Laserfiche WebLink
proposed Vidovich General Plan Amendment, annexation to the Town of the <br /> quarry property and the possibility of a memorandum of understanding between the <br /> Town and the developer. It was noted that while the Neary Quarry was in the <br /> Town's Sphere of Influence, it had never been added to the Urban Service Area. <br /> Dauber believed that if the Town wanted to annex the quarry property, they should <br /> do it now. Hubbard believed that annexation was inevitable but at this time he <br /> recommended a development agreement between the County, developer and Town <br /> to facilitate the process. Siegel commented that annexation at this time would be a <br /> time-consuming burden on staff. Already staff time was being used as well as <br /> consultant's time (William Cotton) for which the Town was not being reimbursed <br /> and the Town would not be able to recoup any costs if the County was subdividing <br /> the property. Siegel also believed that a residential subdivision in the quarry was a <br /> good option -- better than having the old quarry back. However, this did not mean <br /> that he believed a lake should be included. Johnson suggested that the Council <br /> decide what end result they wanted. He thought if this decision was made, the <br /> various factors would fall into place. Council also discussed the issue of sewers for <br /> the property and noted that they did have control over this aspect of the project. <br /> Jean Struthers, 13690 Robleda, asked who was responsible for the quarry reclamation <br /> plan and also if it included restoring Hale Creek. Mrs. Struthers also noted that the <br /> trail system was very important. <br /> Siegel responded to Mrs. Struthers' question by saying that if the quarry was annexed <br /> to the Town, the Town would be in control of the reclamation plan. Further the <br /> City Attorney noted that two years ago she and the Director of Public Works, Bill <br /> Ekern, had asked the County if the Town annexed the property would the County be <br /> in a position to provide a contract for reclamation plan service. The County had <br /> indicated they were not interested in this option. On the subject of liability the City <br /> Attorney also commented that if the lake and road were private there would be no <br /> liability to the Town. On the other hand if the lake and road were public, the Town <br /> would be liable. <br /> Muriel Knudsen, 27992 Central, stated her concerns about sewers going through the <br /> preserve. She was not in favor of this. <br /> Captain Robert Wilson, Sheriff's Department, commented on the proposed lake and <br /> noted that this could prove to be dangerous attraction. <br /> September 30, 1992 <br /> Adjourned Regular Meeting <br /> 3 <br />