Laserfiche WebLink
Johnson noted that the requested application was for a fence around the <br /> 41100 property but it would not go across the creek. In his opinion this did not <br /> make any sense as it would not enclose her property and keep animals in <br /> and people out. Dr. Forward should be building the fence on her side of <br /> the property to accomplish these goals. <br /> Dr. Peter Schubart, 24624 Olive Tree Lane, reiterated his concerns about Dr. <br /> Forward's request. In the first place the fence was started without permit. <br /> Additionally, he did not undertstand why the request for a fence was being <br /> made; it would not keep animals in or people out. He asked why Dr. <br /> Forward just didn't plant a screen if she wanted to identify her property. If <br /> a fence was permitted, Dr. Schubart believed it should not be chain link, <br /> the posts should be painted and the fence should be unobtrusive. <br /> A. Richard Jones, Planning Commissioner, stated that when this was discussed <br /> at the Planning Commission meeting, Dr. Forward had stated she wanted <br /> a fence around the entire perimeter of her property and also noted that Dr. <br /> Forward had apparently not understood the easement issue on her <br /> property. <br /> MOTION SECONDED AND FAILED: Moved by Hubbard, seconded by Tryon <br /> and failed by the following roll call vote to approve with conditions the <br /> request for a variance to the fence height/setback requirements of the <br /> Zoning Code for Lands of Forward, 10575 Blandor Way. <br /> AYES: Mayor Hubbard and Councilmember Casey <br /> NOES: Mayor Pro Tern Tryon and Councilmember Johnson <br /> ABSENT: Councilmemer Siegel <br /> Tryon stated that she did not vote in favor of this request for a variance because <br /> the applicant, although she had submitted a letter, had not been present at <br /> the Council Meeting to answer questions and concerns raised by the <br /> Council and a neighbor regarding her application. <br /> 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br /> 8. NEW BUSINESS <br /> 8.1 Request for Action on Regional Governance Issues <br /> Council commented on the statement of Town Policy made at the September <br /> 18, 1991 Council Meeting on the issue of a regional form of government <br /> for the San Francisco Bay Area. At that meeting Council stated that the <br /> primary position of the Town concerning the formation of a regional form <br /> December 18, 1991 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> 9 <br />