Laserfiche WebLink
w''_t discussed }..• o . . <br /> ACfl IN; <br /> flat the report be e.coeptet. <br /> MOTION: Henley: .,..^.OND; P.her4.ock; .0TE: Passel _...ani._., ... <br /> e Clerk explained that this report did not appear as en item on <br /> r:...e ugen'ua, and that persons reouestirg a study of the possibili- <br /> mes o: forming a r.:n-ric1eol water district were not present. <br /> ,e Mayor requested that the report appear on the Agenda for the <br /> . .ext 12-t n3 <br /> OLT: arrSINES� • <br /> 3.. .'.xford Subdivision. <br /> Mr. Irvin Fallis and Mr. George Pederson, representing the Santa <br /> Clara County Health Dept . , were present to e_cpiain the Health <br /> Department ' s position relative to the sealing of well in question <br /> _n the :,.xford property. <br /> lifter to introducing Mr. Pederson, the Mayor was excused (8:10 FM; <br /> a..d Peouty Mayor Sherlock presided. <br /> Mr. Pederson gave a resume of condition imposed by the Health <br /> at the time the Axford property was subdivided and also conditions <br /> imposed when it was subdivided by Roy Gover. He answered question <br /> a ked by Mr. Roger Mosher, Counsel for Mr. Axford, and Councilmen. <br /> ,..TION: <br /> That the matter be tabled and discussed at the next meeting. <br /> . ^ ICt?: Henley; SECOND: Aiken; VOTE: Passed unanimously <br /> NEW B717 -7/3S: <br /> 1. Spe: i. Limit Study_ - The City Engineer was instructed to make a <br /> �.. o .traffic problems to determine the feasibility of reduc- <br /> ing t:he speed in the Toon to 25 P'LE. . <br /> V•PIkre“; . <br /> 1. lm :enataedtR._ L. g:52-60) - Request for Reduction of Side Yard <br /> Se`b= k 1Requirement. <br /> City Clerk read the Planning Commission' s recommendation for ap- <br /> prerl, dated_ Feb. 1 , 1962. <br /> ""r. Colin Peters , Counsel for Mr. Finkenstaedt, stated that Mr. <br /> FintEnstaedt is satisfied with the condition imposed. <br />