Laserfiche WebLink
NEW BUSINESS (Cont 'd. )- Page Mill Estates , Tract No. 3306. <br /> that if a street sign is sufficient for identifying purposes, <br /> ) there is no need for a 5-foot high fence , 72 feet long, with <br /> lettering. <br /> Messrs. Garbett and Jones were present and verbally expressed their <br /> objections. <br /> Councilman Fowle asked the City Manager if the plan submitted for <br /> the Building Permit contained the lettering on it . The City <br /> Manager affirmed it was approved as such. The City Attorney <br /> stated there was no bearing on this whether the Town was liable <br /> for this approval or not. The Ordinance is definite in explain- <br /> ing the use of billboards and that is why the Building Inspector <br /> issued the Building Permit in good faith. Section III , of <br /> Ordinance 42, exempts certain conditions for the placing of signs , <br /> advertising display or identifying the property. <br /> Councilman Henley suggested holding the matter over until the <br /> Council had seen the fence and entry gates in question. <br /> Councilman Fowle stated that in his opinion the sign was definitely <br /> advertising and made the following motion. <br /> ACTION: <br /> That the City Staff be authorized to remove the <br /> letters on the panel of the sign on Arastradero <br /> Road. <br /> MOTION: Fowle ; SECOND : Bowler <br /> Mr. Gamboa stated his case by saying he had conformed to the <br /> Town' s requests as to underground utilities , grading, etc. , had <br /> put in individual sprinkler systems to uphold the status of the <br /> neighborhood , and felt that the redwood fence and entry gates <br /> were as presentable as possible to conform to the countryside. <br /> Also, this sign could not be constructed as advertising, as <br /> eight houses had been sold before the sign was even erected. <br /> As both sides of the question had been heard and in view of the <br /> fact that Mayor Clayton expressed a desire to view the fence and <br /> sign, Councilmen Fowle and Bowler withdrew the foregoing Motion <br /> and Second, and it was requested of the City Clerk to place this <br /> matter on the Agenda for the next Regular Meeting, October 7, <br /> 1963. <br /> 3. Jones-Thenn Associates - Matter of Cochran Map. <br /> Jones-Thenn Associates asked to be withdrawn from the Agenda. <br /> VARIANCES: <br /> (J1 . Michaelian Construction Co. (V-155-63) - Request for Reduction <br /> of Setback Requirement for Garage. <br /> -3- <br />