Laserfiche WebLink
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Tryon, seconded by Dronkert and <br />f passed by the following roll call vote to grant a special land use <br />permit for the Lands of Wong based on the project's conformance with <br />Ordinance #295. <br />AYES: Mayor Fuhrman and Councilmembers Dronkert and Tryon <br />NOES: Councilmember van Tamelen <br />ABSENT: Mayor Pro Tem Rydell <br />Council commented that while this project may not meet the specific <br />guidelines of the urgency ordinance, it was in conformance with the <br />intent and purpose of adopting the urgency ordinance. van Tamelen, <br />however, stated that she could not approve a special land use permit <br />for this project as it was a substandard lot, created by a former <br />4i Council, and while it was a legal lot, the house was too large for the <br />AW lot. <br />4. Resolution # declaring that the public interest and <br />necessity require theacquisition of certain interests in properties <br />located in the vicinity of Fremont Road (S -Curve Project - Lands of <br />Miller - Fremont Road - eminent domain) <br />The City Manager reported that additional information had been <br />received concerning the proposed acquisition of land from the Millers, <br />part of which was the appraiser's report. <br />Mr. Anthony Lagorio, attorney for Mr. and Mrs. Miller, commented that <br />they had not had an opportunity to review the new materials. <br />PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To schedule an adjourned regular meeting for 2:00 <br />p.m. on Monday, June 9, 1986 to conduct the public hearing on the <br />proposed acquisition of property from the Lands of Miller for the S - <br />Curve Project. <br />5. LANDS OF KERMAN, Lot #14, Matadero Creek, request for increase <br />in maximum development area and building coverage and an encroachment <br />into landscape easement. <br />The Town Planner referred to her report dated 5/29/86 which noted that <br />the applicants had originally been heard by Council in April of 1986. <br />At that time Council recommended that the applicant meet with staff <br />regarding their request for an increase in MDA and return to Council <br />at a later time with a modified request. While this had occurred, <br />staff was unable to recommend approval of the request of an increase <br />in the MDA or of the request for an encroachment into the landscape <br />easement. Neither of these requests appeared to be in conformance with <br />the Town's policies. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Kerman, applicants, addressed the Council and explained <br />their their request for an increase in maximum development area and <br />building coverage and for an encroachment permit into the landscaping <br />easement. This request resulted from their desire to have a stable on <br />L their property. Mrs. Kerman also noted that several of the local <br />1► stables would be closing in the near future and she suggested that the <br />-4- <br />