Laserfiche WebLink
4.2 Approval of Warrants: $27,462.97 (1/31/92 <br /> $48,348.87 (2/4/92) <br /> $112,301.09 (2/14/92) <br /> 4.4 Request from Los Altos Fire Department for Weed Abatement on a <br /> Certain Property (APN 182-29-61) <br /> Items Removed: <br /> 4.1 Approval of Minutes: February 5, 1992 <br /> MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Hubbard, seconded by Siegel and <br /> passed by the following roll call vote to approve the minutes of the February 5, 1992 <br /> City Council Meeting with the following correction: page 6, fourth paragraph, first <br /> sentence should read: " no building permits would be issued until certain of the <br /> conditions as expressed in the conditions of the subdivision approval were met" <br /> AYES: Mayor Hubbard and Councilmembers Casey, Siegel and Tryon <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSTAIN: Councilmember Johnson <br /> 4.2 Request for Extension of the Expiration Date of a Site Development <br /> Permit for Lands of Yanez, 26242 Fremont Road <br /> Council had received a request from Mr. Yanez for an extension of his site <br /> development permit. The staff report included the information that Mr. Yanez had <br /> been issued a site development permit in December 1989; had received an <br /> administrative extension for an additional year to expire in December 1991; and had <br /> submitted a second request for extension of the original site development permit on <br /> February 6, 1992, due to extreme financial hardships. <br /> Tryon expressed her concerns about the allowed development areas and the fact that <br /> this project was to the maximums; there was not enough development area <br /> remaining for even a walkway. She further noted that the site development policy <br /> was not in effect in 1989 and now the Council reviewed new homes. She believed <br /> this application should be reviewed by Council but that additional fees could be <br /> waived. Siegel stated that this was the reason why permits expired -- ordinances <br /> were reviewed and changed. He believed that extending this application would be <br /> unfair to the Town and the application should be subject to review. Johnson <br /> February 19, 1992 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> 3 <br />