01/03/1973 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY COUNCIL TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING January 3, 19Z3 REEL 49 Side 2 Track 2 440 -End REEL 50 Side 1 Track 1 00-103 Mayor Leslie Helgesson called the Regular Meeting of the City Council of the Town of Ins Altos Hills to order at 7:47 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Town Hall, 26379 Fremont Road, Los Altos Hills, California with the fsllowing members answering roll call: Present: Councilman Davey, Kubby, Miller, Grabowski and Mayor Helgesson. PLANNING COMMISSICH REPRESENTATIVE: Commissioner Weiabart Mayor Helgesson introduced and welcomed the new City Manager, Mr. Bruce Lawson. APPROVAL OF MIBUTES: July 10, 1972 July 24, 1972 August 3, 1972 August 7, 1972 August 8, 1972 December 6, 1972 MOTION, SECONDED AND CARRIED: Councilman Kubby moved, secondcd by Grabowski and carried unanimously to coniine tnis item to the next Council meeting. COMMUNICATIONS: 1. Letter from Artemas A. Gimton regarding increased cost of agendas and minutes. The Staff was asked to reply. 2. The League of California Cities sent their Legislative Bulletin, dated December 7,1972. 3. Letter from the Federated Woman's Club of Los Altos which expressed their support for the Health Abuse Program. 4. Letter from J.J. Lynch of Wilson, Jones, Morton & Lynch regarding S.A.D. No. 9 Suit enclosing (1) an endorsed filed copy of Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; (2) an endorsed filed copy of the Judgment entered in the proceeding; and (3) a Notice of Entry of Judgment. Councilman Grabowski asked the following questions: (1) can there be an appeal, if so, who is going to pay the costs since the defendant has the judgment against the plaintiff of the suit; (2) if the costs include the fees charged against the attorneys representing the Town, how is the money going to be raised to pay these fees; and (3) is this judgment reversible. The City Attorney stated: (1) yes, there could be an appeal, however, none has been filed as yet; (2) court costs will be paid by the unsuccessful plaintiff, attorney fees would be paid out of the district; and (3) theoretically, yes, the judgment is reversible but it would be a difficult appeal. Councilmen Grabowski then asked the amount the people of S.A.D. No. 9 would be required to pay; the City Attorney replied he wasn't sure of the amount.