My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/15/2001
LOSALTOSHILLS
>
City Clerk
>
City Council Minutes
>
2001
>
02/15/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2015 4:34:56 PM
Creation date
2/25/2015 4:26:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Minutes
Date
2001-02-15
Description
Regular Meeting Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• when they went through the building process. Their home is close to the park <br /> and ride and this path is behind their property. They have small children and are <br /> concerned for safety reasons. <br /> Council agreed that they would go out and look at the location of the pathway <br /> and this request would be agendized for the March 15th Council Meeting. <br /> Jim Abraham, 12831 Viscaino Road, referred to the earlier discussion on cable <br /> tv. He questioned whether Sun Country Cable was in compliance with its <br /> franchise agreement with the Town and he wanted assurances that AT&T would <br /> meet the contractural obligations of the franchise agreement. Mr. Abraham also <br /> referred to the large construction job at Fremont and Campo Vista and the <br /> parking of construction vehicles along the road and in front of Bullis School. <br /> Mr. Abraham was assured that the contractor would be advised that these <br /> construction vehicles needed to be parked on the site or off road. <br /> 11. PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> 11.1 Introduction of ordinance amending Sections 10-1.5020 and 10- <br /> 1.5030 of the Los Altos Hills Municipal Code regarding allowable <br /> development area and floor area on constrained lots and adoption of a <br /> negative declaration(FIRST READING) <br /> • Council had before them the following wording for the proposed changes to the <br /> constrained lot ordinance. This wording as put forward by Fenwick was a <br /> clarification of the actions taken at the last Council Meeting on this issue: <br /> "The allowable development area on any parcel or lot shall not be reduced to less <br /> than seven thousand five hundred square feet in any case by application of the <br /> provisions of this section, except in the case of parcels or lots which have a lot <br /> unit factor of.50 or less. These parcels or lots require a conditional development <br /> permit and development area may be restricted below seven thousand five <br /> hundred square feet as a condition of the permit. Development area for lots <br /> which require a conditional development permit shall not be reduced to less than <br /> the maximum floor area allowed by Section 10-1.5030 below,plus 2,100 square <br /> feet. The Site Development Authority may approve development area of up to a <br /> total of four thousand-five hundred square feet for any lot without requiring a <br /> variance, so long as the findings for a conditional development permit are <br /> approved. The allowable floor area on any parcel or lot of at least one gross acre <br /> and with a LUF of less than 1 but greater than .5 shall not be reduced to less than <br /> five thousand square feet. For parcels and lots less than one gross acre in size <br /> and with a LUF of less than 1 but greater than .5, the following formula shall <br /> apply: MFA= 3000+(gross acreage)x 2000+2000 (LUF-.5)." <br /> February 15, 2001 <br /> Regular City Council Meeting <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.