My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/05/1994
LOSALTOSHILLS
>
City Clerk
>
City Council Minutes
>
1994
>
01/05/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2016 12:14:47 PM
Creation date
5/27/2015 10:55:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Minutes
Date
1994-01-05
Description
Regular Meeting Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 Council agreed that the facilities were inadequate and these funds were needed. <br />br Johnson did comment that while he had confidence in those supporting this <br />measure and believed the bond was necessary, he questioned whether the amount <br />of 'not to exceed $68.5 million' was the right amount. It could be that it was too <br />much or even too little to accomplish the goal. <br />MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Tryon, seconded by Hubbard and <br />passed unanimously to support Measure B on the April 12, 1994 ballot concerning <br />the passage of general obligation bonds to provide the funds necessary to <br />rehabilitate, construct and modernize classrooms and facilities at both Los Altos and <br />Mountain View High Schools and to request the residents of the Town to turn out <br />for a yes vote on this measure. <br />7. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES. SUB -COMMITTEES, AND <br />COUNCILMEMBERS ON OUTSIDE AGENCIES <br />7.1 Residential Design Guidelines Subcommittee <br />Dauber reported that a meeting was scheduled for January 19th to look at the final <br />drawings with the consultant. The final version of the design guidelines will <br />be brought back to Council at the February 2nd meeting. <br />7.2 Town Handbook Subcommittee <br />Tryon presented to the Council a draft of the handbook. A discussion followed on <br />the pictures to be included, the budget, the stock of paper and whether to use <br />four color or duo tone. Tryon believed the color issue was an aesthetic decision <br />which Council needed to make. Siegel asked how much money would be <br />saved by using duo -tone and also stated that there should be a clear <br />understanding of what the total cost of this project is including mailing and <br />postage. Dauber wanted to be sure that the additional materials (safety flags, <br />pathway map, directory) fit in the back pocket of the handbook. <br />Candace Oanbrecht, PRX, commented that she was prepared to answer any questions <br />the Council had on the handbook. She noted that the picture depicting the <br />large gate and pillars needed to be replaced by another more appropriate <br />picture. This would change the timetable for the completion of the project. <br />She would redo the schedule and provide the Council with an update. It was <br />also agreed that at the next Council meeting a report on the actual costs of the <br />project would be provided as well as a report on the inserts for the packet in the <br />handbook and whether or not they will all fit. <br />January 5, 1994 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.