06/18/1986 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

c= cWWIL. MLNUTSS - June 18, 1986 F. OLD BUSINESS: Item 2 - El Monte Guardrail (continued) : MOTION SECONDED AMID CAR=: Moved by Tryon, seconded by FVhrn and passed unwdi sly to take the bids for the El Monte Guardrail Project under advisement and to direct staff and advisory canmittees (specifically Safety and Environmental Design and Protection Committees) to investigate and propose alternate solutions.. 3. Resolution # amending Resolution #1256 wbich adopted a policy con- cerning landscaping, and setting of bonds thereof The City Manager camiented that the resolution before Council revised the aurount of landscape bond that may be required to guarantee the installation of landscaping. He further noted that the mounts had been recoup idea by the City Engineer with the concurrence of the Planning ConmLssion. MOTION SEED ASID CARRIED: Moved by van Tamelen, seconded by Dronkert and passed unaninously to adopt Resolution #88-86 amending Resolution #1256 which adopted a policy concerning landscaping and setting of bonds thereof. Council also directed that copies of the landscaping policy including staff report would be sent to the Envirormiental Design and Protection Co mittee, Pathway Cmn nittee and Planning Commission. Item Removed frau Consent Calendar: a) Resolution # awarding a contract for the Viscaino Court recon- struction project 4Was City Manager mmiennted that he had removed this item frm the Consent Calendar as the bid exceeded the budgeted estimates ($50,000 appropriated; $61,590 bid plus contingencies and inspection) and it would be necessary to ante d the 1989-85 budget. This anrzKn t was scheduled for Council approval later in the meeting. NATION SECONDED AMID CARRIED: Moved by van Tamelen, seconded by Rydell and passed unanimusly to adopt Resolution #89-86 awarding a contract for the Viscaino Court reconstruction project NEW BUSINESS: 1. Request for removal of stop work notice - Land s of Keenan, 27801 Saddle Court (concerning construction of wall) Council had before then a report frau the Staff Planner and the Assistant City Attorney, Susan St. Clair, concerning the wall on the Lards of Keenan. The report rotes that the wall under construction had a stop work notice placed on it for being constructed in excess of the maximum height allowed per Section 9-5.503(c). The wall had received, however a zoning permit aria a building permit. The report further rotes that the Council may interpret Section 9-5.503(c), fence and wall height regulation; may requre the applicant to apply for a variance to allow the fence or may require the structure be made to conform with the Zoning Ordinance. V