09/19/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

%1W CITY COUNCIL MIN[7PFS - September 19, 1984 D. SPECIAL ORDERS: Item 5 (continued): Alan Lembert, developer, noted that the Matadero Creek Subdivision had the preL,m,nary site development process which had caused different problems for the owners. In addition different interpretations of maxin mn development area had caused problems with development on the lots. Mr. Lannbert stated that he had been told not to develop landscape plans until the house was built to see where landscape screening was necessary, etc. Not only did Mr. Lambert think the Town should extend the Site Development Permit, he also felt the Town should review the new landscape plans as prepared by the land- scape architect because he felt they were better plans than those previously reviewed by staff. Charles Chase, applicant's attorney, expressed the opinion that there were unusual difficulties an camp etrng the work within the timeframe. In addition to the tunever of staff at Than Hall which caused confusion, he also noted that large hares take a long time to build. Mr. Chase explained to Council his understanding of the real estate agreement entered into by Mr. Del Castello with the Town and expressed the opinion that Council should honer its part of the bargain. The City Attorney explained the real estate process at the time of the lot sales at Matadero Creek. He noted that the opportunity was extended to potential buyers at Matadero Creek to get a preliminary idea of what could be done on a lot. Potential buyers could net get a Site Development Permit prior to purchase. In addition, the City Attorney noted that changes made at the time were net done for sale purposes; they were studied and individually evaluated by the Council. M TION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Nbved by Dronkert, seconded by Fuhr an and passed unanimously to approve a six-month extension for the Site Development Permit for Lot #20 - Matadero Creek Subdivision MMON SIXbfIDID AND CARRIED: Moved by van Tamel.en, seconded by Fuhn[an and passed unanimously to request the Planning Cammission to prepare a recamE da- tjon on the SitQ Development Permit section of the Code relative to the length of time for a permit. Due to a prior commitment, Councilmenber Rydell left the meeting at 9:30 p.m. E. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Budget Amendment: Mountain View landfill Agreement - FY 1984-85 MITTION SEIXkIDID AMID CARRIED: Mbved by van Tamelen, seconded by Fuhrman and passed unanimously by all members present to approve the following budget amendment with the following notation 'If reasonably feasible in the City Manager's opinion, the title of the General Fund Revenue Account will be changed from Solid waste Sur- charge to Solid Waste Disposal': (1) The creation of a General Fund Revenue Account entitled 'Solid Waste Surcharge' listed under charges for current services and listing estimated revenues of $114,058. (2) The creation of a General Fund Department entitled 'Public Works - Solid Waste Disposal' containing the following accounts and expenditures - Outside Contract - Mountain View Dump $48,700 and Debt Service - Solid Waste $65,358. -4-