05/15/1972 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

'SCHEDULED ITEM NO. 2: "A POLICY PLAN FOR THE BAYLANDS OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY" - Eleanor Young, County Plan- ning Staff. Eleanor Young, of the County Planning Staff, presented the Policy Plan for the Bay - lands of Santa Clara County. Enthusiastic Council discussion followed: MOTION, SECONDED AND CARRIED: Councilman Davey moved, seconded by Grabowski and carried unanimously to endorse the Planning Policy Committee's Plan for the Baylands of Santa Clara County. SCHEDULED ITEM N0, 3: TENTATIVE A OR DENNIS J. ARCHIBALD (381-71) 2 lots. Staff reviewed the Planning Commission discussion of May 8th and their recommended Check List. Council concurred. MOTION, SECONDED AND CARRIED: Councilman Davey moved, seconded by Grabowski and carried unanimously that the Tentative Map (381-71) of Dennis J. Archibald for 2 lots be approved In accordance with the May 8, 1972 Check List. SCHEDULED ITEM NO. 4: TENTATIVE E H. BISHOP (385-72) 4 lots. Staff reviewed the Planning Commission discussion of May 8th and their recommended Check List. Council concurred. MOTION, SECONDED AND CARRIED: Councilman Davey moved, seconded by Grabowski and carried unanimously that the Tentative Map (385-72) of Jerome H. Bishop for four lots be approved in accordance with the May 8, 1972 Check List. SCHEDULED ITEM NO. 5: BUILDING SI E APP VAL FOR HUGH L. MONAHAN (BSA -73-71) 2 lots. Staff reviewed the Planning Commission discussion of May 8th and their recommended Check List. Council concurred. MOTION, SECONDED AND CARRIED: Councilman Davey moved, seconded by Grabowski and carried unanimously that the request of Hugh L. Monahan for Building Site Approval (BSA -73-71) for 2 lots at the end of E. Sunset Drive be approved In accordance with the May 8, 1972 Check List. SCHEDULED ITEM NO. 6: APPEAL FOR R I F ROM REQUIREMENT TO CONSTRUCT AN ASPHALT PATH - ROBERT VIGNALATS. Staff reviewed that In June, 1971, the City Council had granted Building Site Appro- val (BSA -62-71) for one lot located at the end of Dori Lane for May Investment Co. The lot was sold to Mr. Robert Vignalats, who has since built a home and is appealing the Town's requirement for a paved bicycle path along the Freeway side of his property He objected to paving this path as he feels It will encourage the motorcycle traffic to which he and his neighbors strongly object. Council discussion noted that paving would not necessarily encourage motorcycle traf- fic as they normally preferred dirt trails. Since the path was considered an Integral part of the Master Path System, Council concurred to support the original Intention of the Check List requirement to pave the bike path. -2-