Laserfiche WebLink
:Specifications (Cont'd.): <br />reviewed the Citizens! Report, offering <br />ie recommendations. (the following: numbered' <br />)nd with the numbered recommendations of <br />"-l. PRIMARY ROADS: <br />The. Planning Commission did not agree completely as to cuts <br />and fills, and recommended.a minimum cut of 1,1i:1, and. <br />fill, .236:1, with the decision to be left to the Town Engineer. <br />The PlanningCommission recommended 8" of compacted rock base <br />rather than the 6" recommended by the Citizens' Committee, <br />and suggested .protection. to the edge of. the road, <br />Citizens'' Planning Com. <br />Plain Road Recommendations Recommendations <br />asphalt width 12' 11' <br />half -=width.. 12' 11' <br />:total width* 24' 22' <br />(Commissioner.Hibner recommended the 24' width) <br />rock shoulder 2' 2'': compacted rock base 6" 8" <br />:PMS : 236" 2'h". <br />Primary Road w/.rolled curb <br />asphalt width 10' 10' <br />half -width. 13' _ 13' <br />" total,width 26' 26' <br />Primary Road,w/ berme <br />asphalt width 11-3/4! 11' <br />half -width 13' 12'fz' ' <br />total width -: ,26-'' 25' <br />Citizens' Committee did not suggest rock shoulder with rolled.. <br />curb orberm - Planning Commission concurred'-.. <br />The. Planning Commission is of the opinion that some serious. <br />though should be given to standardizing on a berm or curb :of <br />one type .and 'prohibiting the use ofall others. "Itwas '.their <br />suggestion the Town standardize the berm. <br />Also suggested was a note that standards may be waived by the <br />Council so''that a change can be made in the specifications in <br />special instances. <br />*. Total width always to the outside edge of road. - <br />