Laserfiche WebLink
i Y .. <br /> -2- <br /> Announcements Cont'd. <br /> 41111 Santa Clara County Inter-City Council - Notice of cancellation of meeting of July 5; <br /> next meeting to be held August 2, 1962 in Campbell. <br /> COMMITTEE REPORTS: <br /> 1. Traffic Problems - Councilman Aiken commented on hazardous traffic conditions in the <br /> Town with regard to speeding sports cars. He suggested that steps be taken to al- <br /> leviate these conditions, perhaps by posting signs at the Town's entrances. <br /> Comments were heard from Mr. Gardner Bullis, relative to requesting the Sheriff's <br /> Dept. to use motorcycles or additional cars. <br /> Mr. ::m. T. Newman commented on the use of patrol cars. <br /> OLD BUSINESS: <br /> 1. Fernhill Assessment District - Continuation of Public Hearing. <br /> Mr. Gardner Bullis, Counsel for hr. R. h. Gieseker, Mr. Eugene Buitrago, and Mr. <br /> Joseph H. Cox, commented on the requirement of the Subdivision Ordinance--that sub- <br /> dividers must improve one-half (M width of the road contiguous to the property. <br /> Mr. Gieseker questioned what improvement is anticipated for Camino Merraoso. lar. <br /> Salfen, City Clerk, answered by announcing that the following subdividers will he <br /> required to make improvements: Mr. R. Deal, Beekhuis-MacDonald, and Mrs. G. MacDonald. <br /> Mr. Gieseker presented a plan showing the assessment of properties which, in his <br /> opinion, was an inequitable distribution of the assessment. Iie made reference to <br /> letter, dated December 15, 1961 and Memo, dated April 17, 1962, both from the Engineer, <br /> hr. .:atson Clifford, to Mr. Paul w. Salfen, City Manger. <br /> Gieseker suggested a respread of the assessment, stati:g that he would be in favor <br /> of having the lower lot, fronting on :ernhill, assessed the full amount, disregarding <br /> the 41200 paid at the time the property was subdivided, and exempting the three lots <br /> fronting on Lomita Linda from the assessment district. <br /> Mr. Buitrago read and submitted a letter, dated July 2, 1962, to the Mayor and Coun- <br /> cilmen. lie requested that the letter be made a part of the Minutes. <br /> Mr. Buitrago's letter is by reference hereby made a part of these minutes and the <br /> same is filed with the Record Copy of the Minutes which are on file in the Office of <br /> the City Clerk. <br /> Following dicussion of Mr. Buitrago's letter and remarks, the public Hearing was <br /> closed (8:56 P. M. ). <br /> The City Attorney commented that problems relative to right-of-way have been resolved; <br /> that the proposed refunding agreement has been prepared; that there has been favorable <br /> response eith regard to bids for sale of bonds. He further stated that he felt the <br /> Contractor for proposed improvements to Fernhill will extend his contract for a few <br /> more days if favorable action taken at this meeting. <br /> 4 Mr. Faisant commented on the alternative action that could be taken in view of the <br /> protests heard. (1) That the Council proceed with the District as presently pro- <br /> posed and overrule the protests. (2) Propose a respreading of the assessment (bo <br /> be done by resolution). - (5) That the entire project be dropped at this time. <br />