My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/17/1958
LOSALTOSHILLS
>
City Clerk
>
City Council Minutes
>
1958
>
11/17/1958
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2016 4:02:49 PM
Creation date
7/12/2016 10:16:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Minutes
Date
1958-11-17
Description
Regular City Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-2 - <br />Pacific Railroad tracks and southeast of Arastradero Road. Mr. <br />' Fred Wickman, Secretary, pointed out the Commission's objectionstt:o <br />the annexation of this area. <br />Deferred to New Business,. <br />OLD BUSINESS: <br />1. Roscoe, Wendell W. - Consideration of Release of Covenant for Lot <br />Unit -1, Fink Horse Ranch Subdivision. <br />The Mayor requested that the Council consider the Covenant apart <br />from the road improvements. <br />A.CTION : <br />That the Council release the Covenant now existing for Lot #6 <br />Unit1, Pink Horse Ranch. <br />MOTION: Treat; SECOND: Bledsoe; VOTE: Passed unanimously <br />2. Pink Horse Ranch Subdivision - Ofd' -tract Road Improvements. <br />The Mayor commended Commissioner Hart H. Tantau and the Committee <br />for the research made and for the fine report submitted regarding <br />the problem of off -tract road improvements for Fink Horse Ranch <br />Unit #1. He gave a brief review of the report, and asked Mr. Tantau <br />to summarize his conclusions. <br />Commissioner Tantau stated that he had reviewed all the minutes of <br />the Planning Commission and Council relative to Fink horse Ranch, <br />and that he also studied the bond posted for Unit #1. He stated <br />that it was the conclusion of the Committee that there was a verbal <br />understanding that the resubmission of two units and the abandon- <br />ment of the driveway changed the picture, and the road improvements <br />would be required for approval of Unit ##2. When the map was orig- <br />inally submitted to the County in 1955, they required realignment <br />of Moody Road. When it was resubmitted to the Town, realignment <br />was not specifically mentioned. <br />Mr. Roscoe was asked for his comments. The following is a summary <br />of his comments: The original plan was approved by the County, as <br />stated by Mr. Tantau. The Town was formed in January of 1956, and <br />it was not until July of 1956 that any action was taken. (There <br />was a difference of opinion as to when action was first taken. One <br />of the Councilmen stated that the first action was taken in May of <br />1956•) The Map was submitted as one unit, but the Planning Commis- <br />sion felt that it would be better to submit the subdivision in two <br />units There were two (2) conditions listed on the original map <br />of one unit. (1) Abandonment of a section of South E1 Monte. <br />This was originally the main entrance to the property. (2) Re- <br />alignment of Moody Road which the County wanted done on their terms, <br />from Stonebrook to Elizabeth Avenue. On three occasions, members <br />of the Planning Commission met on the site and discussed the realign. <br />ment of Moody Road, but it was the unanimous opinion that they did <br />not want the road re -aligned, due to the traffic problem --speed. <br />They also wanted to keep the Town rural, and also at the time, no <br />funds were available. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.