HomeMy WebLinkAbout1476 Should be#1476 (see attached Minutes)
Changed 12/10/15
RESOLUTION NO. 1477
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF THE TOWN OF
LOS ALTOS HILLS AND JEROME D. AND TAMARA ANN TOSSY
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of the Town of Los
Altos Hills, County of Santa Clara, State of California, that
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of the Town of Los Altos
Hills has read and considered that certain Agreement between the City
of the Town of Los Altos Hills and Jerome D. and Tamara Ann Tossy, his
wife, providing for the dedication of certain easements and for the
installation of a pathway as more particularly described therein,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS FOUND, ORDERED AND DETERMINED as follows :
1. Public interest and convenience require the entering into of
the above-described Agreement, and the City of the Town of Los Altos
Hills hereby approves this Agreement. •
2.
The City of the Town of Los Altos Hills shall enter into, and
the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of the Town of Los Altos Hills be,
and they and each of them hereby is authorized and directed on behalf
of said City, respectively, to execute and attest an Agreement between
the City of the Town of Los Altos Hills and Jerome D. and Tamara Ann Tossy.
REGULARLY passed and adopted this 18th day of August, 1982.
,
ATTEST: Mayor
City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - gust 18, 1982
E. SPECIAL ORDERS: Item 2 - Reconsideration of Resolution #1471 (continued) :
lbw PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To direct the City Manager to recommend an appropriate
pro-rata charge for the JPA at the next meeting.
3. Request for Parcel Map Approval, LANDS OF ASSY, File SA #5-81
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: MovedAby- Hillestad, seconded by Allison and passed
unanimously to adopt Resolution.#14Mpproving parcel map and accepting easements,
Lands of Tossy
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Allison, seconded by Proft and passed
unanimously to adopt Resolution`#�1�4'76 roving and authorizing execution of an
agreement between the City of the Town of Los Altos Hills and Jerome D. and Tamara
Ann Tossy
4. Public Hearing:
a) Williamson Act Contract - Petition requesting cancellation of Kinkead
Williamson Act Contract - (continued from 7/21/82 Council meeting and
continued for sixty days at request of applicant)
MOTION SECONDED AND CARR►H ): Moved by Allison, seconded by Hillestad and passed
unanimously to continue Kinkead petition for cancellation of Williamson Act
Contract for sixty days.
5. Consideration of appeal of Site Develoirent Permit - Lands of Cooper , lot 10 -
Matadero Creek Subdivision
Frank Saul, 27977 Via Ventana, referred to his letter, to the Council dated 8/18/82.
In his opinion the approval of this site development permit was not in keeping with
the preservation of the rural standards of the Town and would destroy the Town's
ability to regulate site development within reasonable bounds on steep lots. Mr.
Saul further questioned Council's decision to hear his appeal rather than having
it referred back to the Planning Catmission for consideration.
The City Planner commented on his staff report dated 8/13/82 noting in part that
the appeal appeared to he mainly pointed at the house instead of the grading and
drainage. Be further noted that the design of the structure was not part of the
site development permit. A slide presentation was given which showed examples of
grading throughout the Town.
Mr. Cooper, owner of Lot 10 - Matadero Creek Subdivision, diagramed for Council
his plans for the house. Mr. Cooper emphasized landscaping, his attempt to preser%
the contours of the site, the visibility flan the road, his concern for the
neighbors and drainage. Mr. Cooper noted that at the Site Development meeting
the neighbors were present and were pleased with the plans l-e presented.
Council discussed the Site Development process in general and the appeal concerninc
Tot 10 in particular. Proft requested clarification fan the City Planner regardi3
the type of foundation approved for Lot 10. van Tamelen noted that the Architectu)
Carrrittee established in the CC&Rs was not in effect nor had two Planning Cammissic
lbw been present at the Site Development meeting.
-5-