11/23/1959 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-2- The Committee recermended that the inhabited procedure of annexa- tion be followed. Mr. Robin D. Faisant , City attorney, submitted a report outlining annexation procedures which may be followed in accordance with the Government Code of the State of Californa. He explained that there are sore methods of shortcutting the procedure which would cut down the tine required, but that he would recommend the procedure as he has outlined. Corrissionor Williars reported that Commissioner Mellquist had given the Committee 's report to the Flanning Commission at its meeting on Noverber 21st. At the meeting a resolution was proposed and adopted, urging the Council to proceed with immediate annexa- tion proceedings. Commissioner Williams read Resolution No. 3-59 of the Flanning Co[rlssion. Mayor 'Towle declared the meeting open for questions and comments from the audience. The following persons, presently in the unincorporated area, ex- pressed a desire to be included in the proposed annexation to the Town: Dr. Frank Derry, 23260 Eastbrook Ave , Mr. S. H. Williston, Loyola Dr. , Mr. Joseph R. ',Jolie, 11090 Mora Dr. , Mr. John Hayes, 11750 rlateau ave. , Mrs. Elver Filippini, 23170 Eastbrook Dr. , Mrs. A. Gormely, 23211 Eastbrook Ave. , Mrs. J. E. Sherman, 23170 Eastbrook Ave. , Mr. Greer W. Sugden, 22548 Ravensbury -Ave. , and Mr. Eldon J. Gilbert, 10695 Eloise Circle. It was noted that Mr. John Hays ' propertyis net included in the area proposed for annexation. Mr. 0. E. Huttlinger of Los 'ltos Hills expressed concurrence with with the Committee 's recommendation. Mr. Frank Duveneck explained that he has willed a portion of his a portion of his land to Santa Clara County for a future park. He stated that a ridge divides his lend, and that a portion would be logically in the limits of Los Altos Hills, and that at some future date ; he nay be sympathetic to being a part of the Town. The question was, asked Mr. Faisant relative to what chance Los Altos Hills ' proposed annexation has if the rap submitted by Los Altos is a valid one. Mr. Faisant answered that the Town is act- ing on the aawrption that the nap is invalid, but that if it is found to be valid, the Town is wasting its tine. Mr. Colin Peters, Attorney, stated that there are several interest- ed parties in the proposed Los 1tos annexation who are going to contest the annexation. Councilman Sherlock mentioned that all of the 'conments heard in favor of the annexation were from the Eastbrook area, and question- ed whether or not people in other areas were favorable to the pro- posed annexation. Several of those persons who had spoken in favor of the proposed annexation, stated that neighbors in their areas were also in favor of annextion to Los Altos Hills rather than to Los 11tos.