Laserfiche WebLink
been discussions in January between Acting City Engineer Dave Ross and Palo Alto <br /> regarding the traffic signalization at Arastradero. <br /> • Mayor O'Malley advised Council that the Palo Alto City Council had continued their <br /> final vote on the Development Agreement until the Los Altos Hills Council had the <br /> opportunity to direct their questions to the Palo Alto staff at tonight's meeting. <br /> Mayor Pro Tem Kerr requested additional 'information from Palo Alto staff on the public <br /> transit aspect of the development's transportation plan. Kerr questioned whether public <br /> shuttles would serve the Stanford Research Park and if they would be available to the <br /> Town's residents. <br /> Gayle Likens, Transportation Projects Manager, briefly summarized the City's <br /> transportation network and noted that the free shuttles were available to the public at <br /> large. <br /> Councilmember Jones requested further clarification regarding the traffic aspect of the <br /> Development Agreement; most notably their conclusion that the traffic increase as a <br /> result of the development would be modest and that traffic signals would not encourage <br /> "cut through"traffic into Los Altos Hills. <br /> Emslie provided an overview of the process that Palo Alto had undertaken in assessing <br /> the impact of growth at the Research Park. It was determined that the mitigation <br /> measures at the intersections presently being discussed (signal lights) would be necessary <br /> • without any additional growth in the Park due to regional traffic growth. <br /> Heba El-Givendy, Transportation Engineer, explained the analysis of the traffic counts <br /> that had been conducted and why they warranted the signalization of the intersections. <br /> She explained that the most recent traffic counts were for 2003-2004 and noted that the <br /> City would like to avoid widening Arastradero and would like to monitor the traffic flow <br /> at both intersections to determine when the installation of the signals would be <br /> appropriate. El-Givendy did not have the information requested by Councilmember <br /> Jones with her and offered to forward it to Council. She concluded her comments by <br /> noting that Palo Alto had determined that there would be no "cut through" traffic by <br /> reviewing the roadway layout of the network and where the trips would be generated from <br /> and their distance. The location of the two intersections in the overall network was the <br /> main determining factor that lead to their final opinion. <br /> OPENED PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> Martha Bowden, Saddle Court, expressed her concern that traffic signals on Arastradero <br /> would encourage motorists to increase their speeds. As President of the Terman Middle <br /> School PTA, she had expended great effort to limit the numbers of kids commuting to <br /> school in cars and had encouraged students to ride bikes or walk. Bowden noted that the <br /> Palo Alto study was a traffic flow report and had not included number counts for <br /> bicyclists and she was very concerned that the road was not a safe route for students to <br /> school. She believed that traffic signs were the best deterrent to slow motorists traveling <br /> • on Arastradero. <br /> 4 <br /> City Council Meeting Minutes <br /> May 19,2005 <br />