My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
78-23
LOSALTOSHILLS
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
2023
>
78-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 10:57:08 AM
Creation date
8/22/2023 10:47:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
Number
78-23
Date
08/17/2023
Description
Denying the Appeal (APL23-0003) of the Planning Commission's July 13, 2023 Decision and Upholding the Approval of a Conditional Development Permit (CDP23-0002), Site Development Permit (SD22-0066), and Variance (VAR23-0001) at 25851 Estacada Drive with Conditions of Approval Issued on July 13, 2023 Planning Commission Public Hearing
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
View images
View plain text
could be located. 25851 (the subject property), 25835, and 25811 Estacada Drive have <br />approximately 15 -foot setbacks and were constructed pre -incorporation of the Town. <br />14554 and 14576 De Bell Road have approximately 15 -foot setbacks and were constructed <br />pre -incorporation. 14555 Miranda Road has approximately 10- to 15 -foot setbacks and was <br />constructed pre -incorporation. Additionally, the granting of the Variance would not grant <br />a special privilege to the property owner as there are not many neighborhoods with similar <br />constraints and existing development patterns which this could set a precedence for. <br />3. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare <br />or injurious to the property, improvements or uses within the immediate vicinity and within <br />the same zoning district. <br />The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public as the structure would <br />not encroach into the front setback and would not encroach any further to either side. The <br />frontage and visual impact would be similar to predevelopment levels apart from the <br />structure's height. When viewed from the front, the increased height appears less than it <br />actually is due to the primary roof sloping away from the street. The granting of the <br />variance could pose an increased visual impact to the easterly neighbor but no view will be <br />blocked and so it would not be injurious to the property's value. <br />4. That the variance will not authorize a use or activity which is not otherwise expressly <br />authorized by the zoning district regulations governing the parcel or property. <br />The variance would not change the use of the structure. Single-family residences are <br />allowed in the R -A zoning district. <br />Resolution 78-23 Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).