get an exception. While he believed this was a good program, he believed he should have a choice as to what services he wanted to have. Dr. Howard Martin, 11666 Dawson, stated that he thought everyone should be congratulated for this program. It was affordable and a giant step toward solving a serious problem. Mr. Hal Reiser, 27660 Red Rock, also noted that he did not have garbage service but was in favor of a mandatory recyling program. Mrs. Howard Martin, 11666 Dawson, commented on the difficulty of ascertaining who did not use the quarterly clean-up days. Mr. Vince Majori, Mountain View, represented an independent recyling company and explained how his pilot project with free enterprise could work in the Town. They would pick up the recyclables and pay for them as they were picked up. They then take the goods to a broker. In his opinion it was double taxation to charge the residents for the privilege of recycling. Siegel responded that by State Law the Town had to make serious reductions and he did not believe this would work unless the program were mandatory. Therefore, he noted to Mr. Majori that he did not think his program would work in the Town. Siegel further noted that this did not stop people for turning in their recyclables for money if they wanted to. May 16, 1990 6 4►r John Angin, General Manager - Los Altos Garbage Company, believed that the rate structure presented to Council tonight was an excellent option and the entire proposed program was exceptionally good. In response to inquiries, Mr. Angin stated that more recycling cans could be requested, other cans could be used and special pickups could be requested. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Tryon, seconded by Johnson and passed unanimously to adopt Resolution #27-90 approving and authorizing execution of seventh addendum to agreement between the Town and the Los Altos Garbage Company, including universal recycling and garbage with the exception clause available for garbage service. It was further noted that a letter would be sent to all non- subscribers explaining the program and the exception option. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel, seconded by Casey and passed unanimously to direct the City Attorney to prepare an urgency ordinance adopting a universal recycling and garbage program with an exception clause concerning the garbage service. (kW Council made several suggestions regarding areas in which the Town could improve recycling: use of recycled paper especially for things like the newsletter; copying on both sides and if necessary perhaps purchasing a new copier which could do this; providing mesh bags for grocery shopping for the residents; and continuing with the community program of using the blue bags for trash pickup as were used on Earth Day. 6.2 Request for Amendment of the Conditions of Approval for the Tentative Map for Lands of Nelson, 13870 La Paloma Drive Council made the following disclosures: van Tamelen looked at lot; Johnson had nothing to report; Casey looked at the lot and had nothing to report; Tryon and Siegel talked to the applicant about the project. Council had before them a request from the applicant, Bob Owen, for realignment of the driveway so that it would be adjacent to the north property line for most of its length and a request for modification of the 22-foot height limit imposed on the property by the Council to allow 23 feet. Bob Owen, applicant, explained the unusual site and noted that they were trying to preserve the trees. The driveway was now limiting the siting. He believed they were May 16, 1990 7 `. mitigating the driveway with the modification and concurred with the staff recommendation that the setback from LaPaloma be increased to 80 feet. Mr. Owen stated that a u-shaped house was being designed and they were trying to address the concerns of the neighbors. He further commented that they were also requesting a waiver of fees as this amendment went back to the original proposal. van Tamelen commented that it appeared the modification would violate the Town's ordinances concerning grading within 10 feet of the property line. However, staff noted and Bob Owen concurred that the grading could be done without violating the Town's ordinances. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Tryon, seconded by Johnson and passed unanimously to amend the conditions of approval for the tentative map for Lands of Nelson to allow for modification of condition 1 requiring maintanence of the existing curvalinear driveway, to allow a straighter although slightly curved driveway and to allow for modification of condition 17 limiting the structure height to 22 feet, to allow for a single story house not to exceed 23' with the mitigating measure that development on this parcel shall be setback 80 feet from the right-of-way of LaPaloma to protect the existing pine cluster at the front of the property. 6.3 Code Amendments to Allow Trailer Coaches as Accessory Structures During Construction of a Primary Residence PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To continue this item to the June 6, 1990 Council Meeting. 6.4 Proposed Levying of Charges and Fees for Environmental Monitoring PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To continue this item to the June 6, 1990 Council Meeting. 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 7.1 Lands of Quarry Hills, Stonebrook Drive, Discussion of Issues Related to the Proposed Lake Council had before them the Director of Public Works staff report dated 5/16/90 on the water issues of quarry hills. The report included a discussion of the two components to the water issues of this project: Hale Creek and the proposed lake. Regarding the lake, the report addressed filling, maintenance and access. Regarding Hale Creek, the flow, 7r setbacks and open versus closed channels were discussed. In summary, the report May 16, 1990 8 noted that the critical issues relating to water and the subdivision were the maintenance and monitoring of the water quality and the effectiveness of the environmental mitigation measures. Tryon asked for a clarification of what non-beneficial uses regarding the lake meant and who determined what they were. The Director of Public Works responded that the State Water Resources Board made these decisions. Tryon asked for a copy of the State Regulations and Siegel stated that a definitive legal answer was needed. Siegel asked if the State Water Resources Board were to grant Mr. Vidovich's request for diversion would the Town under the subdivision conditions have any right to change this such as stating only purchased water put down Hale Creek. This was a question for the attorney to address. Siegel also asked if the applicant had considered putting in a smaller lake. Seigel also stated that the lake was a reality because of the subdivision, not the redamation plan and it was going to take a long time for the lake to be in place. Siegel believed that Mr. Vidovich should be reponsible for the lake until it was completed; it should not be the responsibility of the owners of the homes. Transfer of ownership should not be completed until the lake was in. van Tamelen questioned how changes to the lake such as slope changes affected the maintenance plan. She was also concerned about access to the lake and the fence issue. She did not know how children were going to be kept out of the area. Siegel commented on the "dosed development" option and noted that the public should not be allowed in the area as they were not paying for it, the homeowners were. Dr. Howard Martin, 11666 Dawson, presented a handout to the Council on the issue of Hale Creek. He particularly addressed the issue of the bypass system and stated in his report that ". . . the way the pipes had been placed for this "bypass" and the way the surface roads, etc. had been modified in the last two years, it was virtually impossible for water to enter those pipes . . . .and several of the pipe segments were so uptilted that water would have to flow uphill to traverse the proposed flow line." Dr. Martin also commented on the problem of evaporation and noted that filling the lake and keeping it filled were two different subjects. For reclaimed water there were no restrictions but for pumped water, there may be some restrictions for "beneficial uses". Ms. Libby Lucas, Los Altos, noted that Albert Henley, former Los Altos Hills Councilmember, was an expert on the issue of "beneficial uses". She commented on Hale Creek and noted that the issue of unnecessary grading should be looked at very 4 carefully. C May 16, 1990 9 John Vidovich, applicant, noted that he has an approved reclamation plan which includes the lake but the diversion hearing has been delayed until the State is certain the environmental document is unchallengable. In response to the inquiry about a smaller lake, Mr. Vidovich noted that if Council granted him a permit to quarry the upper lands he could because he would need a larger source of dirt. He also noted that the lake exists even now during the drought. Mr. Vidovich further stated that he would work to put the lake in as soon as possible particularly for financial reasons; he would sell the lots for much more money if a lake was in place. 7.2 Expiration and Discontinuance of Conditional Development Permits, Conditional Use Permits and Variances (SECOND READING) MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by van Tamelen, seconded by Tryon and passed unanimously to waive further reading of ordinance. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by van Tamelen, seconded by Casey and passed unanimously to adopt Ordinance #333 amending Title 11 of Title 10 by adding a section regarding expiration of conditional use permits, conditional development permits, and variances. 7.3 Cable Television: Execution of Lease for Headend Site, Construction Schedule and Decision Regarding Direct Solicitation Lyn Simpson, Sun Country Cable, introduced Brett Fontes their technical manager and Kathy Brinkman their customer service administrator. Ms. Simpson commented that they were running into some problems with people complaining about them crossing over their easements. However, it was pointed out that the Cable Act allowed them to do this. Kathy Brinkman, Sun Country Cable, presented to Council a map of the Town which showed the three phases of construction of cable. PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To keep a copy of the Master Plan for Cable TV at Town Hall for residents' reference with a contact number for them to call at Sun Country for information. It was further noted that this map would be updated every couple of weeks by Sun Country. Lyn Simpson, Sun Country Cable, explained the benefit to them of doing direct sales. They would like to use door hangers which would include a toll free number to call if May 16, 1990 10 the person did not want Sun Country to come by. One of the main reasons for wanting to do this is that they would be providing the option of custom installations. The Town would be advised of the activities and the location of the people working for Sun Country. They would work only during daylight hours, using identification approved by the Town. Siegel suggested they do this on a trial basis in a small portion of Town to see how it works. If the Town receives a lot a negative phone calls, it could be reconsidered. Mr. Phil Dauber, 27930 Roble Alto, stated that Sun Country was a commercial enterprise. Why not let Time Magazine solicit in the Town? He objected to Sun Country getting any special treatment. Mrs. Sharyn Adkisson, 27673 Lupine, inquired about the timetable for cabling her street as well as Via Felice. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel, seconded by Casey and passed unanimously to allow Sun Country Cable to place door hangers on a limited number of residences until September 1, 1990 and to interpret previous consent of the owners as passive consent. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Johnson, seconded by Tryon and passed unanimously to go past the 11:30 p.m. hour of adjournment. 8. NEW BUSINESS 8.1 Request from Foothill College for a Contribution of $150,000 for Renovation of the Griffin House Rosemary Meyerott, Town Historian, reported that the Environmental Impact Report was being done on the Griffin House and she had taken some people through the house who expressed an interest in moving it. No more meetings were scheduled at this time of the committee on the Griffin House. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Casey, seconded by Johnson and passed unanimously to ask that the Town be kept informed of any actions regarding the Griffin House, to encourage ongoing consultation and to advise the College that the Town is unable at this time to provide the financial support they have requested. May 16, 1990 11 8.2 Request for Town to Co-Sponsor Romp and Stomp Day -- June 22, 1990 The City Manger's staff report dated 5/16/90 included the request from Responsible Organized Mountain Pedelers and the Los Altos Hills Horsemens' Association that, in addition to lending the Town's name to this event, the Town either contribute the cost of the food for the barbeque (about $500) or insure the event under the Town's overall insurance policy. Mr. Bob Stutz, President - Horsemens' Association - explained this event had been held for the first time last year and had been quite successful. While they would certainly appreciate support from the Town, he certainly understood why the Town at this time would be unable to provide financial support. Mr. Philip Dauber, Chairman - Finance Committee, did not believe this was an appropriate use of Town funds. Councilmembers commented that this was a wonderful event but noted support could be considered precedent setting and took no action on the request. 8.3 Adoption of Final Proposal for a Congestion Management Planning Agency for Santa Clara County Mr. Art Takahara, Vice-Mayor - Mountain View, commented that he understood Morgan Hill and Gilroy had not voted, but the other cities in the County seemed to be moving ahead. Mountain View planned to adopt the resolution. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel, seconded by Casey and passed unanimously to endorse the concept of a resolution regarding the formation of a congestion management planning agency for Santa Clara County. 8.4 Presentation by Fire District Personnel Concerning Possible Fire Dangers this Coming Summer and a Discussion by the Council of Alternative Steps that Could Be Taken This item was discussed earlier in the meeting 8.5 Upcoming Vacancies - City Selection Committee Appointments L May 16, 1990 12 MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Casey, seconded by Tryon and passed unanimously to recommend appointment of Councilmember Johnson to the City Selection Committee. 9. REPORTS FROM COMMItIlES AND SUB-COMMITTEES 10. STAFF REPORTS 10.1 City Manager 10.1.1 Support of Sher Bill - AB 2766 MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Seigel, seconded by Casey and passed unanimously to support the recommendation that the Santa Clara County Cities Association oppose AB 2766 unless it is amended so that local governments in the BAAQMD directly receive 40% of the vehicle registration surcharge revenues in the same way that local governments in the SCAQMD receive revenues. 10.2 City Attorney van Tamelen asked the City Attorney if, as a result of the de la Raza Court Ruling, would the Town's zoning be in jeopardy with annexation of the upper Neary Quarry lands. The City Attorney responded that the Town's zoning would not be in jeopardy. 10.3 City Clerk 10.3.1 Report on Council Correspondence dated 5/11/90 van Tamelen asked if the letters were getting answered; was there a policy for Council correspondence. Mayor Casey commented that generally she called those writing letters directly. It was suggested that adoption of a policy regarding responses to Council correspondence be agendized. 11. COUNCIL-INITIATED ITEMS 11.1 Requests from MTC for Support of Tasman Corridor Light Rail Project and from Mountain View for Support of Light Rail from Tasman to g Mountain View (Mayor Casey) May 16, 1990 13 Art Takahara, Vice Mayor of Mountain View, explained to the Council the potential of light rail coming to Mountain View and invited any of the Councilmembers to join their committee on this issue. He noted that Mountain View was heavily involved in transportation and this would be a major link to the North County. He commented on cost, ridership, planned stops serving a mixture of commerical, residential and industrial uses and the increased easy access to the downtown area. Mr. Takahara also commented on the simplicity of the construction. The cost per mile was substantially lower than that in Sunnyvale and the Mountain View alignment did not require any major bridges or tunnels. Mr. Takahara thanked the Council for affording them the opportunity to make their presentation and requested their support. Mr. Ken Alsman, Economic Development Manager, presented slides which detailed the planned stops of the light rail and emphasized the importance of this safe and convenient method of transportation. PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To indicate support for the Light Rail from Tasman to Mountain View but to defer adoption of resolution to next meeting to give Sunnvyale the opportunity to make a presentation to the Council if they wished. 11.2 Potential Increase in Front Yard Setbacks for Larger Homes (Councilmember Tryon) Tryon commented that she would like this matter to go to the Planning Commission and it was agreed by the Council that this issue would be added to the work program for the Planning Commission. 11.3 Possible Declaration of Public Nuisance, Lands of Brown, 26993 Beaver Lane (Councilmember van Tamelen) van Tamelen raised concerns about the Brown property on Beaver Lane. Apparently the house was in a state of disrepair and the neighbors were concerned about the unkept appearance of the property. It was agreed that the City Manager would look into the situation and report back to the Council. 11.4 Undergrounding of Utilities Tryon emphasized that undergrounding of utilities should be encouraged by the Town. She also commented that perhaps Environmental Design and Protection Committee could work with residents of the affected areas. May 16, 1990 14 11.5 Page Mill and Moody Roads Tryon stated her concerns about the area of Page Mill and Moody with the motorists and the cyclists. She suggested that this matter be sent to the Safety Committee for comment. 11.6 Purissima Hills Water District Board Tryon noted that Grover Cox had recently passed away. Mr. Cox had been a member of the Purissima Hills Water District Board. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Casey, seconded by Tryon and passed unanimously to recommend Councilmember Johnson for appointment to the Purissima Hills Water District to fill the unexpired term of Mr. Cox. 12. ADJOURNMENT There being no further new or old business to discuss, the City Council adjourned at 12:15 a.m. in memory of Mr. Grover Cox. Respectfully submitted, Patricia Dowd, City Clerk thir May 16, 1990 15