Laserfiche WebLink
�. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel, seconded by Dauber and <br />passed unanimously to adopt Resolution #5-97 approving change order No. 2 to the <br />contract for the construction of the Pavement Management and Storm Drain <br />Improvement Project FY95-96 with C.F. Archibald Paving. <br />5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />5.1 Approval of contract for Financial Software System and Associated <br />Resources -- Reso # <br />Council discussed the staffing request and the location of this staff person. They also <br />inquired about the number of days allowed for training and were advised that the <br />contract allowed for eighteen days total. Council further thanked staff, the Finance <br />Committee and the Technology Improvement Committee for their assistance with this <br />project. <br />MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Johnson, seconded by Dauber and <br />passed unanimously to adopt Resolution #6-97 approving and authorizing execution of <br />a software license and support agreement between the Town and BI -TECH Software, <br />Inc. <br />6. NEW BUSINESS <br />6.1 Expiration of term on the Los Altos Library Commission <br />PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To direct the City Clerk to advertise this vacancy and to <br />contact Mr. Weissman to see if he would stay on the Commission until a replacement is <br />appointed. <br />6.2 Appeal of interpretation of required floodproofing and/or request for <br />variance to allow substantial improvement of the existing residence <br />at Lands of Coffman, 25280 Cantata Way <br />Mr. Coffman, applicant, explained that the finished floor elevation of the existing <br />structure was above the base flood elevation as established by the Santa Clara Valley <br />Water District and this was in conformance with the Town's Codes and the National <br />Flood Insurance Program. However, the Town's Floodplain Administrator had stated <br />that the floor elevation must be at least 12 inches above the base flood elevation. Mr. <br />Coffman stated that they were appealing this decision because of hardship to his family. <br />They would have to tear down the existing home and start all over and this was <br />financially not possible. <br />i� Regular City Council Meeting <br />January 15, 1997 <br />