Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL MINUI''ES - February 5, 1986 <br /> E. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (continued) : <br /> 2. LANDS OF HEPPICC, 28041 Horseshoe Court, request for a special lard use <br /> permit to allow construction of a new residence having a height in excess <br /> of fifteen feet <br /> The Town Planner presented her 1/29/86 staff repurt which noted that the Site <br /> Develogrent Ccnudttee remm:ended approval of a special lard use permit for the <br /> proposed new residence based on the project's substantial conformance with the <br /> guidelines for Ordinance #295. The report further wmanted that while the lot was <br /> on a very visible ridgeline, the applicant had agreed with certain mitigating <br /> measures to lessen the visual impact of the project. <br /> Nr. Bob DoAnaral, ardlitect, explained the grading and landscaping of the project. <br /> He also cemented on the small roof area which exceeds the height limit. Apparently <br /> this was a misunderstanding and according to his estimates, the highest peak was a <br /> triangle section 12" over the height limits. This peak was over the central stairwell <br /> and he would be pleased to lower the triangle to the required 27'. <br /> Mr. Charles Herpick, applicant, contented that he was building the home for himself <br /> and explained why he sited the residence on the lot as shown on the plans. He <br /> particularly noted that he wanted a view of Stanford and he wanted to avoid the <br /> noise of 280. <br /> Allison stated that he could not make the following findings regarding the application <br /> for lands of Herpick: Section 5(c) (i) and (iii) : The City Council nay not grant a <br /> special land use permit unless it finds that the following general conditions exist- <br /> 'The establishment and maintenance of the use applied for conform with the comprehen- <br /> sive zoning and land use regulations being studied, or which the Council intends to <br /> study within a reasonable time' . and 'The proposed use is not detrimental or injurious <br /> to property and improvements in the neighborhood and is appropriate to the location, <br /> the lot and the neighborhood' . Dronkert stated that she could not make the following <br /> finding regarding the Lards of Herpick: Section 5(b) (i) : The effect which the proposed <br /> use has on the comprehensive zoning and land use regulations which the Council <br /> currently has under study. ' Dronkert did suggest a field trip with the applicant <br /> to help clarify the application of these guidelines to the project under discussion. <br /> 1 MOTION SECONDED AND TABLED: Moved by Fuhrman, seconded by Dronkert and tabled to <br /> grant a special land use permit for Lards of Herpick based on the project's sub- <br /> stantial conformance with the guidelines for Ordinance #295 <br /> MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Allison, seconded by Dienkert to continue <br /> lands of Herpick, request for a special landuse permit to the next Council meeting <br /> to allow the applicant the opportunity to review the plans. (AMENDED BY COUNCIL <br /> modify 2/19/86) <br /> 3. LANDS OF I.ANIS, lot #3, Canario Way, request for a special land use permit <br /> to allow construction of a new residence having a height in excess of fifteen <br /> feet. <br /> This item was continued at the request of the applicant. <br /> -3- <br />