Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />January 18, 2018 <br />ultimately on the issues that are still of some significant concern and then the <br />Council will attempt to make a decision around those issues. <br /> <br />Planning Director Suzanne Avila presented the staff report. <br /> <br />Council discussion ensued. <br /> <br />Director Avila responded to questions regarding CCRs and conditions of approval. <br /> <br />City Attorney Mattas responded to questions from the Council regarding CCRs. <br /> <br />Applicant Rosy Ko presented her application for the subdivision. <br /> <br />Mayor Radford opened the Public Hearing. <br /> <br />Susan Mandle, Planning Commissioner, Los Altos Hills, clarified why she voted <br />no on the project and requested the topic be returned to the Planning Commission <br />so they can do their due diligence. <br /> <br />Kit Gordon, Los Altos Hills, requested that calculations be verified for lots 8 and <br />9. <br /> <br />Director Avila responded to Ms. Gordon's comments. <br /> <br />Sue Welch, Los Altos Hills, expressed concerns about lot 7. <br /> <br />Carol Gottlieb, Los Altos Hills, said there is a grove of oak trees that aren't <br />protected and she personally feels these trees should be saved through an open <br />space easement. <br /> <br />Jitze Couperus, Planning Commissioner, Los Altos Hills, said he agreed with <br />Commissioner Mandle that the Planning Commission can be more innovative. <br /> <br />Nancy Couperus, Los Altos Hills, said she is an open space advocate and prefers <br />the idea of no fencing. <br /> <br />Richard Partridge, Planning Commissioner, Los Altos Hills, explained the <br />process that occurred during Planning Commission meetings for this project. <br /> <br />Jim Basiji, Planning Commissioner, Los Altos Hills, said that the Commission <br />reached a consensus that all critical issues were agreed upon. Language of <br />conditions of approval were discussed; he responded that the issues were framed <br />well enough that staff could use their expertise and skills to come up with the <br />language to do the job. <br />