My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/05/2001 (2)
LOSALTOSHILLS
>
City Clerk
>
City Council Minutes
>
2001
>
04/05/2001 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2015 4:35:23 PM
Creation date
2/25/2015 4:23:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Minutes
Date
2001-04-05
Description
Special Meeting Minutes - Joint Planning Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> Items B, C and O were addressed together. The issue was raised that if <br /> development was increased beyond the grading ordinance was the Town <br /> going to uphold its ordinances and if not how was this going to affect the <br /> visual appearance of the hills and the increased development allowed on <br /> lots. Fenwick stated that according to the current Code the City Engineer <br /> was responsible for reviewing drainage and erosion impacts. Cottrell <br /> recommended a Master Plan which would show where all the drainage in <br /> Town goes. <br /> C. Site erosion assessment and control Fenwick <br /> D. Site grading restrictions Fenwick <br /> It was noted that this was a policy and not an ordinance. It was agreed that <br /> this was an issue that needed to be reviewed by the Commission. <br /> E. Retaining wall regulations Fenwick <br /> It was noted that this was a policy and not an ordinance. It was agreed that <br /> this was an issue that needed to be reviewed by the Commission. Gottlieb <br /> reiterated her concerns that this issue needed to be looked at in connection <br /> • with others and how they each affected one another. <br /> F. Swimming pools in development area Fenwick <br /> The question was asked as to how this issue was first raised and whether it <br /> was still applicable. It was agreed this issue would be reviewed. <br /> G. Setbacks vs. height restriction Fenwick <br /> Casey suggested looking at the setback and height restrictions for larger <br /> homes and perhaps allowing an increased height for homes with larger <br /> setbacks. Finn suggested perhaps offering some kind of incentives for <br /> such increases in setbacks. It was agreed all setbacks of a home would <br /> need to be considered and Gottlieb urged that neighbors' views be <br /> considered. Casey further commented that the design guidelines were out <br /> of date and needed to be reviewed. <br /> H. Council's expectations of the Planning Commission Cottrell <br /> Casey recommended a broader role for the Planning Commission which <br /> included administering the ordinances of the Town in a fair and consistent <br /> April 5, 2001 <br /> Special City Council Meeting <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.