02/18/1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY CDUNCIL NIINUPFS - February 18, 1981 E. SPECIAL ORDERS: Public Hearinqs: a) Ordinance #_amerding Chapter 5 entitled "Zoning" of the Ins Altos Hills Municipal Code by ammending subsection (b) of Section 9-5.503 concerning walls and fences (SB OND READING) MOTION SEODNDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Proft, seconded by Hillestad and passed unanvmously to continue this iter to the 3/4/81 Council Meeting. b) Appeal of Planning Cammission approval of Site Development Permit for tennis court/pool/spa, File A #4775, 12169 Padre Court NOTION SEODNDED AND CARRIED: Movedy by Hillestad, seconded by Perkin and passed unanimously to continue this item to the 3/4/81 Council Meeting. c) Resolution # approving ani adopting a path and trail element and amending the General Plan for said City The City Engineer reported that the path and trail element described the basic framework for the development of ron-vehicular traffic within the Planning Area. He further noted the general objectives of the element, the principles, stan- dards and classifications. The City Engineer further reported that both the Planning Ccamissioh and the Pathways Committee reoonnended approval of the path and trail element. Councilman Pmft questioned whether principle #1 and #12 conflicted? The City Engineer responded that #1 was to establish criteria which would be used for existing lots and subdivisions whereas #12 would be to instill a philosophy for nes lots that would not impinge on present lots. Councilman Perkins suggested that parts of the element should be carefully studied grammatically for clarifi- cation purposes and he further suggested continuing this item to the next meeting so that the statement could be carefully gone over. MOTION SEODNDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Hillestad, seconded by McReynolds and passed unanimously to continue this iter to the next meeting so that points of clarification could be inserted in the path and trail element where necessary. d) Appeal of Variance and Permit Cammission denial for IANDS OF SOMIDEF, File VAR #11-80 Assistant Planner Pat Webb reported that on October 22, 1980 the Variance and Permit Commission had considered and denied a variance request for a thirty foot maximum encroachment into the rear yard setback line for a wind screen above the six foot height limit. The applicants returned with a new plan and on December 10, 1980 the Variance and Permit Commission considered a variance request for a 24 foot maximum encroachment into the rear yard setback line for a wind screen to exceed six feet in height. This request was denied because Condition #2 of the Variance Requirements had not been met and there were other alternatives the applicant could take. -3-