Laserfiche WebLink
o J ., <br /> 3_ <br /> Fernhill cont'd. <br /> Following discussion, and at the request of Councilman Aiken, Resolution No. 206, call- <br /> ing for a respread of the assessment for the Fernhill Project 61-1, was read by the <br /> City Attorney in its entirety. <br /> ACTION: <br /> Adopt Resolution No. 206 as read. <br /> MOTION: Aiken; <br /> Councilman Sherlock questioned whether or not the Resolution set forth the proposed <br /> respread. The Attorney answered that it did not. <br /> SECOND: Sherlock; <br /> ROLL CALL: AYES: Aiken, Fowle, Sherlock, Mayor Clayton <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: Henley <br /> 2. Roblede Hills Assessment District. <br /> Mr. Wm. T. Newman, Developer, Mr. Charles Coburn, Engineer, and Miss Peggy L. McElligott, <br /> Attorney for the Robleda Hills Assessment District, were present. <br /> Miss McElligott explained in detail the mechanics of the Assessment District with regard <br /> to the sale of bonds for the proposed road, drainage, and water improvements for the <br /> Robleda Hills Subdivision, and answered questions asked by Councilmen. <br /> Mr. Coburn explained the nature of the improvements proposed, stating that the cost of <br /> bringing water to fifteen of seventeen lots, has been estimated at approximately <br /> 18,000 or about 41787 per lot; the amount estimated for roads (public only) is x44,500 <br /> or about 42615 per lot ; and about 490.00 per lot is estimated for storm drainage. He <br /> explained that only improvements within the subdivision, excluding paths and private <br /> roads, are included in the District. <br /> After discussion, the Mayor suggested that action be postponed until a full Council is <br /> present. <br /> ACTION: <br /> That consideration of the Robleda Hills Assessment District be tabled until the <br /> meeting of July 16, 1962. <br /> NOTION: Aiken; SECOND: Sherlock; VOTE: Passed unanimously <br /> VARIANCES: <br /> 1. Stewart, Ray W. (V-112-62) - Request for Reduction of Setback Requirement. <br /> Planning Commission recommended approval of the request for forty-five ft. (45' ) re- <br /> duction in setback from the centerline of a driveway easement for the construction of a <br /> residence. <br /> ACTION: <br /> That Er, Ray W. Stewart (V-112-61) he :=ranted c_ variance of forty feet (40' ) <br /> from the property line. <br /> MOTION: Sherlock; SECOND: Fowle; VOTE: passed unanimously <br />