Laserfiche WebLink
PARKSIDB UNITS #2 and #3 cont'd.: <br />LOT #24 . Councilman Aiken moved, seconded by Davey, to approve a twenty <br />(201) foot setback from the private road. Councilmen Grabowski, <br />Helgesson and Mayor Benson opposed. MOTION FAILED. <br />Council concurred to approve pregrading to the 765' contour to <br />allow a 50 to 60 foot entry drive, with a turnaround as <br />recommended by the Planning Commission. <br />LOT #25 - Councilman Aiken moved, seconded by Davey and carried unanimously, <br />to permit a twenty (201) foot setback from the private road and <br />to allow pregrading of an eighty (801) foot drive with a small <br />turnaround. <br />LOT #26 - Councilman Helgesson moved, seconded by Mayor Benson and carried <br />by majority vote, Councilman Grabowski opposed, to disallow any <br />pregrading or variance. <br />LOT #27) <br />LOT #28) <br />LOT #29) <br />LOT #30) NO VARIANCE OR PREGRADING WAS REQUESTED BY THE APPLICANT. <br />LOT #31)- <br />LOT #32) <br />IAT #33) <br />LOT #34 - Councilman Davey moved, seconded by Helgesson and carried <br />unanimously, that brushing out for 100 feet be allowed but any <br />pregrading be denied. (No variance was requested.) <br />LOT #35 . Councilman Aiken moved, seconded by Helgesson and carried unanimous., <br />ly, to approve twenty feet (201) sideyard setbacks and that <br />sufficient brushing out be allowed to provide walking access to <br />the lot. <br />LOT #36 - Councilman Aiken moved, seconded by Grabowski and carried <br />unanimously, to allow a graded wedge of 5 to 1 up to the road cut. <br />(No variance was requested.) <br />LOT #37 - Councilman Aiken moved, seconded by Helgesson, that a twenty foot <br />(201) setback from the line common with Lot #36 be allowed and <br />that a graded wedge be allowed to provide access to the lot. <br />LOT #38 - Councilman Aiken moved, seconded by Grabowski and carried by <br />majority vote, Councilman Davey opposed, that the variance request <br />be disallowed (since a buyer could later request this if desired), <br />but - respecting the existing trees - pregrading be allowed for <br />the driveway and a limited turnaround. <br />Discussion of septic tanks vs sewers ensued, specifically as it applied to <br />the sixteen lots which, if this area would be required to be sewered, would <br />necessitate the installation of a pump station. One of Mr. Lambert's <br />requests required the Town guarantee him on-site sewage disposal. Speaking <br />from the Floor were Messrs. Glen Hildebrand, of the Santa Clara County Health <br />Department, A. M. Laws, and Thomas Marshall, 25560 Altamont Road. <br />Prior to deciding on approval or disapproval of variances and pregrading for <br />Lots #20, 21 and 22, Mr. Lambert stated that if his requests for these lots <br />are not approved and the Town did not guarantee acceptable septic systems at <br />reasonable cost, the park donation would be in question, since he could not <br />-4. <br />