My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/18/1965
LOSALTOSHILLS
>
City Clerk
>
City Council Minutes
>
1965
>
01/18/1965
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 11:43:27 AM
Creation date
8/13/2015 3:01:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Minutes
Date
1965-01-18
Description
Regular Meeting Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL <br />TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS <br />MINUTE"a OF -A REGULAR MEETING <br />January 18, 1965 <br />The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the Town of Los Altos <br />MB Cl t M <br />Hills was called to order by ayor Wm. ay on, on, <br />ay, <br />January 18, 1965 at 7:53 P. M. at the Town Hall, 26379 Fremont <br />Road, Los Altos .Hills, California. <br />ROLL CALL: .PRESENT: Councilmen Aiken, Bowler, Mayor Clayton <br />ABSENT: Councilmen Fowle, Henley. <br />PLsTNING.COMMISSION <br />REPRESENTATIVE: ?falter A. Benson <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 13, 1965• <br />Action deferred to February 1, 1965 _ <br />Meeting. <br />COMMUNICATIONS: None. - <br />ANNOUNCEMENTS: None. <br />CJ COMMITTEE REPORTS: <br />1. Path Construction Priority - City Manager. <br />The City Manager submitted to the Council a priority list <br />for path construction, which was discussed -and recommended <br />for approval by the Planning Commission at its meeting of <br />December. 28n, with one addition, namely: 7A -- Westerly <br />side of Fremont Road from-Robleda Hills Unit #2 to <br />Robleda Road; <br />Council will study the report and the matter will be taken <br />up at the February 1st meeting. <br />2. Per .Lot Assessment - City Manager.' <br />In compliance with the Council's request for an estimate as <br />to the time involved on a per lot assessment study, the City <br />Manager was of the opinion if a member of the Staff or an <br />interested individual were available to work full time on the <br />.project, it could be accomplished in 30 to 60 days; however, <br />under the present'work circumstances of the Staff, it would - <br />require four to five months. <br />It .appeared to Councilman -Bowler that determining the "per <br />lot assessment" figure was not the critical part, and that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.