Laserfiche WebLink
D. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR: (continued) : <br /> formed several years ago, Committee for Responsible Government, on the <br /> issue of public safety. Mr. Downey further commented that the <br /> Sheriff ' s Department had served the Town well for 30 years and he felt <br /> the residents of the Town should decide who should provide police <br /> services . <br /> Mr. Morrow, 24300 Dawnridge, asked if Council was doing anything about <br /> the possibility of sound walls on IS 280 and commented on truck bans <br /> on I5280. Mayor Tryon noted that the sound walls were a part of the <br /> widening project of IS 280 by Caltrans . <br /> Mrs . Teddi Schick, 26400 Weston, asked for clarification of the <br /> negotiations with the Los Altos Police Department for police services, <br /> if the issue would go to a vote of the people and when all the <br /> information would be available. Mayor Tryon commented on the City <br /> Manager ' s report on the negotiations with Los Altos and the importance <br /> of the results of the questionnaire. She noted that more information <br /> on this subject would be forthcoming from staff. <br /> E. REPORT FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION: <br /> Commissioner Struthers reported that the December 23 , 1987 meeting of <br /> ` the Commission had been cancelled and a study session on the draft <br /> ir housing element was scheduled for Deonber 30, 1987. The following <br /> items had been discussed at the 12/9/87 Commission meeting: Lands of <br /> Owen Homes , 13430 Country Way, request for approval of site <br /> development permit for new residence and swimming pool - approved; <br /> Lands of Carr, 24600 Bella Ladera Drive, File VAR #24-87 and CUP #6-87 <br /> - approved; Lands of Wong, File VAR #15-87 and Lands of Alepin, File <br /> CUP #7-87 and Lands of Markoff , File VAR #23-87 and Lands of <br /> Scharfetter, File CDP #1-87, VAR #12-87 were all continued. <br /> F. PUBLIC HEARING: <br /> 1. LANDS OF VIDINSKY, 24250 Hillview Road, appeal of Planning <br /> Commission' s decision to request right-of-way dedication <br /> Council had before them the 12/8/87 report prepared by the Director of <br /> Public Works which included the staff recommendation that the request <br /> for the road right-of-way be maintained and stated that it was the <br /> policy of the Site Development Committee to request right-of-way <br /> dedication for roads which did not meet the current standard of <br /> 30 'half-street, with certain criteria. <br /> Mrs. Vidinsky, applicant, explained that in the review and approval of <br /> their plans for a remodel the requirement for road right of way <br /> dedication had not been mentioned. In fact their project had been <br /> approved when it was noted after the fact that this requirement had <br /> _3_ 12/16/87 <br />