Laserfiche WebLink
CITY NDNCIL MiN[7rFS - July 3, 1985 <br />`, Comnissioner Gottlieb reported that the Planning Commission meeting scheduled <br />for June 26, 1985 had been cancelled due to lack of a quorum. <br />G. SPECIAL ORDERS: <br />Public Hearings: <br />a) LANDS OF NO%kCR, Lot #1, Country Way, request for a special land <br />use pexn it to allow construction of a new residence having a height <br />in excess of fifteen feet <br />Council voted on the following notion which was made at the 6/19/85 meeting: <br />MM'ICN MADE AND SECOMM: Moved by Fuhrman and seconded by Dronkert to reconsider <br />the request by Lands of Nowack for a special land use permit to allow construction <br />of a new residence having a height in excess of fifteen feet. <br />A)M: Mayor Dronkert and CcuncilmwnFwr Rydell <br />NOES: Councilmember Allison <br />ABSENT: Councilmemberss Fuhnman and van Tamelen <br />The City Planner referred to her 6/27/85 staff report which stated that this <br />application was not subject to Guideline 2.B concerning the 'grandfather clause' <br />as it was received on 5/1/85 and the guideline was adopted by the Council at the <br />meeting on 5/1/85. The report further stated that staff reaamiended approval of <br />the special land use permit for the project, based on the project's conformance <br />with all of the guidelines for Ordinance #295. <br />council voted on the following motion from the 6/19/85 Council meeting: <br />MYPION SEWI•IDID ASID FA=: Moved by Fuhnman/seconded by Rydell azxl-fair]atthe <br />fai3-�cei�.;ete to approve a special laird use penmit for lards of Nawack <br />for a new residence having a height in excesses of fifteen rf�eeet based on the project's <br />the <br />conformance with <br />roll ca71 vote �(A[>ETIDID BNY ncCO[7[NC21L •The 7/17 85)idered motion failed by <br />AYES: Councilmmiber Rydell <br />NOES: Mayor Drcnkert and CounncihTember Allison <br />ABSENT: Councihrembers F,hzman and van Tamelen <br />Allison stated the project does not conform to the following Sections of Ordinance <br />#295: Section 5(b)(i) The effect which the proposed use has on the comprehensive <br />coning and land use regulations which the Council currently has under study; (ii) <br />The likelihood that the proposed use will conflict with or be coapatible with the <br />proposed comprehensive regulations; (iii) The effect upon the orderly development of <br />property; (vii) Special conditions or exceptional characteristics of the property <br />and its location or surroundings; Section 5(c)(i) The establishment and maintenance <br />of the use applied for conform with the comprehensive zoning and land use regulations <br />being studied, or which the Council intends to study within a reasonable time; and <br />(iii) The proposed use is not detrimental or injurious to property and imp rcv ants <br />in the neighborhood and is appropriate to the location, the lot and the neighborhood. <br />Mayor Dronkert stated that while it was correct to reconsider this application <br />for clarification of the applicability of the grandfather clause, she concurred with <br />the statement by Councilmenlber Allison regarding the project's nonconformance with <br />sections of Ordinance #295. <br />-3- <br />