Laserfiche WebLink
' I <br /> and mio-ht cause undesirable conditions there,. lr this <br /> were to occu. IL is suggested that the Boards diligently <br /> • :pork towards getting a portion of the river waters d <br /> r;e_tcd.. _ rom the bay, transported to the South Bay and <br /> used to upgrade the duality of the riay water at the <br /> expense of the State. What action will the Boards take <br /> if no dilution water were available at that time? <br /> ? <br /> Experts have stated that the prohibition of. discharge T?lay. <br /> sot be the only acceptable solution to the South Bay problem. <br /> • <br /> From the above; it :is clear that by taking action at this <br /> nee "arab_isningj a prohibition of waste water discharge to the <br /> _...raters of San Francisco Bay south of Dumbarton highway Bridge, such - <br /> dict, would clearly restrict the study of viable r^a ._t_erna.t' ves of <br /> Yi_L3 oseSti1-L.Jl.lu £cora _,L..~scat and <br /> oending important studies by both State and local agencies , We <br /> believe that such unreasonable restrictions would not be in the <br /> best interest of the public and therefore should not be adopted. <br /> In making this Statement, we are cognizant that at the present <br /> time the Sete Water Resources Board is sponsoring two fundamentally <br /> important studies, one on l''Bay Dispersion Capability" and trie <br /> other on "Toxicity and Biostimulation.' Both of these studies will <br /> unquestionably he of significance i <br />